Trends in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports to the French pharmacovigilance system (1986-2001)

被引:77
|
作者
Thiessard, F
Roux, E
Miremont-Salamé, G
Fourrier-Réglat, A
Haramburu, F
Tubert-Bitter, P
Bégaud, B
机构
[1] Univ Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, ISPED, EA3676, IFR99, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[2] INSERM, U472, Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00002018-200528080-00007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The French pharmacovigilance system is based on a network of 31 regional centres located in teaching hospitals and coordinated by the French Medicines Agency ('Agence Franqaise de Secuirite Sanitaire des Produits de Sante' [Afssaps]). Since 1984, they have shared a common database of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that are spontaneously reported by healthcare professionals. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics of the reports and the reporting trends in the French pharmacovigilance spontaneous reporting database from 1986 to 2001. Methods: All the reports from January 1986 to December 2001 were included. Drugs and ADRs were translated to anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) codes and MedDRA classifications, respectively. Results: The total number of reports was 197 580 over the 16-year period, with linearly increase over time. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of the patients was 53 (34-70) and the male/female ratio was 0.82. The median (IQR) time between the date of occurrence of the ADR and the date of report was 73 days (34-166). The reporter was a specialist in 74% of the reports and a general practitioner in 17%. The annual rate of reporting according to medical demography strongly increased for the specialists, especially since 1994. At least one ADR was considered as serious in 44.8% of the reports. The ADRs were most frequently related to nervous system drugs (23%), followed by cardiovascular drugs (19%) and systemic anti-infectives (17%). The latter class had the fastest progression mostly due to antiretroviral therapy since 1996. According to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) coding, the system organ most often reported was skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (29%), followed by nervous system disorders (19%), gastrointestinal disorders (12%), blood and lymphatic system disorders (12%), vascular disorders (12%) and general disorders and administration site conditions (12%). Discussion: All spontaneous reporting systems are affected by under-reporting. One of their goals is to generate early signals, which might be more affected by reporting bias than by under-reporting. Some improvements should be made in the design of the French database, but data collected since 1986 constitute an essential tool for the routine work of the 3 1 pharmacovigilance centres. Conclusion: This first description of the data of the French pharmacovigi lance database involving all drugs and ADRs shows an increasing tendency to reporting
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 740
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Suspected adverse drug reaction reports with oral anticoagulants in Portugal: a pharmacovigilance study
    Caldeira, Daniel
    Rodrigues, Raquel
    Abreu, Daisy
    Anes, Ana Marta
    Rosa, Mario M.
    Ferreira, Joaquim J.
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 17 (04) : 339 - 345
  • [22] Paediatric adverse drug reactions: a review of spontaneous reports registered by a Regional PharmacoVigilance Center
    Foucras, G.
    Rousseau, V.
    Chebane, L.
    Maupiler, M.
    Durrieu, G.
    Montastruc, J. L.
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 28 : 24 - 24
  • [23] Drug Induced Liver Injury: Perspective of the Adverse Drug Reaction Reports to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System from 2010 to 2019
    Nunes, David Ricardo da Conceicao Marcal Alves
    Breton, Michele Claire
    Monteiro, Cristina Sofia de Jesus
    dos Santos, Jorge Luiz
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [24] Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to antimalarial drugs - Analysis of spontaneous reports from the French pharmacovigilance database (1996-2000)
    Angles, A
    Bagheri, H
    Montastruc, JL
    Magnaval, JF
    [J]. PRESSE MEDICALE, 2003, 32 (03): : 106 - 113
  • [25] Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports for neonates and infants in the UK 2001-2010: content and utility analysis
    Hawcutt, Daniel B.
    Russell, Nicki-Jayne
    Maqsood, Hannah
    Kouranloo, Koushan
    Gomberg, Simon
    Waitt, Catriona
    Sharp, Andrew
    Riordan, Andrew
    Turner, Mark A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 82 (06) : 1601 - 1612
  • [26] Assessment of adverse drug reaction related to antidepressants registered in the French pharmacovigilance database
    Gouverneur, A.
    Pageot, C.
    Montastruc, F.
    Pierre, S.
    Rouby, F.
    Miremont-Salame, G.
    Pariente, A.
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 33 : 82 - 82
  • [27] Adverse events to radiopharmaceuticals: evaluation of French pharmacovigilance reports
    Langlet, S.
    Bres, V.
    Couret, I.
    Hillaire-Buys, D.
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 33 : 32 - 32
  • [28] Adverse drug reactions with fatal outcome in the elderly: a 5-year review of spontaneous reports to the Portuguese pharmacovigilance system
    Monteiro, Cristina
    Duarte, Ana Paula
    Alves, Gilberto
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2019, 49 : 174 - 175
  • [29] Gender differences in adverse drug reactions: analysis of spontaneous reports to a Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre in France
    Montastruc, JL
    Lapeyre-Mestre, M
    Bagheri, H
    Fooladi, A
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 16 (05) : 343 - 346
  • [30] Adverse drug reaction related to drug shortage: A retrospective study on the French National Pharmacovigilance Database
    Bourneau-Martin, Delphine
    Babin, Marina
    Grandvuillemin, Aurelie
    Mullet, Charlotte
    Salvo, Francesco
    Singier, Allison
    Cellier, Morgane
    Fresse, Audrey
    de Canecaude, Claire
    Pietri, Tessa
    Drablier, Guillaume
    Geniaux, Helene
    Lagarce, Laurence
    Laroche, Marie-Laure
    Briet, Marie
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 89 (03) : 1080 - 1088