Comparison of different techniques to measure body composition in moderately active adolescents

被引:29
|
作者
De Lorenzo, A
Bertini, I
Candeloro, N
Iacopino, L
Andreoli, A
Van Loan, MD
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Cattedra Fisiol Umana, Dipartimento Med Sperimentale & Sci Biochim, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[2] USDA, Western Human Nutr Res Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94129 USA
关键词
body composition; dual-energy x ray absorptiometry; skinfold equations; impedance equations; adolescents;
D O I
10.1136/bjsm.32.3.215
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Objective-To evaluate the differences in the estimate of body fat percentage (%FM) and the amount (kg) of fat free mass (FFM) by different methods in 26 moderately active adolescents very similar in age, body fatness, and training status. Methods-Mean (SD) age was 16.7 (0.9) years, height was 177.0 (5.1) cm, and weight 68.0 (5.2) kg. %FM was assessed using dual-energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) and two skinfold prediction equations: that of Slaughter et al (%FM Sla) and that of Deurenberg et al (%FM Deu). In the same way, FFM was measured using DXA and different impedance equations: those of Suprasongsin et al (FFM Sup), Schaefer et al (FFM Sch), Houtkooper et al (FFM Hou), and Deurenberg et al (FFM Deu). To determine the interchangeability of the different methods of measuring %FM and FFM, one way analysis of variance, standard error (SE), and coefficient of variation (CV%) ((SD/mean) x 100) were used. Results-On average, no significant statistical differences were observed between the values determined for %FM: DXA value, 11.7 (5.4)%; %FM Sla, 10.9 (4.0)%; %FM Deu, 11.5 (2.3)%. On the other hand, SE and CV% between each pair of the three methods used showed very large variability. With regard to the measurement or prediction of FFM, the mean value measured by DXA was significantly higher than that predicted by the equation of Sch (+7.2 kg, p<0.001), Deu (+3.2 kg, p<0.001), and Hou (+2.6 kg, p<0.001), whereas it was lower than that predicted by the equation of Sup (-1.6 kg, p<0.05). The Hou and Deu values were the only two that, on average, did not differ in a statistically significant way, although they showed the highest CV%. Conclusions-In our sample of moderately active adolescents the estimated values for %FM and FFM appear to be highly dependent on method.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 219
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estimation of body composition in competitive swimmers by means of three different techniques
    Avlonitou, E
    Georgiou, E
    Douskas, G
    Louizi, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1997, 18 (05) : 363 - 368
  • [32] A Comparison of Different Methods to Measure Body Temperature During Exercise in the Heat
    van der Loo, Hanno
    den Hartog, Emiel A.
    Daanen, Hein A. M.
    Heus, Ronald
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S57 - S57
  • [33] How body composition techniques measure up for reliability across the age-span
    Rose, Grace L.
    Farley, Morgan J.
    Slater, Gary J.
    Ward, Leigh C.
    Skinner, Tina L.
    Keating, Shelley E.
    Schaumberg, Mia A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2021, 114 (01): : 281 - 294
  • [34] The role and place of bioimpedance analysis assessment of body composition of children and adolescents with different body mass
    Girsh, Ya., V
    Gerasimchik, O. A.
    BYULLETEN SIBIRSKOY MEDITSINY, 2018, 17 (02): : 121 - 132
  • [35] Body composition of undergraduates - comparison of four different measurement methods
    Brtkova, Mirianna
    Bakalar, Peter
    Matus, Ivan
    Hancova, Martina
    Rimarova, Kvetoslava
    PHYSICAL ACTIVITY REVIEW, 2014, 2 : 38 - 44
  • [36] A comparison of DEXA vs hydrostatic weighing techniques for body composition analysis
    McLaughlin, K
    Russo, A
    Marino, J
    Lamonte, A
    Serrano, R
    Wygand, J
    Otto, R
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2004, 36 (05): : S69 - S69
  • [37] Validation of Near Infrared Reactance and Bioelectrical Impedance Techniques for Body Composition Measurement in Adolescents
    Lambert, Estelle V.
    Will, Michelle
    Micklesfield, Lisa
    Noakes, Timothy D.
    Lambert, Michael I.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S310 - S310
  • [38] Comparison of Body Size Estimation in Adolescents with Different Types of Eating Disorders
    Schneider, Nora
    Frieler, Katja
    Pfeiffer, Ernst
    Lehmkuhl, Ulrike
    Salbach-Andrae, Harriet
    EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW, 2009, 17 (06) : 468 - 475
  • [39] Varying Body Composition and Growth in Indian Adolescents from Different Socioeconomic Strata
    Patel, Prerna P.
    Patel, Pinal A.
    Patel, Ashish D.
    Chiplonkar, Shashi A.
    Khadilkar, Anuradha, V
    CURRENT NUTRITION & FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 16 (04) : 578 - 584
  • [40] Comparison of four body composition techniques to estimate body fat in normal healthy subjects.
    Levenhagen, DK
    Borel, MJ
    Welch, DC
    Piasecki, JH
    Piasecki, DP
    Flakoll, PJ
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1998, 12 (05): : A868 - A868