Methylated Septin 9 as a Promising Biomarker in the Diagnosis and Recurrence Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer

被引:18
|
作者
Lu, Pingxia [1 ]
Zhu, Xianjin [1 ]
Song, Yanfang [2 ]
Luo, Yue [3 ]
Lin, Junsheng [1 ]
Zhang, Junrong [4 ]
Cao, Yingping [1 ]
Huang, Zhengyuan [4 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ Union Hosp, Dept Lab Med, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Clin Lab, 602 Bayiqi Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
[3] Sch Med Technol & Engn, Dept Clin Lab, 88 Jiaotong Rd, Fuzhou 350004, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ Union Hosp, Dept Emergency Surg, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
关键词
STRONG PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; VASCULAR INVASION; BLOOD-TEST; TUMOR; DNA; COLONOSCOPY; CEA;
D O I
10.1155/2022/7087885
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose. The clinical utility of plasma methylated septin 9 (mSEPT9) DNA in screening and recurrence monitoring for colorectal cancer (CRC) is highly promising. The present study was performed to determine the diagnostic value of mSEPT9 in CRC detection and recurrence monitoring in Chinese patients. Methods. Overall, 616 patients newly diagnosed with CRC and 122 individuals with no evidence of disease were recruited from October 1, 2019, to May 31, 2021, at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. Plasma and serum samples were collected for analyzing mSEPT9, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen-19-9 (CA19-9). Data on clinicopathological characteristics were collected and analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic potential of each marker; the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied for the assessment of diagnostic value, and comparisons among mSEPT9, CEA, CA19-9, and their combination were assessed via ROC curves. Results. mSEPT9 achieved an overall sensitivity and specificity of 72.94% and 81.97%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.826, which were higher than those of CEA (sensitivity: 43.96%; specificity: 96.72%; AUC: 0.789) and CA19-9 (sensitivity: 14.99%; specificity: 96.61%; AUC: 0.590). The combination of mSEPT9, CEA, and CA19-9 further improved sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value (sensitivity: 78.43%; specificity: 86.07%; AUC: 0.878), respectively. Notably, the mSEPT9 positivity rate was significantly associated with TNM stage, T stage, N stage, tumor size, vascular invasion, and nerve invasion among patients with CRC. A 100% correlation was observed between the positive results of the mSEPT9 test and recurrence or metastasis in patients after therapeutic intervention. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that mSEPT9 may represent a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of CRC compared with CEA and CA19-9. Postoperative mSEPT9 status may represent the first noninvasive marker of CRC recurrence or metastasis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Methylated septin 9 gene is an important prognostic marker in stage II and stage III colorectal cancer for evaluating local recurrence or distant metastasis after surgery
    Mingliang Huang
    Jiehua He
    Wei Lai
    Lu Liu
    Heyang Xu
    Yujie Zeng
    Qiusheng Lan
    Xiangan Lin
    Zhonghua Chu
    BMC Gastroenterology, 22
  • [42] Methylated septin 9 gene is an important prognostic marker in stage II and stage III colorectal cancer for evaluating local recurrence or distant metastasis after surgery
    Huang, Mingliang
    He, Jiehua
    Lai, Wei
    Liu, Lu
    Xu, Heyang
    Zeng, Yujie
    Lan, Qiusheng
    Lin, Xiangan
    Chu, Zhonghua
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [43] METYLATED SEPTIN9 IS A SENSITIVE AND SPECIFIC BIOMARKER FOR THE DETECTION OF EARLY-ONSET COLORECTAL CANCER
    Loomans-Kropp, Holli A.
    Song, Yurong
    Gala, Manish
    Parikh, Aparna
    Van Seventer, Emily
    Alvarez, Rocio
    Hitchins, Megan
    Shoemaker, Robert
    Umar, Asad
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (06) : S598 - S599
  • [44] Gut microbiome as a promising biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis and immunotherapy response prediction
    Dai, Die
    Xu, Xiaomin
    Shen, Wei
    Zhu, Zhengnong
    Li, Fang
    Yin, Xiaochen
    Kou, Yan
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (23)
  • [45] Investigating the expression level of 9-methylated septin 9 in different grades of colorectal cancer-a meta-analysis study
    Khosrosroshahi, Elaheh Mohandesi
    Fakhar, Haniyeh Bashi Zadeh
    Akbari, Mohammad-Esmaiel
    Izadi, Neda
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL HUMAN GENETICS, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [46] Circadian Rhythm of Methylated Septin 9, Cell-Free DNA Amount and Tumor Markers in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Toth, Kinga
    Patai, Arpad V.
    Kalmar, Alexandra
    Bartak, Barbara Kinga
    Nagy, Zsofia Brigitta
    Galamb, Orsolya
    Wichmann, Barnabas
    Tulassay, Zsolt
    Molnar, Bela
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (03) : 699 - 706
  • [47] Methylated Septin9 has moderate diagnostic value in colorectal cancer detection in Chinese population: a multicenter study
    Lu, Dong-Cheng
    Zhang, Qi-Fang
    Li, Li
    Luo, Xian-Ke
    Liang, Bin
    Lu, Yi-Han
    Hu, Bang-Li
    Jiang, Hai-Xing
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [48] Detection of Locally Methylated Septin 9 of Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma in Peripheral Blood Is Related to Circulating Free DNA Amount
    Molnar, Bela
    Toth, Kinga
    Sipos, Ferenc
    Leiszter, Katalin
    Kalmar, Alexandra
    Patai, Arpad V.
    Scholler, Andrea
    Valcz, Gabor
    Wichmann, Barnabs
    Tulassay, Zsolt
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 144 (05) : S883 - S883
  • [49] Methylated Septin9 has moderate diagnostic value in colorectal cancer detection in Chinese population: a multicenter study
    Dong-cheng Lu
    Qi-fang Zhang
    Li Li
    Xian-ke Luo
    Bin Liang
    Yi-han Lu
    Bang-li Hu
    Hai-xing Jiang
    BMC Gastroenterology, 22
  • [50] The potential clinical and fiscal impacts of blood-based methylated Septin9 testing for colorectal cancer screening
    Roth, Joshua A.
    DeVos, Theo
    Ramsey, Scott David
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)