A generalization of using an adjoint model in intermittent data assimilation systems

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, XY [1 ]
机构
[1] Danish Meteorol Inst, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<0766:AGOUAA>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A generalized setup is proposed for the poor man's 4D variational data assimilation system (PMV) of Huang et al. The new scheme is referred to as a generalization of PMV (GPV) and has the same basic idea as that of PMV, that is, to use an adjoint model to improve an optimum interpolation (OI)-based assimilation system. In addition, GPV includes the possibility of using different forecast models in the original OI-based assimilation system and in the variational component of the scheme. This generalization leads to three advantages over the original setup: 1) a wider application of an adjoint model developed for a particular forecast model; 2) an implementation flexibility due to its incremental nature; 3) considerable CPU savings when the variational component is run on low resolutions. A detailed comparison is made between GPV and PMV. The steps of a practical implementation are also given. A 5-day period characterized by intense cyclone development is chosen for testing different data assimilation schemes. Experiments with GPV using a low-resolution variational component based on different model formulations indicate that the proposed scheme GPV, as its predecessor PMV. also leads to better first guess fields, smaller analysis increments, modified baroclinic structures in the final analyses, and improved forecasts. The differences between the GPV analyses and the original OI-based analyses are mainly in the data-sparse area and are related to baroclinic processes.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 787
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assimilation of small scale observations with a nested adjoint model
    Amerault, Clark
    Doyle, James
    ATMOSPHERIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL REMOTE SENSING DATA PROCESSING AND UTILIZATION IV: READINESS FOR GEOSS II, 2008, 7085
  • [42] Estimating model evidence using data assimilation
    Carrassi, A.
    Bocquet, M.
    Hannart, A.
    Ghil, M.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 143 (703) : 866 - 880
  • [43] Adjoint data assimilation into a 3D unstructured mesh coastal finite element model
    Fang, F
    Pain, CC
    Piggott, MD
    Gorman, GJ
    Copeland, GM
    de Oliveira, CRE
    Goddard, AJH
    Gejadze, I
    ESTUARINE AND COASTAL MODELING, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 308 - 324
  • [44] 4D-variational data assimilation with an adjoint air quality model for emission analysis
    Elbern, H
    Schmidt, H
    Talagrand, O
    Ebel, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2000, 15 (6-7) : 539 - 548
  • [45] Flow enhancement from wall pressure observations: A compressible continuous adjoint data assimilation model
    Li, Sen
    He, Chuangxin
    Wang, Weizhe
    Liu, Yingzheng
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2023, 35 (11)
  • [46] MODELING THE INORGANIC PHOSPHORUS CYCLE OF THE NORTH PACIFIC USING AN ADJOINT DATA ASSIMILATION MODEL TO ASSESS THE ROLE OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS
    MATEAR, RJ
    HOLLOWAY, G
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1995, 9 (01) : 101 - 119
  • [47] Adjoint data assimilation in coupled atmosphere-ocean models: Determining model parameters in a simple equatorial model
    Lu, JX
    Hsieh, WW
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1997, 123 (543) : 2115 - 2139
  • [48] Data assimilation method by a variational methodology using the adjoint of a 3-D coastal circulation primitive equation model.
    Devenon, JL
    Dekeyser, I
    Leredde, Y
    Lellouche, JM
    OCEANOLOGICA ACTA, 2001, 24 (05) : 395 - 407
  • [49] DATA ASSIMILATION IN A QUASI-GEOSTROPHIC OPEN-OCEAN MODEL OF THE GULF-STREAM REGION USING THE ADJOINT METHOD
    MOORE, AM
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 1991, 21 (03) : 398 - 427
  • [50] Adjoint to the Hessian derivative and error covariances in variational data assimilation
    Shutyaev, V. P.
    Gejadze, I. Yu.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 26 (02) : 179 - 188