Coronal Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Kidney: Agreement with Axial Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Imaging in Terms of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Hai-Yi [1 ]
Wang, Jia [2 ]
Tang, Ye-Huan [1 ]
Ye, Hui-Yi [1 ]
Ma, Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] Handan Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Handan 056001, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient; Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Humans; Kidney; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; RENAL LESIONS; PRELIMINARY-EXPERIENCE; MONOEXPONENTIAL MODEL; ADC VALUE; MRI; CARCINOMA; TUMORS; LIVER;
D O I
10.4103/0366-6999.151103
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Coronal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values have gradually become applied (following conventional axial DW-MRI) in the renal analysis. To explore whether data obtained using coronal DW-MRI are comparable with those derived using axial DW-MRI, this preliminary study sought to assess the agreement in renal ADC values between coronal DW-MRI and axial DW-MRI. Methods: Thirty-four healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study; written consents were obtained. All subjects underwent respiratory-triggered axial and coronal DW-MRI using a 1.5-MR system with b values of 0 and 800 s/mm(2). The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the two DW-MRI sequences were measured and statistically compared using the paired t-test. The extent of agreement of ADC values of the upper pole, mid-pole, and lower pole of the kidney; the mean ADC values of the left kidney and right kidney; and the mean ADC values of the bilateral kidneys were evaluated via calculation of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) or Bland-Altman method between the two DW-MRI sequences. Results: The SNR of coronal DW-MR images was statistically inferior to that of axial DW-MR images (P < 0.001). The ICCs of the ADC values of each region of interest, and the mean ADC values of bilateral kidneys, between the two sequences, were greater than 0.5, and the mean ADCs of the bilateral kidneys demonstrated the highest ICC (0.869; 95% confidence interval: 0.739-0.935). In addition, 94.1% (32/34), 94.1% (32/34), and 97.1% (31/34) of the ADC bias was inside the limits of agreement in terms of the mean ADC values of the left kidneys, right kidneys, and bilateral kidneys when coronal and axial DWI-MRI were compared. Conclusions: ADC values derived using coronal DW-MRI exhibited moderate-to-good agreement to those of axial DW-MRI, rendering the former an additional useful DW-MRI method, and causing the ADC values derived using the two types of DW-MRI to be comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 503
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coronal Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Kidney: Agreement with Axial Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Imaging in Terms of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values
    Wang Hai-Yi
    Wang Jia
    Tang Ye-Huan
    Ye Hui-Yi
    Ma Lin
    [J]. 中华医学杂志(英文版), 2015, (04) : 499 - 503
  • [2] Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values in the detection of gastric carcinoma
    Liang, Jianxiao
    Lv, Hailian
    Liu, Qingwei
    Li, Hongfu
    Wang, Jiangquan
    Cui, Engang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (09): : 15639 - 15647
  • [3] Perfusion bias in the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Priola, Adriano M.
    Veltri, Andrea
    Priola, Sandro M.
    [J]. TUMORI JOURNAL, 2018, 104 (04): : 315 - 315
  • [4] Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in prostate diseases characterization on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Salvaggio, Giuseppe
    Calamia, Mauro
    Purpura, Pierpaolo
    Bartolotta, Tommaso V.
    Picone, Dario
    Dispensa, Nino
    Lunetta, Claudio
    Bruno, Alberto
    Raso, Ludovica
    Salvaggio, Leonardo
    Lo Re, Giuseppe
    Galia, Massimo
    Simonato, Alchiede
    Midiri, Massimo
    Lagalla, Roberto
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [5] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Mukherji, SK
    Chenevert, TL
    Castillo, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 22 (02) : 118 - 122
  • [6] Usefulness of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Diagnosis of Infantile Hemangioma
    Saito, Mioko
    Kitami, Masahiro
    Takase, Kei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (04) : 563 - 567
  • [7] Use of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Gastric Cancer Staging
    Soydan, Levent
    Demir, Ali Aslan
    Torun, Mehmet
    Cikrikcioglu, Makbule Arar
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 16 (10) : 1278 - 1289
  • [8] Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis
    Koinuma, M
    Ohashi, I
    Hanafusa, K
    Shibuya, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2005, 22 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [9] Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Brandao, Alice C.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (02) : 321 - +
  • [10] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen
    Schmid-Tannwald, C.
    Reiser, M. F.
    Zech, C. J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGE, 2011, 51 (03): : 195 - 204