Evaluation of machine learning techniques with multiple remote sensing datasets in estimating monthly concentrations of ground-level PM2.5

被引:128
|
作者
Xu, Yongming [1 ]
Ho, Hung Chak [2 ]
Wong, Man Sing [2 ,3 ]
Deng, Chengbin [4 ]
Shi, Yuan [5 ]
Chan, Ta-Chien [6 ]
Knudby, Anders [7 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Remote Sensing & Geomat Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Land Surveying & Geo Informat, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Res Inst Sustainable Urban Dev, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Geog, Binghamton, NY USA
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Sch Architecture, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Acad Sinica, Res Ctr Humanities & Social Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Univ Ottawa, Dept Geog Environm & Geomat, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTH; SPATIOTEMPORAL PREDICTION; PARTICULATE MATTER; BRITISH-COLUMBIA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AIR-QUALITY; MODIS; EXPOSURE; AOD; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has been recognized as a key air pollutant that can influence population health risk, especially during extreme cases such as wildfires. Previous studies have applied geospatial techniques such as land use regression to map the ground-level PM2.5, while some recent studies have found that Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) derived from satellite images and machine learning techniques may be two elements that can improve spatiotemporal prediction. However, there has been a lack of studies evaluating use of different machine learning techniques with AOD datasets for mapping PM2.5, especially in areas with high spatiotemporal variability of PM2.5. In this study, we compared the performance of eight predictive algorithms with the use of multiple remote sensing datasets, including satellite-derived AOD data, for the prediction of ground-level PM2.5 concentration. Based on the results, Cubist, random forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting were the algorithms with better performance, while Cubist was the best (CV-RMSE = 2.64 mu g/m(3), CV-R-2 = 0.48). Variable importance analysis indicated that the predictors with the highest contributions in modelling were monthly AOD and elevation. In conclusion, appropriate selection of machine learning algorithms can improve ground-level PM2.5 estimation, especially for areas with nonlinear relationships between PM2.5 and predictors caused by complex terrain. Satellite-derived data such as AOD and land surface temperature (LST) can also be substitutes for traditional datasets retrieved from weather stations, especially for areas with sparse and uneven distribution of stations. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1417 / 1426
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimating Ground-Level PM2.5 in China Using Satellite Remote Sensing
    Ma, Zongwei
    Hu, Xuefei
    Huang, Lei
    Bi, Jun
    Liu, Yang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (13) : 7436 - 7444
  • [2] Deep Learning Architecture for Estimating Hourly Ground-Level PM2.5 Using Satellite Remote Sensing
    Sun, Yibo
    Zeng, Qiaolin
    Geng, Bing
    Lin, Xingwen
    Sude, Bilige
    Chen, Liangfu
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2019, 16 (09) : 1343 - 1347
  • [3] Estimating ground-level PM2.5 in the eastern united states using satellite remote sensing
    Liu, Y
    Sarnat, JA
    Kilaru, A
    Jacob, DJ
    Koutrakis, P
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (09) : 3269 - 3278
  • [4] Predicting ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: A hybrid remote sensing and machine learning approach
    Li, Xintong
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 249 : 735 - 749
  • [5] DEEP LEARNING FOR GROUND-LEVEL PM2.5 PREDICTION FROM SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING DATA
    Li, Tongwen
    Shen, Huanfeng
    Yuan, Qiangqiang
    Zhang, Liangpei
    [J]. IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 7581 - 7584
  • [6] Remote sensing of ground-level PM2.5 combining AOD and backscattering profile
    Li, Siwei
    Joseph, Everette
    Min, Qilong
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 183 : 120 - 128
  • [7] Estimating ground-level PM2.5 using aerosol optical depth determined from satellite remote sensing
    van Donkelaar, Aaron
    Martin, Randall V.
    Park, Rokjin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D21)
  • [8] Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in the southeastern US using geographically weighted regression
    Hu, Xuefei
    Waller, Lance A.
    Al-Hamdan, Mohammad Z.
    Crosson, William L.
    Estes, Maurice G., Jr.
    Estes, Sue M.
    Quattrochi, Dale A.
    Sarnat, Jeremy A.
    Liu, Yang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 121 : 1 - 10
  • [9] Data Integration for ML-CNPM2.5: A Public Sample Dataset Based on Machine Learning Models and Remote Sensing Technology Applied for Estimating Ground-Level PM2.5 in China
    Fan, Yulong
    Sun, Lin
    Liu, Xirong
    [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62
  • [10] Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations across Malaysia
    Zaman, Nurul Amalin Fatihah Kamarul
    Kanniah, Kasturi Devi
    Kaskaoutis, Dimitris G.
    Latif, Mohd Talib
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (16):