How to interpret ASTM index tests and performance parameters for rolled erosion control products

被引:0
|
作者
Driver, T [1 ]
Kostielney, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] BonTerra Amer, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While engineers, hydrologists, and other similarly trained technical people have an understanding of ASTM procedures and utilization of various test values, many managers and project owners do not understand the relevance of test values to anticipated performance of erosion control products. This paper is an effort to assist people in understanding how some Index and Performance parameters can be used in selecting an appropriate erosion control product. Some manufacturers include in their literature detailed information about the result of ASTM tests performed on their products. References to "performance standards" and "performance capabilities" are found in many brochures, mass mail documents, and in discussions with sales representatives. Values for tensile strength, elongation, flexibility, flow velocity, permissible shear stress, absorptive capacity, resiliency, tear resistance, Manning's "N", and the "C" Factor are commonly found in product promotional literature. What do these values mean to someone who is trying to pick an appropriate material for their project? What is the difference between index parameters and performance parameters? How do the numeric values of the "parameters" translate into real-world results? RECP (rolled erosion control product) manufacturers encourage specifiers and designers to use the test data currently available to assist in selecting the Best Management Practice for their individual projects. The product specified should be able to withstand the stress of installation, provide adequate time for vegetation to become established, control soil loss, and promote the establishment of vegetation. Permanent erosion control is best achieved through permanent vegetation.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 151
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Design considerations related to the performance of erosion control products combined with soil bioengineering techniques
    Di Pietro, P
    Brunet, G
    GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2002, 25 (02): : 142 - 147
  • [22] PERFORMANCE INDEX SENSITIVITY OF OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS WITH UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS.
    Ronge, Peter
    Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 1985, 6 (04) : 359 - 384
  • [23] PERFORMANCE INDEX SENSITIVITY OF OPTIMAL-CONTROL SYSTEMS WITH UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS
    RONGE, P
    OPTIMAL CONTROL APPLICATIONS & METHODS, 1985, 6 (04): : 359 - 384
  • [24] You can’t know what you don’t measure! A road map for manufacturing quality control and certification of rolled erosion control products!
    Sprague, James E.
    Sprague, C. Joel
    IECA Annual Conference and Expo 2019, 2019,
  • [25] Optimal choice of performance index parameters for control design of seismically excited structures
    Ribakov, Y.
    Agranovich, G.
    PROGRESS IN CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING COMPUTING, 2003, : 191 - 208
  • [26] Comparing Erosion Control Products' Performance Results from Field and Large-Scale Laboratory Testing
    Li, Ming-Han
    McFalls, Jett
    Yi, Young-jae
    INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 43 (04) : 382 - 387
  • [27] Performance testing of erosion control products - What have we learned after five complete evaluation cycles?
    Northcutt, P
    McFalls, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF CONFERENCE 29 - INTERNATIONAL EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 29 : 199 - 218
  • [28] Effect of Parameters on the Runoff Erosion Control Performance of Structurally Modified Jute and Coir Geomeshes over Loamy Sand
    Verma, Sushma
    Midha, Vinay Kumar
    Choudhary, Awadesh Kumar
    TEKSTILEC, 2021, 64 (02) : 149 - 158
  • [29] Performance tests of steel spring vibration isolation device and analysis of its structural vibration control parameters
    Fu W.
    Zhao P.
    Han Y.
    Gao Y.
    Wang J.
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40 (17): : 204 - 212and258
  • [30] Control of the quality of polymer products in continuous reactors: Comparison of performance of state estimators with and without updating of parameters
    Scali, C
    Morretta, M
    Semino, D
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 1997, 7 (05) : 357 - 369