Performance assessment and strengthening proposal of an existing building

被引:2
|
作者
Erdem, R. Tugrul [1 ]
Karal, Kocali [1 ]
机构
[1] Sveuciliste Manisa Celal Bayar, Odjel Gradevinarstvo, Manisa, Turkey
来源
GRADEVINAR | 2022年 / 74卷 / 01期
关键词
reinforced concrete building; performance analysis; seismic codes; strengthening; REINFORCED-CONCRETE BUILDINGS; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.14256/JCE.3250.2021
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Due to major-scale earthquakes, revisions of earthquake resistant structural design methods have periodically been made in seismic codes. It is known that many existing buildings are located in active seismic zones in all parts of the world. Severe damage to structural members, with partial or total collapse of buildings, has been observed in past earthquakes. Consequently, the evaluation of seismic performance and strengthening techniques of the existing buildings according to various seismic codes has become a global issue in structural engineering. With the development of computer technology, non-linear methods have been offering increasingly reliable evaluation procedures in the performance-based assessment of buildings. In this study, non-linear performance analysis of an existing typical mid-rise reinforced concrete building is first performed according to Turkish Building Earthquake Code-2018 and American Standard, ASCE. After evaluation of damage to structural members, the building is strengthened by steel braces and the analysis is performed once again. The SAP2000 finite elements analysis software is utilized in the solutions. Damage ratios of structural members as well as modal properties and storey drift ratios are determined and compared according to both codes, and it is concluded that the proposed strengthening method could be a significant alternative in such buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 61
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Response assessment of an existing building designed for earthquake loading
    Mosleh, Araliya
    Varum, Humberto
    Rodrigues, Hugo
    Costa, Anibal
    EURODYN 2014: IX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, : 537 - 541
  • [42] Seismic Vulnerability and Damage Assessment of an Existing URM Building
    Mustapha Remki
    Benazouz Chikh
    Abderrahmane Kibboua
    Fouad Kehila
    Youcef Mehani
    Boubakeur Fettar
    Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2019, 43 : 569 - 581
  • [43] Knowledge gap with the existing building energy assessment systems
    Al-Addous, Mohammad
    Albatayneh, Aiman
    ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2020, 38 (03) : 783 - 794
  • [44] Seismic vulnerability assessment using the instrumentation of an existing building
    Duco F.
    Faye J.-P.
    Caperaa S.
    Reubrez E.
    Key Engineering Materials, 2011, 482 : 79 - 87
  • [45] Seismic assessment of a R/C strategic existing building
    Mehani, Youcef
    Kibboua, Abderrahmane
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2007, 26 (06) : 617 - 634
  • [46] Energy performance assessment of existing dwellings
    Poel, Bart
    van Cruchten, Gerelle
    Balaras, Constantinos A.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2007, 39 (04) : 393 - 403
  • [47] STRENGTHENING THE RAFT FOUNDATION OF AN EXISTING RC BUILDING BY APPLICATION OF JET-GROUTING METHOD
    Milev, Nikolay
    Sariev, Anton
    GRADEVNSKI MATERIJIALI I KONSTRUKCIJE-BUILDING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2020, 63 (01): : 9 - 18
  • [48] The experience of strengthening subsidence of the soil under the existing building in the city of Rostov-on-Don
    Prokopov, Albert
    Prokopova, Marina
    Rubtsova, Yana
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE CONFERENCE SPBWOSCE-2016 - SMART CITY, 2017, 106
  • [49] Strengthening of columns in existing one-story industrial building and reanalysis on internal forces
    Xi'an Jianzhu Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, 29 (04): : 447 - 450
  • [50] Seismic vulnerability assessment of a masonry structure and an FRP-strengthening proposal
    Cosgun, Turgay
    Uzdil, Oguz
    Sayin, Baris
    Zengin, Kamil Kerem
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2022, 17