Medication knowledge, certainty, and risk of errors in health care: a cross-sectional study

被引:36
|
作者
Simonsen, Bjoerg O. [1 ,2 ]
Johansson, Inger [3 ,4 ]
Daehlin, Gro K. [3 ]
Osvik, Lene Merete [5 ]
Farup, Per G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Dept Res, Brumunddal, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Unit Appl Clin Res, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Gjoevik Univ Coll, Fac Hlth Care & Nursing, Gjoevik, Norway
[4] Karlstad Univ, Dept Nursing, Karlstad, Sweden
[5] Oestfold Hosp Trust, Dept Surg, Fredrikstad, Norway
来源
关键词
NURSES; SKILLS; PHARMACOLOGY; EDUCATION; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-11-175
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Medication errors are often involved in reported adverse events. Drug therapy, prescribed by physicians, is mostly carried out by nurses, who are expected to master all aspects of medication. Research has revealed the need for improved knowledge in drug dose calculation, and medication knowledge as a whole is poorly investigated. The purpose of this survey was to study registered nurses' medication knowledge, certainty and estimated risk of errors, and to explore factors associated with good results. Methods: Nurses from hospitals and primary health care establishments were invited to carry out a multiple-choice test in pharmacology, drug management and drug dose calculations (score range 0-14). Self-estimated certainty in each answer was recorded, graded from 0 = very uncertain to 3 = very certain. Background characteristics and sense of coping were recorded. Risk of error was estimated by combining knowledge and certainty scores. The results are presented as mean (+/- SD). Results: Two-hundred and three registered nurses participated (including 16 males), aged 42.0 (9.3) years with a working experience of 12.4 (9.2) years. Knowledge scores in pharmacology, drug management and drug dose calculations were 10.3 (1.6), 7.5 (1.6), and 11.2 (2.0), respectively, and certainty scores were 1.8 (0.4), 1.9 (0.5), and 2.0 (0.6), respectively. Fifteen percent of the total answers showed a high risk of error, with 25% in drug management. Independent factors associated with high medication knowledge were working in hospitals (p < 0.001), postgraduate specialization (p = 0.01) and completion of courses in drug management (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Medication knowledge was found to be unsatisfactory among practicing nurses, with a significant risk for medication errors. The study revealed a need to improve the nurses' basic knowledge, especially when referring to drug management.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Primary Care Medication Safety Surveillance with Integrated Primary and Secondary Care Electronic Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Artur Akbarov
    Evangelos Kontopantelis
    Matthew Sperrin
    Susan J. Stocks
    Richard Williams
    Sarah Rodgers
    Anthony Avery
    Iain Buchan
    Darren M. Ashcroft
    Drug Safety, 2015, 38 : 671 - 682
  • [32] Primary Care Medication Safety Surveillance with Integrated Primary and Secondary Care Electronic Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Akbarov, Artur
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Sperrin, Matthew
    Stocks, Susan J.
    Williams, Richard
    Rodgers, Sarah
    Avery, Anthony
    Buchan, Iain
    Ashcroft, Darren M.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 38 (07) : 671 - 682
  • [33] Assessment of the steps taken towards avoidance of medication errors among hypertensive outpatients attending a tertiary health care facility in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
    Amorha, Kosisochi Chinwendu
    James, Glory
    Anosike, Chibueze
    Okonta, Mathew Jegbefume
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 33
  • [34] A Cross-Sectional Study on the Association Between Risk Factors of Toxoplasmosis and One Health Knowledge in Pakistan
    Maqsood, Tooba
    Shahzad, Khuram
    Naz, Shumaila
    Simsek, Sami
    Afzal, Muhammad Sohail
    Ali, Shahzad
    Ahmed, Haroon
    Cao, Jianping
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [35] Home Care Patient's Experiences and Medication Burden Related to High-Risk Medication Use: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Dumitrescu, Irina
    Casteels, Minne
    De Vliegher, Kristel
    Hubens, Charlotte
    Dilles, Tinne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OLDER PEOPLE NURSING, 2025, 20 (01)
  • [36] Knowledge, preventive behaviors and risk perception of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Turkish health care workers
    Arslanca, Tufan
    Fidan, Cihan
    Daggez, Mine
    Dursun, Polat
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [37] Decisional conflict in mental health care: a cross-sectional study
    Margot J. Metz
    Marjolein A. Veerbeek
    Christina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis
    Edwin de Beurs
    Aartjan T. F. Beekman
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2018, 53 : 161 - 169
  • [38] Oral health in cancer palliative care: cross-sectional study
    Kudva, Adarsh
    Ghoshal, Arunangshu
    Mishra, Prachi
    John, Anupama R.
    Saran, Tarangini
    Roy, Sreea
    Salins, Naveen
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024,
  • [39] Decisional conflict in mental health care: a cross-sectional study
    Metz, Margot J.
    Veerbeek, Marjolein A.
    van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M.
    de Beurs, Edwin
    Beekman, Aartjan T. F.
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (02) : 161 - 169
  • [40] Cannabis for medical purposes: A cross-sectional analysis of health care professionals' knowledge
    不详
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2022, 34 (01) : 107 - 108