A multicriteria optimization model for cloud service provider selection in multicloud environments

被引:15
|
作者
Mohamed, Amany M. [1 ]
Abdelsalam, Hisham M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Comp & Informat, Decis Support & Future Studies Ctr, Cairo 12613, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Fac Comp & Informat, Operat Res & Decis Support Dept, Cairo, Egypt
来源
SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE | 2020年 / 50卷 / 06期
关键词
cloud service provider; genetic algorithm; multicloud; particle swarm optimization; simulated annealing; Taguchi method;
D O I
10.1002/spe.2803
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Multicloud computing is a strategy that helps customers to reduce reliance on any single cloud provider (known as the vendor lock-in problem). The value of such strategy increases with proper selection of qualified service providers. In this paper, a constrained multicriteria multicloud provider selection mathematical model is proposed. Three metaheuristics algorithms (simulated annealing [SA], genetic algorithm [GA], and particle swarm optimization algorithm [PSO]) were implemented to solve the model, and their performance was studied and compared using a hypothetical case study. For the sake of comparison, Taguchi's robust design method was used to select the algorithms' parameters values, an initial feasible solution was generated using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-as the most used method to solve the cloud provider selection problem in the literature, all three algorithms used that solution and, in order to avoid AHP limitations, another initial solution was generated randomly and used by the three algorithm in a second set of performance experiments. Results showed that SA, GA, PSO improved the AHP solution by 53.75%, 60.41%, and 60.02%, respectively, SA and PSO are robust because of reaching the same best solution in spite of the initial solution.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 947
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cloud Service Provider Security Readiness Model: The Malaysian Perspective
    Ahmad, Nur Ilyani
    Mohamed, Ibrahim
    Daud, Maslina
    Jarno, Ahmad Dahari
    Hamid, Norlaili Abdul
    PROCEEDING OF 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS (ICEEI), 2019, : 75 - 80
  • [32] Service selection based resource allocation for SBS in cloud environments
    Zhao, Xiu-Tao
    Zhang, Bin
    Zhang, Chang-Sheng
    Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2015, 26 (04): : 867 - 885
  • [33] Development of a Smart Job Allocation Model for a Cloud Service Provider
    Banerjee, Sourav
    Adhikari, Mainak
    Biswas, Utpal
    2014 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (ICBIM), 2014,
  • [34] Integration of analytic network process with service measurement index framework for cloud service provider selection
    Tripathi, Atul
    Pathak, Isha
    Vidyarthi, Deo Prakash
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2017, 29 (12):
  • [35] Secured Cloud Architecture for Cloud Service Provider
    Patil, Nilesh R.
    Dharmik, Rajesh
    2016 WORLD CONFERENCE ON FUTURISTIC TRENDS IN RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (STARTUP CONCLAVE), 2016,
  • [36] Cloud service management decision support: An application of AHP for provider selection of a cloud-based IT service management system
    Repschlaeger, Jonas
    Proehl, Thorsten
    Zarnekow, Ruediger
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2014, 8 (02): : 95 - 110
  • [37] Proportional intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method: Cloud service provider selection application
    Kahraman C.
    Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2024, 46 (04): : 10115 - 10133
  • [38] An Effective Mechanism for Selection of a Cloud Service Provider Using Cosine Maximization Method
    Mohammed Alshehri
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2019, 44 : 9291 - 9300
  • [40] A Multicriteria Framework for Cloud Service Providers Selection Based on the Matter Element Extension Method
    Radulescu, Constanta Zoie
    Radulescu, Marius
    Boncea, Radu
    Petre, Ionut
    Sandu, Ionut-Eugen
    Dumitrache, Mihail
    STUDIES IN INFORMATICS AND CONTROL, 2021, 30 (01): : 77 - 87