Preferences and Insights for Participation in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Prevention Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study

被引:2
|
作者
Fleischer, Chelsie L. [1 ]
Bemis, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Feser, Marie L. [1 ]
Kormendi, Vasilisa A. [1 ]
Zhang, Alvina [1 ]
Ketcham, Katherine [1 ]
White, Sharon D. [1 ]
Striebich, Christopher C. [1 ]
Deane, Kevin D. [1 ]
Harrison, Mark [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, St Pauls Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Arthrit Res Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
ARTHRALGIA;
D O I
10.1002/acr2.11500
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) can be elevated prior to inflammatory arthritis (IA). The potential to intervene in people with ACPA positivity underpins the development of prevention trials in RA. The Research Participation Influences Study examined factors influencing the decisions of individuals who are ACPA(+) to participate in a prevention trial using qualitative and quantitative methods. Methods Individuals with ACPA positivity without IA were provided information regarding their risk for future RA, were provided a description of a clinical prevention trial using hydroxychloroquine, and were asked if they would participate in the trial. After agreeing to or declining participation, they were surveyed on what influenced their decision using Likert scales and open-response questions. Results Thirty-nine individuals who agreed to trial participation (enrollees) and 31 individuals who declined (nonenrollees) completed surveys. Enrollees expressed greater perceived risk for RA and greater perception of benefit to themselves or others than nonenrollees. Nonenrollees expressed greater concern about medication effects and less personal or family experience with RA than enrollees. There was a higher proportion of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with RA in enrollees versus nonenrollees (54% vs. 23%, P = 0.01). Conclusion Enrollees were more likely than nonenrollees to be FDRs, exhibit stronger concern for personal risk for RA, and have less concern about adverse effects. Further exploration is needed to determine why these differences were present, including exploration of symptoms and the role of family history. Understanding these issues will better inform researchers and individuals who are candidates for prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:974 / 982
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preferences and Insights for Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Prevention Trial Participation
    Fleischer, Chelsie
    Feser, Marie
    Bemis, Elizabeth
    Striebich, Christopher
    Moss, LauraKay
    Kormendi, Vasilisa
    White, Sharon
    Holers, V. Michael
    Harrison, Mark
    Deane, Kevin
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 71
  • [2] Perspectives of facilitators and barriers to cancer clinical trial participation: A mixed-methods study
    Williams, Lovoria B.
    Burris, Jessica L.
    Borger, Tia N.
    Acree, Tianna
    Abufarsakh, Bassema M.
    Arnold, Susanne M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [3] Personalised care packages for people with rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed-methods study
    Dey, Mrinalini
    Busby, Amanda
    Isaacs, John D.
    Pratt, Arthur
    Ndosi, Mwidimi
    Young, Adam
    Lempp, Heidi
    Nikiphorou, Elena
    [J]. RMD OPEN, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [4] Belgian rheumatologists’ preferences regarding measures of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a mixed-methods study
    D. De Cock
    E. Buckinx
    S. Pazmino
    D. Bertrand
    V. Stouten
    R. Westhovens
    P. Verschueren
    [J]. Rheumatology International, 2022, 42 : 815 - 823
  • [5] Belgian rheumatologists' preferences regarding measures of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a mixed-methods study
    De Cock, D.
    Buckinx, E.
    Pazmino, S.
    Bertrand, D.
    Stouten, V
    Westhovens, R.
    Verschueren, P.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 42 (05) : 815 - 823
  • [6] WHAT MOTIVATES PARTICIPATION IN ALZHEIMER'S PREVENTION RESEARCH: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Murillo, Lizbeth Vera
    Meulen, Maria Vander
    Villamor, Monique
    Collie, Angel
    Cline, Sarah
    Nicholson, Jody
    Edwards, Jerri
    [J]. INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 767 - 767
  • [7] GP preferences for, access to, and use of evidence in clinical practice: a mixed-methods study
    O'Brien, Emer
    Walsh, Aisling
    Boland, Fiona
    Collins, Claire
    Harkins, Velma
    Smith, Susan M.
    O'Herlihy, Noirin
    Clyne, Barbara
    Wallace, Emma
    [J]. BJGP OPEN, 2023, 7 (04)
  • [8] Factors influencing physical activity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: A mixed-methods study
    Qvarfordt, Maria
    Andersson, Maria L. E.
    Larsson, Ingrid
    [J]. SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [9] A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study of Midwestern Latino Parents Participation and Preferences for Parenting Education Programs
    Ramos, Athena K.
    Su, Dejun
    Correa, Antonia
    Trinidad, Natalia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2023, 32 (02) : 530 - 543
  • [10] DEVELOPMENT OF PERSONALISED CARE PACKAGES FOR PEOPLE WITH EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Dey, M.
    Busby, A.
    Lempp, H.
    Nikiphorou, E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2023, 82 : 1355 - 1356