Increasing the public health voice in global decision-making on nutrition labelling

被引:18
|
作者
Thow, Anne Marie [1 ]
Jones, Alexandra [2 ]
Schneider, Carmen Huckel [1 ]
Labonte, Ronald [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Nutrition; Governance; Global standards; Front of pack labelling; CODEX ALIMENTARIUS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1186/s12992-019-0533-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
To respond to the global noncommunicable disease (NCD) crisis, the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), a multilateral United Nations body responsible for work on food standards, is developing global guidance for front of pack (FoP) nutrition labelling. Guidance from Codex regarding FoP nutrition labelling at the global level will almost certainly influence national policy making. This shift in Codex's activities towards standards to address NCDs presents new risks for achievement of public health goals, as a result of the high level of industry involvement in this forum; there is a potential commercial conflict of interest held by manufacturers of products whose consumption could be discouraged by such guidance. In this Commentary, we examine the implications of Codex processes for developing robust global guidance on FoP nutrition labelling and identify opportunities to increase consideration of public health objectives. To date, there has been significantly higher representation of food industry compared to public health actors in Codex discussions on FoP nutrition labelling. Without a strong public health voice in Codex, the industry voice could dominate discussions on FoP nutrition labelling, such that subsequent global guidance prioritises future trade and profits over potential risks to public health. There is currently a critical window of opportunity for public health interests to be prioritised in this multisectoral international forum. The key public health priority for global guidance on FoP nutrition labelling is to ensure protection of policy space for national governments to implement strong and effective regulation, and allow scope for innovation. Public health actors can engage directly with Codex processes, at both the national and global level, and also need to raise awareness among domestic policy makers - including with Ministries of Agriculture and Industry, which often represent countries at Codex - regarding the importance and effectiveness of FoP labelling in NCD prevention. Increased engagement with Codex processes represents a tangible new opportunity to strengthen global governance for public health, and move towards improved coherence between trade policy and health protection goals.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial nutrition: dilemmas in decision-making
    Planas, M
    Camilo, ME
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2002, 21 (04) : 355 - 361
  • [22] Evidence for public health decision-making: towards reliable synthesis
    Waters, Elizabeth
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2009, 87 (03) : 164 - 164
  • [23] Partner influence on health behavior decision-making: Increasing breastfeeding duration
    Rempel, LA
    Rempel, JK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2004, 21 (01) : 92 - 111
  • [24] A Framework for Training Public Health Practitioners in Crisis Decision-Making
    Kayman, Harvey
    Logar, Tea
    [J]. DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2016, 10 (01) : 165 - 173
  • [25] Silent Triage: Public Health decision-making beyond prioritisation
    Kuhn, Eva
    Henke, Oliver
    Evang, Esther
    Falkenberg, Timo
    Bruchhausen, Walter
    Schultz, Andreas
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 8 (02):
  • [26] Conceptualizing the use of public involvement in health policy decision-making
    Li, Kathy K.
    Abelson, Julia
    Giacomini, Mita
    Contandriopoulos, Damien
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2015, 138 : 14 - 21
  • [27] CDC Grand Rounds: Modeling and Public Health Decision-Making
    Fischer, Leah S.
    Santibanez, Scott
    Hatchett, Richard J.
    Jernigan, Daniel B.
    Meyers, Lauren Ancel
    Thorpe, Phoebe G.
    Meltzer, Martin I.
    [J]. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2016, 65 (48): : 1374 - 1377
  • [28] Quantifying the benefits of increasing decision-making frequency for health applications with regular decision epochs
    Zhang, Suyanpeng
    Suen, Sze-Chuan
    Sundaram, Vinay
    Gong, Cynthia L.
    [J]. IISE TRANSACTIONS, 2024,
  • [29] What constitutesfairshared decision-making in global health research collaborations?
    Pratt, Bridget
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2020, 34 (09) : 984 - 993
  • [30] Conditions of Global Health Crisis Decision-Making—An Ethical Analysis
    Elizabeth Fenton
    Kata Chillag
    [J]. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2021, 18 : 395 - 402