Energy and environmental profile comparison of TMT production from two different companies - a Spanish/Portuguese case study

被引:9
|
作者
Ferreira, Jose [1 ]
Herrera, Rene [2 ]
Labidi, Jalel [2 ]
Esteves, Bruno [1 ]
Domingos, Idalina [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Study Educ Technol & Hlth, Campus Politecn, P-3504510 Viseu, Portugal
[2] Univ Basque Country, Chem & Environm Engn Dept, San Sebastian 20018, Spain
关键词
Energy; Life Cycle Assessment; Thermally Treated Timber; WOOD;
D O I
10.3832/ifor2339-010
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a technique for assessing the environmental aspects and potential impacts associated with a product and has been increasingly used to identify processes or stages in the wood chain with a high environmental impact or to highlight areas where environmental information is unknown. The main aim of this study was to quantify and compare the environmental impacts and the energy used for the production of one cubic meter of Thermally Modified Timber (TMT) by two different companies, one in Spain and the other in Portugal, using the LCA methodology. The LCA study was developed based on ISO 14040/44 standards. The inventory analysis and, subsequently, the impact analysis were performed using the LCA software SimaPro8.1.0.60. The method chosen for the environmental impact assessment was ReCiPe, and for energy use the Cumulative Energy Demand method was chosen. The results show that to produce 1 m(3) of thermally modified pine timber the Portuguese company used 14.38 GJ of cumulative energy demand, of which 1.92 GJ was nonrenewable and 12.46 GJ renewable, and the Spanish company used a total of 17.55 GJ, of which 2.52 GJ was nonrenewable and 15.03 GJ renewable. The thermally modified pine timber produced by the Spanish company presented the best environmental results for 13 impact categories in comparison to the 5 best environmental results presented by the Portuguese company. From the weighting triangle, we can conclude that the Portuguese pine boards have a lower environmental impact than Spanish pine boards if a high weight (> 40%) is given to resources, while a weight of <80% is given to human health; otherwise the opposite is true. Regardless of the company, the energy used in the thermal treatment process was identified as the main factor responsible for climate change, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant formation, metal depletion and fossil depletion. This has to be expected as the treatment is based on heat production and no chemicals are added during the heat treatment process. The round wood production was identified as the leading process responsible for ozone depletion and also presented remarkable contributions to eutrophication and photochemical oxidant formation.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 161
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comparison Between Spanish and Australian Building Energy Efficiency Codes. A Case Study
    Braulio-Gonzalo, Marta
    Capdevila-Mateu, Aroa
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2014, 2016, : 215 - 228
  • [22] Energy production, consumption, and environmental pollution for sustainable development: A case study in Turkey
    Bilen, K.
    Ozyurt, O.
    Bakirci, K.
    Karsli, S.
    Erdogan, S.
    Yimaz, M.
    Comakli, O.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2008, 12 (06): : 1529 - 1561
  • [23] Energy balance and environmental impacts of rice and wheat production: A case study in Nepal
    Pokhrel, Anil
    Soni, Peeyush
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 12 (01) : 201 - 207
  • [24] Evaluation of an environmental profile comparison for nanocellulose production and supply chain by applying different life cycle assessment methods
    Turk, Janez
    Oven, Primoz
    Poljansek, Ida
    Lesek, Anja
    Knez, Friderik
    Rebec, Katja Malovrh
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 247
  • [25] Study of the phenolic compound profile and antioxidant activity of human milk from Spanish women at different stages of lactation: A comparison with infant formulas
    Sanchez-Hernandez, Silvia
    Esteban-Munoz, Adelaida
    Samaniego-Sanchez, Cristina
    Gimenez-Martinez, Rafael
    Miralles, Beatriz
    Olalla-Herrera, Manuel
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 141
  • [26] "Doing" Sustainability Assessment in Different Consumption and Production Contexts-Lessons from Case Study Comparison
    Engelmann, Tobias
    Fischer, Daniel
    Loerchner, Marianne
    Bowry, Jaya
    Rohn, Holger
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (24)
  • [27] On the comparison of occupancy in relation to energy consumption and indoor environmental quality: a case study
    Assimakopoulos, M. N.
    Barmparesos, N.
    Pantazaras, A.
    Karlessi, T.
    Lee, S. E.
    SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS 2017, 2017, 134 : 875 - 884
  • [28] A social LCA framework to assess the corporate social profile of companies: Insights from a case study
    Tsalis, Thomas
    Avramidou, Alexandra
    Nikolaou, Ioannis E.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 : 1665 - 1676
  • [29] Environmental and Energy Analysis of Two Orchard Systems: A Case Study in Mediterranean Environment
    Pergola, Maria
    Persiani, Alessandro
    D'Ammaro, Daniele
    Pastore, Vittoria
    D'Adamo, Carmine
    Palese, Assunta Maria
    Celano, Giuseppe
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [30] Characterization and quality assessment of granitic building stone deposits: A case study of two different Portuguese granites
    Sousa, Luis
    Barabasch, Jessica
    Stein, Karl-Jochen
    Siegesmund, Siegfried
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2017, 221 : 29 - 40