GP preferences for, access to, and use of evidence in clinical practice: a mixed-methods study

被引:0
|
作者
O'Brien, Emer [1 ]
Walsh, Aisling [2 ]
Boland, Fiona [3 ]
Collins, Claire [4 ]
Harkins, Velma [4 ]
Smith, Susan M. [1 ,5 ]
O'Herlihy, Noirin [4 ]
Clyne, Barbara [2 ]
Wallace, Emma [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Gen Practice, Royal Coll Surg Ireland RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
[2] RCSI Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Epidemiol, Dublin, Ireland
[3] RCSI Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Data Sci Ctr, Sch Populat Hlth Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Irish Coll Gen Practitioners, Dublin, Ireland
[5] Trinity Coll Dublin, Discipline Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Univ Coll Cork, Dept Gen Practice, Cork, Ireland
关键词
clinical practice guidelines; evidence-based practice; mixed methods; patient-centred care; general practice; primary health care; family practice; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; CARE; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0107
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: GPs aim to provide patient-centred care combining clinical evidence, clinical judgement, and patient priorities. Despite a recognition of the need to translate evidence to support patient care, barriers exist to the use of evidence in practice. Aim: To ascertain the needs and preferences of GPs regarding evidence-based guidance to support patient care. The study also aimed to prioritise content and optimise structure and dissemination of future evidence-based guidance. Design & setting: This was a convergent parallel mixed-methods study in collaboration with the national GP professional body in the Republic of Ireland (Irish College of General Practitioners [ICGP]). Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated at the interpretive level. Method: A national GP survey was administered via the ICGP (December 2020) and seven GP focus groups were undertaken (April-May 2021). Results: Of 3496 GPs, a total of 509 responders (14.6%) completed the survey and 40 GP participants took part in focus groups. Prescribing updates, interpretation of test results, chronic disease management, and older person care were the preferred topics for future evidence-based guidance. GPs reported that they required rapid access to up-to-date and relevant evidence summaries online for use in clinical practice. Access to more comprehensive reviews for the purposes of continuing education and teaching was also a priority. Multimodal forms of dissemination were preferred to increase uptake of evidence in practice. Conclusion: GPs indicated that rapid access to up-to-date, summarised evidence-based resources, available from their professional organisation, is preferred. Evidence should reflect the disease burden of the population and involve multifaceted dissemination approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preferences and Challenges in Access to Childcare Programs: A Mixed-Methods Study with Newcomers to Canada
    Massing, Christine
    Gyan, Charles
    Giesbrecht, Crystal J.
    Kikulwe, Daniel
    Ghadi, Needal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD, 2023,
  • [2] Experiences of veterinarians in clinical behavior practice: A mixed-methods study
    Ballantyne, Kelly C.
    Buller, Kristin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY BEHAVIOR-CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10 (05) : 376 - 383
  • [3] Translating Evidence Into Practice via Social Media: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Maloney, Stephen
    Tunnecliff, Jacqueline
    Morgan, Prue
    Gaida, Jamie E.
    Clearihan, Lyn
    Sadasivan, Sivalal
    Davies, David
    Ganesh, Shankar
    Mohanty, Patitapaban
    Weiner, John
    Reynolds, John
    Ilic, Dragan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (10)
  • [4] A Mixed-Methods Study of Factors Influencing Access to and Use of Micronutrient Powders in Rwanda
    Dusingizimana, Theogene
    Weber, Janet L.
    Ramilan, Thiagarajah
    Iversen, Per Ole
    Brough, Louise
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 9 (02): : 274 - 285
  • [5] Preferences and Insights for Participation in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Prevention Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Fleischer, Chelsie L.
    Bemis, Elizabeth A.
    Feser, Marie L.
    Kormendi, Vasilisa A.
    Zhang, Alvina
    Ketcham, Katherine
    White, Sharon D.
    Striebich, Christopher C.
    Deane, Kevin D.
    Harrison, Mark
    [J]. ACR OPEN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 4 (11) : 974 - 982
  • [6] FEASIBILITY OF AUDIT METHODS IN THE STUDY OF DISPARITIES IN SUBSTANCE USE TREATMENT ACCESS: A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH
    Abar, Beau
    Abar, Caitlin C.
    Boudreaux, Edwin D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2012, 43 : S51 - S51
  • [7] Factors influencing the implementation of the CombiConsultation in Dutch clinical practice: a mixed-methods study
    Meijvis, Valerie A. M.
    Heringa, Mette
    Kwint, Henk-Frans
    de Wit, Niek J.
    Bouvy, Marcel L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [8] Improving access to primary care: a mixed-methods approach studying a new review appointment system in a Scottish GP practice
    Slater, Jay
    Malik, Salahuddin
    Davey, Peter
    Grant, Suzanne
    [J]. BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2021, 10 (02)
  • [9] Understanding Preferences of Severe Asthma Patients for Biological Therapy: Evidence from A Mixed-Methods Study
    Richards, A.
    Seo, J.
    Weinhold, R.
    Wagner, L.
    Heidenreich, S.
    Alfonso, R.
    [J]. ALLERGOLOGIE, 2023, 46 (08) : 550 - 550
  • [10] Evidence of gender inequality in energy use from a mixed-methods study in India
    Rosenberg, Meital
    Armanios, Daniel Erian
    Aklin, Michael
    Jaramillo, Paulina
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (02) : 110 - 118