Donor-Acceptor Pair Recombination in Size-Purified Silicon Quantum Dots

被引:25
|
作者
Sugimoto, Hiroshi [1 ]
Yamamura, Masataka [1 ]
Fujii, Riku [1 ]
Fujii, Minoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Nada Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
关键词
Silicon quantum dots; nanocrystals; doping; colloid; donor-acceptor pair; OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; N-TYPE; NANOCRYSTALS; PHOSPHORUS; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE; BORON; EFFICIENCY; YIELD;
D O I
10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03489
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Shallow impurity doping is an efficient route to tailor optical and electronic features of semiconductor quantum dots (QDs). However, the effect of doping is often smeared by the size, shape, and composition inhomogeneities. In this paper, we study optical properties of almost monodispersed spherical silicon (Si) QDs that are heavily doped with boron (B) and phosphorus (P). The narrow size distribution achieved by a size-separation process enables us to extract doping-induced phenomena clearly. The degree of doping-induced shrinkage of the optical band gap is obtained in a wide size range. Comparison of the optical band gap with theoretical calculations allow us to estimate the number of active donor-acceptor pairs in a QD. Furthermore, we found that the size and detection energy dependence of the luminescence decay rate is significantly modified below a critical diameter, that is similar to 5.5 nm. In the diameter range above 5.5 nm, the luminescence decay rate is distributed in a wide range depending on the detection energy even in size-purified Si QDs. The distribution may arise from that of donoracceptor distances. On the other hand, in the diameter range below 5.5 nm the detection energy dependence of the decay rate almost disappears. In this size range, which is smaller than twice of the effective Bohr radius of B and P in bulk Si crystal, the donor-acceptor distance is not a crucial factor to determine the recombination rate.
引用
收藏
页码:7282 / 7288
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DONOR-ACCEPTOR RECOMBINATION SPECTRA IN CUCL
    REYNOLDS, DC
    ALMASSY, RJ
    LITTON, CW
    KOOS, GL
    KUNZ, AB
    COLLINS, TC
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1980, 25 (03): : 205 - 205
  • [32] Influence of boron on donor-acceptor pair recombination in type IIa HPHT diamonds
    Scajev, Patrik
    Trinkler, Laima
    Berzina, Baiba
    Ivakin, Eugeny
    Jarasiunas, Kestutis
    DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS, 2013, 36 : 35 - 43
  • [33] Radiative donor-acceptor pair recombination in TlInS2 single crystals
    Aydinli, A
    Gasanly, NM
    Yilmaz, I
    Serpengüzel, A
    SEMICONDUCTOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 14 (07) : 599 - 603
  • [34] Donor-acceptor pair recombination in non-stoichiometric ZnO thin films
    Dietrich, Christof P.
    Lange, Martin
    Benndorf, Gabriele
    von Wenckstern, Holger
    Grundmann, Marius
    SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 150 (7-8) : 379 - 382
  • [35] DONOR-ACCEPTOR PAIR RECOMBINATION IN N-GAAS - ISOLATED-PAIR MODEL REVISITED
    GOLKA, J
    SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS, 1978, 28 (05) : 401 - 403
  • [36] DONOR-ACCEPTOR RECOMBINATION SPECTRA IN CUCL
    REYNOLDS, DC
    ALMASSY, RJ
    LITTON, CW
    KOOS, GL
    KUNZ, AB
    COLLINS, TC
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1980, 44 (03) : 204 - 207
  • [37] ELECTRON-PHONON COUPLING WITH DONOR-ACCEPTOR PAIR RECOMBINATION IN POLAR SEMICONDUCTORS
    ROEPKE, G
    ZEHE, A
    JANNUZZI, N
    JUAREZ, A
    SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS, 1982, 43 (07) : 495 - 498
  • [38] DONOR-ACCEPTOR PAIR BANDS IN ZNSE
    BHARGAVA, RN
    SEYMOUR, RJ
    FITZPATRICK, BJ
    HERKO, SP
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1979, 20 (06): : 2407 - 2419
  • [39] The impact of single donor and donor-acceptor pair on electronic and transport properties of silicon nanostructures
    Anh, L. T.
    Moraru, D.
    Manoharan, M.
    Tabe, M.
    Mizuta, H.
    2015 SILICON NANOELECTRONICS WORKSHOP (SNW), 2015,
  • [40] Donor-acceptor pair transitions in GaN
    Kornitzer, K.
    Mayer, M.
    Mundbrod, M.
    Thonke, K.
    Pelzmann, A.
    Kamp, M.
    Sauer, R.
    Materials Science Forum, 1997, 258-263 (pt 2): : 1113 - 1118