Fairea: A Model Behaviour Mutation Approach to Benchmarking Bias Mitigation Methods

被引:41
|
作者
Hort, Max [1 ]
Zhang, Jie M. [1 ]
Sarro, Federica [1 ]
Harman, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London, England
关键词
Software fairness; bias mitigation; model mutation;
D O I
10.1145/3468264.3468565
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The increasingly wide uptake of Machine Learning (ML) has raised the significance of the problem of tackling bias (i.e., unfairness), making it a primary software engineering concern. In this paper, we introduce Fairea, a model behaviour mutation approach to benchmarking ML bias mitigation methods. We also report on a large-scale empirical study to test the effectiveness of 12 widely-studied bias mitigation methods. Our results reveal that, surprisingly, bias mitigation methods have a poor effectiveness in 49% of the cases. In particular, 15% of the mitigation cases have worse fairness-accuracy trade-offs than the baseline established by Fairea; 34% of the cases have a decrease in accuracy and an increase in bias. Fairea has been made publicly available for software engineers and researchers to evaluate their bias mitigation methods.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1006
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bias Mimicking: A Simple Sampling Approach for Bias Mitigation
    Qraitem, Maan
    Saenko, Kate
    Plummer, Bryan A.
    2023 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2023, : 20311 - 20320
  • [2] Bias Amplification to Facilitate the Systematic Evaluation of Bias Mitigation Methods
    Burgon, Alexis
    Zhang, Yuhang
    Petrick, Nicholas
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Cha, Kenny H.
    Samala, Ravi K.
    IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2025, 29 (02) : 1444 - 1454
  • [3] A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias
    Maime Guan
    Joachim Vandekerckhove
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2016, 23 : 74 - 86
  • [4] A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias
    Guan, Maime
    Vandekerckhove, Joachim
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2016, 23 (01) : 74 - 86
  • [5] Bias Mitigation Methods: Applicability, Legality, and Recommendations for Development
    Waller, Madeleine
    Rodrigues, Odinaldo
    Lee, Michelle Seng Ah
    Cocarascu, Oana
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2024, 81 : 1043 - 1078
  • [6] Investigating the Legality of Bias Mitigation Methods in the United Kingdom
    Jorgensen, Mackenzie
    Waller, Madeleine
    Cocarascu, Oana
    Criado, Natalia
    Rodrigues, Odinaldo
    Such, Jose
    Black, Elizabeth
    IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY MAGAZINE, 2023, 42 (04) : 87 - 94
  • [7] Bias Mitigation Methods: Applicability, Legality, and Recommendations for Development
    Waller, Madeleine
    Rodrigues, Odinaldo
    Ah Lee, Michelle Seng
    Cocarascu, Oana
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2024, 81 : 1043 - 1078
  • [8] Quantifying Bias in Agentic Large Language Models: A Benchmarking Approach
    Fernando, Riya
    Norton, Isabel
    Dogra, Pranay
    Sarnaik, Rohit
    Wazir, Hasan
    Ren, Zitang
    Gunda, Niveta Sree
    Mukhopadhyay, Anushka
    Lutz, Michael
    2024 5TH INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE, ICTC 2024, 2024, : 349 - 353
  • [9] The model of evidence-based benchmarking: a more robust approach to benchmarking
    Kulikowski, Konrad
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 28 (02) : 721 - 736
  • [10] BENCHMARKING GAS PATH DIAGNOSTIC METHODS: A PUBLIC APPROACH
    Simon, Donald L.
    Bird, Jeff
    Davison, Craig
    Volponi, Al
    Iverson, R. Eugene
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2008, VOL 2, 2008, : 325 - 336