Internal Stress Fields of a Large-Scale Submarine Debris Flow

被引:2
|
作者
Naruse, Hajime [1 ]
Otsubo, Makoto [2 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Fac Sci, Inage Ku, 1-33 Yayoicho, Chiba 2638522, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, Res Ctr Deep Geolog Environm, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305 8567, Japan
关键词
Debris flow; Numerical experiment; Slump; Submarine landslide; Paleostress analysis; MULTIPLE INVERSE METHOD; FAULT-SLIP DATA;
D O I
10.1007/978-94-007-2162-3_54
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Numerical experiments on subaqueous mass transport processes were conducted to understand the internal stress field associate with a natural example of a submarine debris flow, which was revealed by detailed analysis of a deposit exposed as a nearly 1.6 km continuous outcrop. Deposits of gravelly mudstone containing large deformed sedimentary blocks occur in the Upper Cretaceous to Paleogene Akkeshi Formation distributed in the Hokkaido Island, northern Japan. Application of the multiple inverse method to meso-scale faults observed in the blocks reveals possible internal paleostress fields that existed prior to deposition. This analysis suggested two different stress fields: (I) a uni-axial compressional stress field, where the maximum principal compression axis is normal to the bedding surface, and (2) a tri-axial compressional stress field, where the orientation of maximum principal compression axis is parallel to the paleocurrent direction. The results of numerical experiments imply that the first of these stress fields is generated by radial spreading of the flow during its downcurrent movement, while the second stress field results from compression during deposition on the basin plain. A horizontal compression paleo-stress field can be an indicator of the paleocurrent direction of the debris-flow. In addition, it is also suggested that existence of a horizontal compression paleostress field can provide a clue for the initial conditions of the submarine landslide.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endothelial shear stress from large-scale blood flow simulations
    Melchionna, Simone
    Kaxiras, Efthimios
    Bernaschi, Massimo
    Succi, Sauro
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2011, 369 (1944): : 2354 - 2361
  • [22] Outburst debris flow of Yusui Stream caused by a large-scale Silabaku landslide, Southern Taiwan
    Yang, Che-Ming
    Chao, Wei-An
    Weng, Meng-Chia
    Fu, Yu-Yao
    Chang, Jui-Ming
    Huang, Wei-Kai
    [J]. LANDSLIDES, 2022, 19 (07) : 1807 - 1811
  • [23] Extreme climate and tectonic controls on the generation of a large-scale, low-frequency debris flow
    Tian, Shufeng
    Hu, Guisheng
    Chen, Ningsheng
    Rahman, Mahfuzur
    Han, Zheng
    Somos-Valenzuela, Marcelo
    Habumugisha, Jules Maurice
    [J]. CATENA, 2022, 212
  • [24] Outburst debris flow of Yusui Stream caused by a large-scale Silabaku landslide, Southern Taiwan
    Che-Ming Yang
    Wei-An Chao
    Meng-Chia Weng
    Yu-Yao Fu
    Jui-Ming Chang
    Wei-Kai Huang
    [J]. Landslides, 2022, 19 : 1807 - 1811
  • [25] Large-scale Debris Flow Disasters: Hazard-Risk-Vulnerability Analysis Approach in Taiwan
    Wang, Jieh-Jiuh
    [J]. CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES, 2016, 18 (04) : 449 - 463
  • [26] A large-scale teleoperation approach to the exploration of the Hudson submarine canyon
    Konesky, G
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF THE OCEAN AND SEA ICE 2001, 2002, 4544 : 193 - 200
  • [27] Dynamics of submarine debris flow and tsunami
    Pudasaini, Shiva P.
    [J]. ACTA MECHANICA, 2014, 225 (08) : 2423 - 2434
  • [28] Dynamics of submarine debris flow and tsunami
    Shiva P. Pudasaini
    [J]. Acta Mechanica, 2014, 225 : 2423 - 2434
  • [29] Mechanisms of Submarine Debris Flow Growth
    Du, Jianting
    Choi, Clarence Edward
    Yu, Jiantao
    Thakur, Vikas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2022, 127 (03)
  • [30] Laboratory study on submarine debris flow
    Yin, Mei
    Rui, Yi
    [J]. MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 36 (08) : 950 - 958