What has changed with riluzole?

被引:0
|
作者
Meininger, V [1 ]
Lacomblez, L [1 ]
Salachas, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, Div Mazarin, Federat Neurol Mazarin, F-75013 Paris, France
关键词
riluzole; sodium channel; glutamate; therapeutic trials;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Riluzole, after two significant trials, was introduced as the first standard treatment of amyotrophic lateral clerosis (ALS) in the early 95'. After 5 years what has changed in the field of ALS? In the field of basic science, riluzole as an active drug has largely contributed to stimulate the research of the possible role of glutamate in the genesis of ALS. However, the apparent simplicity of the relation between the drug and its mechanisms has to modulated in the light of the negativity of other trials (gabapentin) and the display of other mechanisms of the disease and of the compound. Possible relation with other putative mechanisms of ALS, as oxydative stress or growth factors, could be land probably are) also involved. In the field of its activity, riluzole has an impact on the survival rate which has been largely debated. Comparison with historical databases are supporting the results of the two initial trials. Other information have been published supporting the probable activity of the drug on the muscle strength decline, a controversial matter. They strengthen the initial data and give additional reasons to use riluzole as a standard treatment of patients. In the field of the daily care, riluzole provided a real and unique hope for ALS sufferers. Even if its activity is not as complete as patients would have expected, it provides a hope for slowing down the rate of evolution and abolishes the myth of "no hope, no cure" which was the leitmotiv of patients care until recently. We have to better define the mode of administration with regard to the clinical status of the patients (respiratory disorders, fatigue, stiffness). In the field of care givers, riluzole was one major factor which provided the basis for national and international collaborations either for therapeutic trials or for standard of care. It made possible large collaborative programs in and among many countries. We do hope that this impulse will continue and be stimulated by additional results both in the field of basic science and clinical research.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:19 / 22
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Liver abscess in Malaysia: What has changed?
    Thalha, Abdul Malik Mohamed
    Leow, Alex Hwong-Ruey
    Gnanasuntharam, Gnana Kumar
    Goh, Khean Lee
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 : 431 - 431
  • [42] Reply to Greenberg: indeed, what has changed!
    Slovis, Thomas L.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 42 (03) : 387 - 388
  • [43] 25 YEARS OF ABCD: WHAT HAS CHANGED?
    不详
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 24 (04): : 257 - 258
  • [44] Reply to Greenberg: indeed, what has changed!
    Thomas L. Slovis
    Pediatric Radiology, 2012, 42 : 387 - 388
  • [45] Erratum to: Rheumatoid arthritis: what has changed?
    Edith Villeneuve
    Paul Emery
    Skeletal Radiology, 2011, 40 : 141 - 141
  • [46] What is the Iron Triangle, and how has it changed?
    Pollack, Julien
    Helm, Jane
    Adler, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2018, 11 (02) : 527 - 547
  • [47] Perinatal mortality- What has changed?
    Mukherjee, Sharmila B.
    Bandyopadhyay, Tapas
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2016, 53 (03) : 242 - 243
  • [48] Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS: what has changed?
    Liguori, Giorgio
    Galle, Francesca
    EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOSTATISTICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 2 (02): : 53 - 58
  • [49] 10 years of diarrhea: What has changed?
    Jneid, H
    Jain, A
    Thacker, H
    Richter, J
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 17 : 50 - 50
  • [50] One September later, what has changed?
    Beverly, Robert
    Engineered Systems, 2002, 19 (09):