Fairea: A Model Behaviour Mutation Approach to Benchmarking Bias Mitigation Methods

被引:41
|
作者
Hort, Max [1 ]
Zhang, Jie M. [1 ]
Sarro, Federica [1 ]
Harman, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London, England
关键词
Software fairness; bias mitigation; model mutation;
D O I
10.1145/3468264.3468565
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The increasingly wide uptake of Machine Learning (ML) has raised the significance of the problem of tackling bias (i.e., unfairness), making it a primary software engineering concern. In this paper, we introduce Fairea, a model behaviour mutation approach to benchmarking ML bias mitigation methods. We also report on a large-scale empirical study to test the effectiveness of 12 widely-studied bias mitigation methods. Our results reveal that, surprisingly, bias mitigation methods have a poor effectiveness in 49% of the cases. In particular, 15% of the mitigation cases have worse fairness-accuracy trade-offs than the baseline established by Fairea; 34% of the cases have a decrease in accuracy and an increase in bias. Fairea has been made publicly available for software engineers and researchers to evaluate their bias mitigation methods.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1006
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A mechanistic model of GPS collar location data: Implications for analysis and bias mitigation
    Augustine, Ben C.
    Crowley, Philip H.
    Cox, John J.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (19) : 3616 - 3625
  • [42] The Threshold Bias Model: A Mathematical Model for the Nomothetic Approach of Suicide
    Dutra Folly, Walter Sydney
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (09):
  • [43] CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL APPROACH FOR EVALUATING BIAS IN LABORATORY METHODS
    YEE, KF
    JOURNAL OF AUTOMATIC CHEMISTRY, 1988, 10 (03): : 144 - 146
  • [44] Homeowner mitigation decision-making: Exploring the theory of planned behaviour approach
    Slotter, Rachel
    Trainor, Joseph
    Davidson, Rachel
    Kruse, Jamie
    Nozick, Linda
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (04):
  • [45] A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach
    Kok, Gerjo
    Gottlieb, Nell H.
    Peters, Gjalt-Jorn Y.
    Mullen, Patricia Dolan
    Parcel, Guy S.
    Ruiter, Robert A. C.
    Fernandez, Maria E.
    Markham, Christine
    Bartholomew, L. Kay
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 10 (03) : 297 - 312
  • [46] Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods
    Haghani, Milad
    Bliemer, Michiel C. J.
    Rose, John M.
    Oppewal, Harmen
    Lancsar, Emily
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2021, 41
  • [47] Actor-Based Methods, Concepts and Tools for Analysing Emergent Behaviour - An Introduction to a Model Based Approach
    Clark, Tony
    Kulkarni, Vinay
    Barat, Souvik
    Barn, Balbir
    ISEC'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INNOVATIONS IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018,
  • [48] A benchmarking model for Indian service industries using MICMAC and WISM approach
    Singh B.
    Grover S.
    Singh V.
    International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2017, 8 (Suppl 2) : 1266 - 1281
  • [49] Hate speech detection and racial bias mitigation in social media based on BERT model
    Mozafari, Marzieh
    Farahbakhsh, Reza
    Crespi, Noel
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [50] Position Bias Mitigation: A Knowledge-Aware Graph Model for Emotion Cause Extraction
    Yan, Hanqi
    Gui, Lin
    Pergola, Gabriele
    He, Yulan
    59TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS AND THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (ACL-IJCNLP 2021), VOL 1, 2021, : 3364 - 3375