The minimum speech test battery in profound unilateral hearing loss

被引:39
|
作者
Sargent, EW
Herrmann, B
Kollenbeak, CS
Bankaitis, AE
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Div Otol & Neurotol, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Div Audiol, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[3] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Hershey, PA USA
[4] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Surg, Hershey, PA USA
[5] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Hlth Evaluat Sci, Hershey, PA USA
关键词
minimum speech test battery; unilateral hearing loss; profound hearing loss;
D O I
10.1097/00129492-200107000-00012
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Individuals with monaural hearing experience disadvantages compared with normal hearing counterparts because of the loss of the head shadow effect, the squelch effect, and binaural summation. In this study the Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB), a battery designed to document word recognition in bilaterally hearing impaired cochlear implant candidates, was administered to unilaterally hearing-impaired and normal hearing subjects to study its possible use in measuring hearing difficulty in monaural subjects. Study Design: Repeated measures design with the MSTB administered in sound-field in a sound-isolated booth in I) quiet; 2) speech toward good ear, noise (+10 dB S/N) toward impaired earl 3) speech toward impaired ear, noise toward good ear; and 4) bilateral speech and noise. Setting: Academic otologic practice. Patients: Ten adults with normal hearing and 10 adults with normal or near-normal hearing in one ear and profound hearing loss in the contralateral ear. Main Outcome Measures: The MSTB, composed of the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) test and the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT). Results: As expected, performance differences between the groups were not found in quiet conditions. Analysis of variance and regression analysis confirmed that the impaired group performed significantly worse than control subjects on HINT testing when noise was directed toward the good ear. Analysis of variance and regression analysis confirmed that the impaired group performed significantly worse than control subjects on CNC testing when noise was directed toward the good ear and in bilateral noise. Conclusions: The MSTB may be useful in measuring the hearing difficulty of patients with monaural hearing.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 486
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Aided speech recognition abilities of adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing loss
    Flynn, MC
    Dowell, RC
    Clark, GM
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1998, 41 (02): : 285 - 299
  • [42] The Effect of Frequency Transposition on Speech Perception in Adolescents and Young Adults with Profound Hearing Loss
    Gou, J.
    Smith, J.
    Valero, J.
    Rubio, I.
    DEAFNESS & EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 13 (01) : 17 - 33
  • [43] Trajectory of hearing loss in children with unilateral hearing loss
    Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M. M.
    Nassrallah, Flora
    Gaboury, Isabelle
    Whittingham, JoAnne
    Vos, Benedicte
    Coyle, Doug
    Durieux-Smith, Andree
    Pigeon, Marie
    Olds, Janet
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [44] Hearing Instruments for Unilateral Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kitterick, Padraig Thomas
    Smith, Sandra Nelson
    Lucas, Laura
    EAR AND HEARING, 2016, 37 (05): : 495 - 507
  • [45] Bilaterally preserved otoacoustic emissions in four children with profound idiopathic unilateral sensorineural hearing loss
    Konradsson, KS
    AUDIOLOGY, 1996, 35 (04): : 217 - 227
  • [46] Auditory cortical responses in humans with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss from early childhood
    Vasama, JP
    Makela, JP
    HEARING RESEARCH, 1997, 104 (1-2) : 183 - 190
  • [47] Unilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe, Profound, or Moderate Sloping to Profound Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss A Systematic Review and Consensus Statements
    Buchman, Craig A.
    Gifford, Rene H.
    Haynes, David S.
    Lenarz, Thomas
    O'Donoghue, Gerard
    Adunka, Oliver
    Biever, Allison
    Briggs, Robert J.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Dai, Pu
    Driscoll, Colin L.
    Francis, Howard W.
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Gurgel, Richard K.
    Hansen, Marlan R.
    Holcomb, Meredith
    Karltorp, Eva
    Kirtane, Milind
    Larky, Jannine
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Roland, J. Thomas, Jr.
    Saeed, Shakeel R.
    Skarzynski, Henryk
    Skarzynski, Piotr H.
    Syms, Mark
    Teagle, Holly
    Van de Heyning, Paul H.
    Vincent, Christophe
    Wu, Hao
    Yamasoba, Tatsuya
    Zwolan, Terry
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2020, 146 (10) : 942 - 953
  • [48] Effects of FM system fitted into normal hearing ear on speech-in-noise recognition in Japanese school-aged children with unilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss
    Shimada, Aki
    Udaka, Jiro
    Nagashimab, Hinami
    Chida, Izumi
    Kondo, Eiji
    Nakano, Seiichi
    Okamoto, Hidehiko
    Takeda, Noriaki
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION, 2018, 65 (3-4): : 216 - 220
  • [49] The Finnish speech in noise test for assessing sensorineural hearing loss
    Laitakari, K
    Uimonen, S
    SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 2001, 30 : 165 - 166
  • [50] A Consensus to Revise the Minimum Speech Test Battery-Version 3
    Dunn, Camille C.
    Zwolan, Teresa A.
    Balkany, Thomas J.
    Strader, Heather L.
    Biever, Allison
    Gifford, Rene H.
    Hall, Melissa W.
    Holcomb, Meredith A.
    Hill, Heidi
    King, English R.
    Larky, Jannine
    Presley, Regina
    Reed, Meaghan
    Shapiro, William H.
    Sydlowski, Sarah A.
    Wolfe, Jace
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2024, 33 (03) : 624 - 647