Restriction Spectrum Imaging-Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Improve Prostate Cancer Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance

被引:6
|
作者
Besasie, Benjamin D. [1 ]
Sunnapwar, Abhijit G. [2 ]
Gao, Feng [3 ]
Troyer, Dean [4 ]
Clarke, Geoffrey D. [2 ,3 ]
White, Hugh [5 ]
Fox, Peter T. [2 ,3 ]
Dale, Anders [6 ]
Wheeler, Allison [1 ]
Liss, Michael A. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth San Antonio, Dept Urol, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth San Antonio, Dept Radiol, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth San Antonio, Res Imaging Inst, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Pathol, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] South Texas Vet Healthcare Syst, Dept Radiol, San Antonio, TX USA
[6] Univ Calif San Diego, Multimodal Imaging Lab, San Antonio, TX USA
[7] South Texas Vet Healthcare Syst, Dept Urol, San Antonio, TX USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2021年 / 206卷 / 01期
关键词
watchful waiting; magnetic resonance imaging; prostatic neoplasms; MRI; DIAGNOSIS; VALUES; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000001692
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging is a short duration enhanced diffusion-weighted technique that seeks to standardize sequences and predict upgrading. We test this technology for active surveillance biopsies. Our objective is to investigate the utility of restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging to improve upgrading detection in a prostate cancer active surveillance cohort. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled men on active surveillance undergoing repeat biopsy from January 2016 to June 2019. Subjects underwent prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging reviewed by a urological radiologist for PI-RADS (R) scored lesions, followed by magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy by a urologist. Restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging analysis with proprietary research software (CorTechs Labs, San Diego, California) generated a restricted signal map. We compared the restricted signal map and apparent diffusion coefficient values using T-test, ANOVA, and logistic regression analyses for prediction of upgrading. Results: Of 123 enrolled men we identified 74 restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging regions of interest (targeted lesions) in 110 subjects, with 105 subjects completing biopsy. The restricted signal map was significant per PI-RADS score for true-positive lesion detection (mean difference 28, SD 0.7, p=0.001), and better than apparent diffusion coefficient (mean difference -15, SD 55, p=0.6). Restriction spectrum imaging generated restricted signal map values >50 improved sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (81.0%, 81.8%, 54.2% and 94.2%) over PI-RADS >= 3 (71.4%, 38.9%, 23.7% and 83.7%, respectively) for Gleason upgrading. Overall restriction spectrum imaging is able to improve the AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.49-0.92, p=0.03) to 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.98, p <0.001). Conclusions: Restriction spectrum imaging-magnetic resonance imaging enhances the standard PI-RADS system by providing a noninvasive radiological biomarker to predict upgrading in active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 51
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?
    Osses, Daniel F.
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Luiting, Henk B.
    Van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Krestin, Gabriel P.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (01) : 124 - 132
  • [42] Barriers to obtaining prostate multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in African-American men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Walton, Eric L.
    Deebajah, Mustafa
    Keeley, Jacob
    Fakhouri, Shadi
    Yaguchi, Grace
    Pantelic, Milan
    Rogers, Craig
    Park, Hakmin
    Menon, Mani
    Peabody, James O.
    Dabaja, Ali
    Alanee, Shaheen
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (08): : 3659 - 3665
  • [43] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and active surveillance: How to better select insignificant prostate cancer?
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Cantiello, Francesco
    De Luca, Stefano
    De Pascale, Agostino
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Bollito, Enrico
    Cirillo, Stefano
    Damiano, Rocco
    Russo, Filippo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (09) : 752 - 757
  • [44] Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of High Grade Cancer in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study
    Liss, Michael A.
    Newcomb, Lisa F.
    Zheng, Yingye
    Garcia, Michael P.
    Filson, Christopher P.
    Boyer, Hilary
    Brooks, James D.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Ellis, William J.
    Gleave, Martin E.
    Martin, Frances M.
    Morgan, Todd
    Nelson, Peter S.
    Wagner, Andrew A.
    Thompson, Ian M., Jr.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (04): : 701 - 706
  • [45] SINGLE AND SERIAL MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR MONITORING PATIENTS ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Fujihara, Atsuko
    Iwata, Tsuyoshi
    Shakir, Aliasger
    Tafuri, Alessandro
    Giovanni, Cacciamani
    Gill, Karanvir
    Ashrafi, Akbar
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Desai, Mihir
    Duddalwar, Vinay
    Stern, Mariana
    Aron, Manju
    Palmer, Suzanne
    Gill, Inderbir
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E340 - E340
  • [46] Increasing utilization of multi -parametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance.
    Maganty, Avinash
    Yu, Michelle
    Macleod, Liam C.
    Yabes, Jonathan G.
    Fam, Mina M.
    Bandari, Jathin
    Turner, Robert
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Filson, Christopher Paul
    Davies, Benjamin John
    Jacobs, Bruce Lee
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (07)
  • [47] Outcomes of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients managed with active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Luzzago, S.
    Piccinelli, M. L.
    Fontana, M.
    Botticelli, F. M. G.
    Cozzi, G.
    Mistretta, F. A.
    Catellani, M.
    Bianchi, R.
    Cioffi, A.
    Di Trapani, E.
    Pricolo, P.
    Alessi, S.
    Brescia, A.
    Ferro, M.
    Matei, D. V.
    Petralia, G.
    Musi, G.
    De Cobelli, O.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1472 - S1472
  • [48] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy During Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance
    Tran, Geraldine N.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (02) : 275 - 281
  • [49] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated with Increased Medicare Spending in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance
    Macleod, Liam C.
    Yabes, Jonathan G.
    Fam, Mina M.
    Bandari, Jathin
    Yu, Michelle
    Maganty, Avinash
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Filson, Christopher P.
    Davies, Benjamin J.
    Jacobs, Bruce L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (02): : 242 - 248
  • [50] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    Jayadevan, Rajiv
    Felker, Ely R.
    Kwan, Lorna
    Barsa, Danielle E.
    Zhang, Haoyue
    Sisk, Anthony E.
    Delfin, Merdie
    Marks, Leonard S.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (09)