An optimized BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing for different clinical sample types

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Yoonjung [1 ]
Cho, Chi-Heum [2 ]
Ha, Jung-Sook [3 ]
Kim, Do-Hoon [3 ]
Kwon, Sun Young [4 ]
Oh, Seoung Chul [5 ]
Lee, Kyung-A [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Lab Med, Coll Med, 211 Eonju Ro, Seoul 06273, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
[3] Keimyung Univ, Dept Lab Med, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
[4] Keimyung Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
[5] Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
BRCA1; BRCA2; Blood Buffy Coat; Tissue Preservation; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; SEROUS OVARIAN-CANCER; SOMATIC MUTATIONS; VALIDATION; WORKFLOW; IDENTIFICATION; GUIDELINES; GERMLINE; RECOMMENDATIONS; HETEROZYGOSITY; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: A simultaneous detection of germline and somatic mutations in ovarian cancer (OC) using tumor materials is considered to be cost-effective for BRCA1/2 testing. However, there are limited studies of the analytical performances according to various sample types. The aim of this study is to propose a strategy for routine BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing (NGS) screening based on analytical performance according to different sample types. Methods: We compared BRCA1/2 NGS screening assay using buffy coat, fresh-frozen (FF) and fonnalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) from 130 samples. Results: The rate of repeated tests in a total of buffy coat, FF and FFPE was 0%, 8%, and 34%, respectively. The accuracy of BRCA1/2 NGS testing was 100.0%, 99.9% and 99.9% in buffy coat, FFPE and FF, respectively. However, due to the presence of variant allele frequency (VAF) shifted heterozygous variants, tumor materials (FFPE and FF) showed lower sensitivity (95.5%-99.0%) than buffy coat (100%). Furthermore, FFPE showed 51.4% of the positive predictive value (PPV) on account of sequence artifacts. When performed in the post-filtration process, PPV was increased by approximately 20% in FFPE. Buffy coat showed 100% of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in BRCA1/2NGS test. Conclusions: On the comparison of the analytical performance according to different sample types, the buffy coat was not affected by sequencing artifacts and VAF shifted variants. Therefore, the blood test should be given priority in detecting germline BRCA1/2 mutation, and tumor materials could be suitable to detect somatic mutations in OC patients without identifying germline BRCA1/2 mutation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Next generation sequencing analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 identifies novel variations in breast cancer
    Tacar, Seher Yildiz
    Bozgeyik, Esra
    Seber, Erdogan Selcuk
    Yetisyigit, Tarkan
    Tozkir, Hilmi
    Avci, Okan
    Arslan, Ahmet
    [J]. LIFE SCIENCES, 2020, 261
  • [42] Design and validation of a next generation sequencing assay for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing
    Kang, Hyunseok P.
    Maguire, Jared R.
    Chu, Clement S.
    Hague, Imran S.
    Lai, Henry
    Mar-Heyming, Rebecca
    Ready, Kaylene
    Vysotskaia, Valentina S.
    Evans, Eric A.
    [J]. PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [43] Homologous Recombination Abnormalities Associated With BRCA1/2 Mutations as Predicted by Machine Learning of Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Data
    Albitar, Maher
    Zhang, Hong
    Pecora, Andrew
    Waintraub, Stanley
    Graham, Deena
    Hellmann, Mira
    Mcnamara, Donna
    Charifa, Ahmad
    De Dios, Ivan
    Ma, Wanlong
    Goy, Andre
    [J]. BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 17
  • [44] Next-Generation Sequencing Identifies BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 Mutations in Women at High Hereditary Risk for Breast Cancer with Shorter Telomere Length
    Eyuboglu, Irem Peker
    Yenmis, Guven
    Bingol, Elif Naz
    Yuksel, Sirin
    Tokat, Fatma
    Ozbek, Pemra
    Amuran, Gokce Gullu
    Yakicier, Cengiz
    Akkiprik, Mustafa
    [J]. OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 24 (01) : 5 - 15
  • [45] Analysis of the pathogenic variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 using next-generation sequencing in women with familial breast cancer: a case–control study
    Omar Alejandro Zayas-Villanueva
    Luis Daniel Campos-Acevedo
    José de Jesús Lugo-Trampe
    David Hernández-Barajas
    Juan Francisco González-Guerrero
    María Fernanda Noriega-Iriondo
    Ilse Alejandra Ramírez-Sánchez
    Laura Elia Martínez-de-Villarreal
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 19
  • [46] Benchmarking of Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Panels Combined with Bioinformatics Solutions for Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Alteration Detection
    Vendrell, Julie A.
    Vilquin, Paul
    Larrieux, Marion
    Van Goethem, Charles
    Solassol, Jerome
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 20 (06): : 754 - 764
  • [47] ISO Certification of a Complete Next Generation (NGS) Sequencing Workflow for BRCA1/2 Analysis
    Marchini, S.
    Pileggi, S.
    Mannarino, L.
    Craparotta, I.
    Paracchini, L.
    Beltrame, L.
    Ballabio, S.
    Donati, F.
    D'Incalci, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 20 (06): : 977 - 977
  • [48] A Sample Selection Strategy for Next-Generation Sequencing
    Kang, Chul Joo
    Marjoram, Paul
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 36 (07) : 696 - 709
  • [49] Next Generation Sequencing somatic BRCA1/2 mutation in 64 endometrial serous carcinoma
    Pesci, A.
    Zampieri, F.
    Settanni, G.
    Bortesi, L.
    Ceccaroni, M.
    Bruni, F.
    Gori, S.
    Cassandrini, P.
    Gianfranco, Z.
    Zamboni, G.
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2021, 479 (SUPPL 1) : S27 - S28
  • [50] ISO Accreditation of a Complete Next Generation (NGS) Sequencing Workflow for BRCA1/2 Analysis
    Marchini, S.
    Pileggi, S.
    Mannarino, L.
    Craparotta, I.
    Paracchini, L.
    Beltrame, L.
    Ballabio, S.
    Donati, F.
    D'Incalci, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 20 (03): : S28 - S28