Comparative life cycle assessment of various ammonia production methods

被引:232
|
作者
Bicer, Yusuf [1 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [1 ]
Zamfirescu, Calin [1 ]
Vezina, Greg [2 ]
Raso, Frank [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Inst Technol, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[2] Hydrofuel Inc, 1240 Eglinton Ave W, Mississauga, ON L5V 0B6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Ammonia; Hydrogen; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impact; Efficiency; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the present study, four different ammonia production methods are comparatively evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA). The proposed ammonia production systems consist of an electrolyzer for hydrogen production and a Haber-Bosch plant for ammonia synthesis. The required energy for the systems are utilized from various resources namely hydropower, nuclear, biomass and municipal waste. Life cycle assessment methodology is used to identify and quantify environmental impacts in global warming potential, human toxicity and abiotic depletion categories of each method during the life cycle of the systems. The proposed non-conventional ammonia production options are comparatively assessed in terms of environmental impacts and both energy and exergy efficiencies as significant criteria for practical ammonia production applications. The LCA results for the ammonia production processes indicate that municipal waste incineration plant and hydropower based ammonia production methods have lower environmental impacts than other selected methods. The predicted greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) of hydropower, nuclear, biomass and municipal waste based ammonia production methods are calculated as 0.38 kg CO2-eq, 0.84 kg CO2-eq, 0.85 kg CO2-eq and 0.34 kg CO2-eq per kg of ammonia, respectively. The energy and exergy efficiencies of the systems are comparatively evaluated and as an indicator of improvement potential, sustainability index values are calculated accordingly. The energy efficiencies of the proposed ammonia production methods are determined to be 42.7%, 23.8%, 15.4% and 11.7%, respectively for hydropower, nuclear, biomass and municipal waste based options. The corresponding exergy efficiencies are found to be 46.4%, 20.4%, 15.5% and 10.3%, respectively for hydropower, nuclear, biomass and municipal waste based options. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1379 / 1395
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods
    Cetinkaya, E.
    Dincer, I.
    Naterer, G. F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (03) : 2071 - 2080
  • [2] A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment on Nuclear-Based Clean Ammonia Synthesis Methods
    Karaca, Ali Erdogan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Gu, Junjie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2020, 142 (10):
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of nuclear-based hydrogen and ammonia production options: A comparative evaluation
    Bicer, Yusuf
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (33) : 21559 - 21570
  • [4] Comparative analysis of methods for integrating various environmental impacts as a single index in life cycle assessment
    Ji, Changyoon
    Hong, Taehoon
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2016, 57 : 123 - 133
  • [5] Comparative evaluation of calcium feed phosphate production methods using life cycle assessment
    Kowalski, Zygmunt
    Kulczycka, Joanna
    Skowron, Grzegorz
    Sobczak, Agnieszka
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2007, 33 (01): : 83 - 94
  • [6] Comparative life cycle assessment of activated carbon production from various raw materials br
    Vilen, Anna
    Laurell, Panu
    Vahala, Riku
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 324
  • [7] Comparative life cycle assessment of ammonia production by coke oven gas via single and coproduction processes
    Li, Jingying
    Ma, Longfei
    Qu, Peixi
    Tian, Bin
    Nie, Yan
    Liu, Lu
    Xu, Long
    Ma, Xiaoxun
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 882
  • [8] Comparative Assessment of Life Cycle Assessment Methods Used for Personal Computers
    Yao, Marissa A.
    Higgs, Tim G.
    Cullen, Michael J.
    Stewart, Scott
    Brady, Todd A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (19) : 7335 - 7346
  • [9] Comparative life cycle assessment of kerbside collection methods for waste glass cullet for asphalt production
    Zhang, Jingxuan
    Zhang, Guomin
    Bhuiyan, Muhammed A.
    Agostino, Joe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 374
  • [10] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment and Exergy Analysis of Coal- and Natural Gas-Based Ammonia Production
    Cetinkaya, Afsin Yusuf
    Bilgili, Levent
    Kuzu, S. Levent
    Yilmaz, Fatih
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 46 (11) : 2431 - 2441