Comparative life cycle assessment of ammonia production by coke oven gas via single and coproduction processes

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Jingying [1 ]
Ma, Longfei
Qu, Peixi
Tian, Bin
Nie, Yan
Liu, Lu
Xu, Long [1 ]
Ma, Xiaoxun
机构
[1] Northwest Univ, Chem Engn Res Ctr, Shaanxi Res Ctr Engn Technol Clean Coal Convers, Sch Chem Engn,Minist Educ Adv Use Technol Northern, Xian 710069, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coke oven gas (COG); Ammonia production; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Coproduction; Environmental impact; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; GREENHOUSE-GAS; ENERGY; INTEGRATION; HYDROGEN; SCALE; COAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163638
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As an abundant H2-rich byproduct from coking production, coke oven gas (COG) is a favorable feedstock for ammonia production. Recently, three COG-based ammonia processes have been applied, including single process, coproduction of ammonia with methanol, and coproduction of ammonia with liquefied natural gas (LNG). To systematically evalu-ate the environmental impacts of three COG routes, a comparative life cycle assessment was conducted with industrial data. Besides, the effects of ammonia synthesis pressure and electricity sources to the total LCA result were discussed. The results indicate that the environmental impacts of COG-based single ammonia route are mainly generated from ammonia production stage, accounting for 69.63 % of the overall normalized results, in which electricity and COG are the dominated contributors. Therefore, employing electricity from renewables like wind, solar, hydro and nuclear could dramatically mitigate the environmental impacts with a reduction of 36.3 %-70.7 % in most environmental in-dicators. Scenario analysis proves that reducing synthesis pressure from 31.4 MPa to 15 MPa does not show remark-able environmental benefits as expected since higher pressure is more conducive to ammonia synthesis. In comparison with coal based and natural gas-based ammonia routes, COG routes have obvious energy-saving benefit. In three COG-based ammonia routes, the two coproduction routes accounted for 49.1 % and 78.6 % of the energy de-pletion as single production due to highly efficient utilization of resources and energy. Coproduction of ammonia with methanol route exhibits better environmental performance than these in coproduction of ammonia with LNG route. Therefore, coproduction of ammonia with methanol route is more favorable in COG to ammonia processes. This study intends to provide a valuable reference for COG utilization and ammonia production options through the life cycle aspect.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of liquefied natural gas production from coke oven gas in China
    Li, Jingying
    Zhang, Zhuangzhuang
    Zhang, Suisui
    Shi, Fan
    Nie, Yan
    Xu, Long
    Ma, Xiaoxun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 329
  • [2] Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of methanol production from coke oven gas compared with coal and natural gas routes
    Li, Jingying
    Ma, Xiaoxun
    Liu, Heng
    Zhang, Xiyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 185 : 299 - 308
  • [3] Comparative life cycle assessment of various ammonia production methods
    Bicer, Yusuf
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Zamfirescu, Calin
    Vezina, Greg
    Raso, Frank
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 135 : 1379 - 1395
  • [4] Carbon dioxide emission in hydrogen production technology from coke oven gas with life cycle approach
    Burmistrz, Piotr
    Czepirski, Leszek
    Gazda-Grzywacz, Magdalena
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE SUSTAINABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT (SEED 2016), 2016, 10
  • [5] Comparative life cycle energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic costs of hydrogen production from coke oven gas and coal gasification
    Li, Junjie
    Cheng, Wanjing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (51) : 27979 - 27993
  • [6] Hydrogen production via chemical looping reforming of coke oven gas
    Yang, Kun
    Gu, Zhenhua
    Long, Yanhui
    Lin, Shen
    Lu, Chunqiang
    Zhu, Xing
    Wang, Hua
    Li, Kongzhai
    [J]. GREEN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 6 (05) : 678 - 692
  • [7] Hydrogen production via chemical looping reforming of coke oven gas
    Kun Yang
    Zhenhua Gu
    Yanhui Long
    Shen Lin
    Chunqiang Lu
    Xing Zhu
    Hua Wang
    Kongzhai Li
    [J]. Green Energy & Environment, 2021, 6 (05) : 678 - 692
  • [8] Life Cycle of Wash Oil for Benzol Absorption from Coke Oven Gas
    Vecer, Marek
    Koutnik, Ivan
    Wichterle, Kamil
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 42 (04) : 728 - 734
  • [9] GAS TURBINE CO-FIRING OF STEELWORKS AMMONIA WITH COKE OVEN GAS OR METHANE: A FUNDAMENTAL AND CYCLE ANALYSIS
    Hewlett, S. G.
    Valera-Medina, A.
    Pugh, D. G.
    Bowen, P. J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2019, VOL 3, 2019,
  • [10] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment and Exergy Analysis of Coal- and Natural Gas-Based Ammonia Production
    Cetinkaya, Afsin Yusuf
    Bilgili, Levent
    Kuzu, S. Levent
    Yilmaz, Fatih
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 46 (11) : 2431 - 2441