Determination of Water-holding Capacity of Porcine Musculature Based on Released Water Method Using Optimal Load

被引:31
|
作者
Joo, Seon-Tea [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Inst Agr & Life Sci, Jinju 52828, South Korea
[2] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Div Appl Life Sci BK21, Jinju 52828, South Korea
关键词
released water; filter-paper absorption water; water-holding capacity; drip loss; pork quality; FILTER-PAPER; DRIP LOSS; PORK; MEAT; QUALITY; COLOR; BINDING;
D O I
10.5851/kosfa.2018.e18
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the released water (RW) method for measuring water-holding capacity (WHC) by pressure and filter-paper absorption within two thin plastic films. One hundred fifty pork loins with considerable variations in WHC (three pork qualities: PSE, pale, soft, and exudative; RFN, reddish-pink, firm, and nonexudative; and DFD, dark, firm, and dry; 50 pork loins in each pork quality group) were used to measure drip loss (DL)% and RW % after applying different loads (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 kg). Percentages of DL and RW were significantly (p<0.05) different among pork quality groups. The RW % of 2.5 kg load sample was significantly (p<0.05) higher than that of 2.0 kg or 1.5 kg load sample. However, there were no significant (p>0.05) differences in RW % among 2.5 kg, 3.0 kg, and 3.5 kg load samples for all three pork quality groups. The RW % was highly and positively correlated (r>0.95; p<0.001) with DL %. The highest correlation was observed between DL % and RW % of 2.5 kg load sample (r=0.97; p<0.001). Among all RW loads within each quality groups, the highest correlation between DL % and RW % was observed for 2.5 kg load sample (1=0.43, 0.66, and 0.46 for PSE, RFN and DFD quality groups, respectively, p<0.001). These results imply that applying 2.5 kg load is the best for determination of RW %. It is recommended as a reference method to assess DL % of pork muscles.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 828
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CHANGES IN THE PRESS METHOD USED TO MEASURE THE WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY OF MEAT
    CUZZONI, MT
    GAZZANI, G
    INDUSTRIE ALIMENTARI, 1981, 20 (10): : 708 - 710
  • [22] Protein Oxidation Enhances Hydration but Suppresses Water-Holding Capacity in Porcine Longissimus Muscle
    Liu, Zelong
    Xiong, Youlang L.
    Chen, Jie
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2010, 58 (19) : 10697 - 10704
  • [23] A COMPARISON OF METHODS TO ESTIMATE WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY IN POST-RIGOR PORCINE MUSCLE
    KAUFFMAN, RG
    EIKELENBOOM, G
    VANDERWAL, PG
    ENGEL, B
    ZAAR, M
    MEAT SCIENCE, 1986, 18 (04) : 307 - 322
  • [24] MODIFIED SOYBEAN PROTEIN WITH HIGH WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY
    OCHIAIYANAGI, S
    MIYAUCHI, H
    SAIO, K
    WATANABE, T
    CEREAL CHEMISTRY, 1978, 55 (02) : 157 - 167
  • [25] WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY OF VARIOUS SOURCES OF PLANT FIBER
    HELLER, SN
    HACKLER, LR
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1977, 42 (04) : 1137 - &
  • [26] ADAPTIVE DIFFERENCES IN WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY IN AN INTERTIDAL GASTROPOD
    SEGAL, E
    ECOLOGY, 1956, 37 (01) : 174 - 178
  • [27] Development of a Predictive Water-Holding Capacity Method in Postmortem Longissimus Dorsi Muscle
    Abdullah, Badr M.
    Mason, Alex
    Cullen, Jeff D.
    Al-Shamma'a, Ahmed I.
    2013 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SENSING TECHNOLOGY (ICST), 2013, : 953 - 957
  • [28] IS COLOR BRIGHTNESS (L-VALUE) A RELIABLE INDICATOR OF WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY IN PORCINE MUSCLE
    VANLAACK, RLJM
    KAUFFMAN, RG
    SYBESMA, W
    SMULDERS, FJM
    EIKELENBOOM, G
    PINHEIRO, JC
    MEAT SCIENCE, 1994, 38 (02) : 193 - 201
  • [29] Non-destructive determination of water-holding capacity in fresh beef by using NIR hyperspectral imaging
    ElMasry, Gamal
    Sun, Da-Wen
    Allen, Paul
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 44 (09) : 2624 - 2633
  • [30] COMPOSITION, WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY AND PH OF MUSCLES FROM PIGS SUPPLEMENTED WITH PORCINE SOMATOTROPIN (PST)
    PRUSA, KJ
    LOVE, JA
    MILLER, LF
    JOURNAL OF FOOD QUALITY, 1989, 12 (06) : 467 - 474