The application of risk models based on machine learning to predict endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer in patients with endometriosis

被引:14
|
作者
Chao, Xiaopei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shu [1 ,2 ]
Lang, Jinghe [1 ,2 ]
Leng, Jinhua [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Qingbo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci CAMS & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp PUMCH, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Obstet & Gynecol Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
endometriosis; machine learning; malignant transformation; ovarian cancer; risk model;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14462
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction There is currently no satisfactory model for predicting malignant transformation of endometriosis. The aim of this study was to construct and evaluate a risk model incorporating noninvasive clinical parameters to predict endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) in patients with endometriosis. Material and Methods We enrolled 6809 patients with endometriosis confirmed by pathology, and randomly allocated them to training (n = 4766) and testing cohorts (n = 2043). The proportion of patients with EAOC in each cohort was similar. We extracted a total of 94 demographic and clinicopathologic features from the medical records using natural language processing. We used a machine learning method - gradient-boosting decision tree - to construct a predictive model for EAOC and to evaluate the accuracy of the model. We also constructed a multivariate logistic regression model inclusive of the EAOC-associated risk factors using a back stepwise procedure. Then we compared the performance of the two risk-predicting models using DeLong's test. Results The occurrence of EAOC was 1.84% in this study. The logistic regression model comprised 10 selected features and demonstrated good discrimination in the testing cohort, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.891 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.821-0.960), sensitivity of 88.9%, and specificity of 76.7%. The risk model based on machine learning had an AUC of 0.942 (95% CI 0.914-0.969), sensitivity of 86.8%, and specificity of 86.7%. The machine learning-based risk model performed better than the logistic regression model in DeLong's test (p = 0.036). Furthermore, in a prospective dataset, the machine learning-based risk model had an AUC of 0.8758, a sensitivity of 94.4%, and a specificity of 73.8%. Conclusions The machine learning-based risk model was constructed to predict EAOC and had high sensitivity and specificity. This model could be of considerable use in helping reduce medical costs and designing follow-up schedules.
引用
收藏
页码:1440 / 1449
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] BAF250a Expression in Atypical Endometriosis and Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer
    Stamp, John P.
    Gilks, C. Blake
    Wesseling, Martine
    Eshragh, Sima
    Ceballos, Kathy
    Anglesio, Michael S.
    Kwon, Janice S.
    Tone, Alicia
    Huntsman, David G.
    Carey, Mark S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 (05) : 825 - 832
  • [22] The Evolution of Estrogen Receptor Signaling in the Progression of Endometriosis to Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer
    Andersen, Courtney L.
    Boisen, Michelle M.
    Sikora, Matthew J.
    Ma, Tianzhou
    Tseng, George
    Suryawanshi, Swati
    Vlad, Anda
    Elishaev, Esther
    Edwards, Robert P.
    Oesterreich, Steffi
    HORMONES & CANCER, 2018, 9 (06): : 399 - 407
  • [23] The Evolution of Estrogen Receptor Signaling in the Progression of Endometriosis to Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer
    Courtney L. Andersen
    Michelle M. Boisen
    Matthew J. Sikora
    Tianzhou Ma
    George Tseng
    Swati Suryawanshi
    Anda Vlad
    Esther Elishaev
    Robert P. Edwards
    Steffi Oesterreich
    Hormones and Cancer, 2018, 9 : 399 - 407
  • [24] How Does Endometriosis Lead to Ovarian Cancer? The Molecular Mechanism of Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer Development
    Yachida, Nozomi
    Yoshihara, Kosuke
    Yamaguchi, Manako
    Suda, Kazuaki
    Tamura, Ryo
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (06) : 1 - 14
  • [25] Factors that Differentiate between Endometriosis-associated Ovarian Cancer and Benign Ovarian Endometriosis with Mural Nodules
    Tanase, Yasuhito
    Kawaguchi, Ryuji
    Takahama, Junko
    Kobayashi, Hiroshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 17 (03) : 231 - 237
  • [26] The role of endometrium in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.
    Wilson, Michael R.
    Holliday, Jeanne
    Su, Ren-Wei
    Fazleabas, Asgi
    Chandler, Ronald L.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (15) : 117 - 117
  • [27] Endometriosis-associated Ovarian Cancer: A Distinct Clinical Entity?
    Bounous, Valentina E.
    Ferrero, Annamaria
    Fuso, Luca
    Ravarino, Nicoletta
    Ceccaroni, Marcello
    Menato, Guido
    Biglia, Nicoletta
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (07) : 3445 - 3449
  • [28] Establishment of the endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer mouse model
    Ono, Motoki
    Miyamoto, Tsutomu
    Asaka, Ryoichi
    Shinagawa, Manaka
    Tanaka, Yasuhiro
    Shiozawa, Tanri
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2022, 113
  • [29] The recent progress and therapy in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer
    Su, Kuo-Min
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    Yu, Mu-Hsien
    Chang, Chia-Ming
    Chang, Cheng-Chang
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 83 (03) : 227 - 232
  • [30] Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer Population Characteristics and Prognosis
    Barreta, Amilcar
    Sarian, Luis
    Ferracini, Amanda Canato
    Eloy, Larissa
    Carvalho Brito, Angelo Borsarelli
    Andrade, Liliana de Angelo
    Derchain, Sophie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 (07) : 1251 - 1257