Improved governance for energy efficiency in housing

被引:40
|
作者
Visscher, Henk [1 ]
Meijer, Frits [1 ]
Majcen, Dasa [1 ]
Itard, Laure [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, OTB Res Inst Built Environm, Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands
来源
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION | 2016年 / 44卷 / 5-6期
关键词
building control; building regulations; energy performance; governance; housing stock; occupants; performance gap; ASSESSING BUILDING PERFORMANCE; DUTCH DWELLINGS; CONSUMPTION; FEEDBACK; GAP;
D O I
10.1080/09613218.2016.1180808
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Current practices show that the goals of energy saving and CO2 reductions for creating an energy-neutral building stock can only be reached by strict and supportive governmental policies. In Europe the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) and the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) are driving forces for member states to develop and strengthen energy performance regulations both for new buildings (via building approval procedures) and the existing building stock (via energy performance certificates or labels). The effectiveness of these current governance instruments and their impact on actual CO2 reductions are found to be inadequate for ensuring actual (not hypothecated) energy performance is achieved. To realize the very ambitious energy-saving goals a radical rethink of regulatory systems and instruments is necessary. Building performance and the behaviour of the occupants is not well understood by policy-makers. Alternative forms of governance are needed that have more impact on the actual outcomes. Supportive governance to stimulate near-zero renovations in combination with performance guarantees is a promising approach. Furthermore, engagement with occupant practices and behaviours is needed. To ensure accurate outcomes-based governance, a better understanding of building performance and behaviours of occupants must be incorporated.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 561
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Green housing: Toward a new energy efficiency paradox?
    Copiello, Sergio
    Bonifaci, Pietro
    CITIES, 2015, 49 : 76 - 87
  • [42] ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF ULTRA-LOW-COST HOUSING
    MATHEWS, EH
    RICHARDS, PG
    VANWYK, SL
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 30 (03) : 427 - 432
  • [43] The capitalization of energy efficiency: Evidence from the housing market
    Aydin, Erdal
    Brounen, Dirk
    Kok, Nils
    JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2020, 117
  • [44] Tax incentives to modernize the energy efficiency of the housing in Spain
    Villca-Pozo, Milenka
    Pablo Gonzales-Bustos, Juan
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 128 : 530 - 538
  • [45] Achieving affordable housing through energy efficiency strategy
    Copiello, Sergio
    ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 85 : 288 - 298
  • [46] Energy Efficiency Information and Valuation Practices in Rental Housing
    Chegut, Andrea
    Eichholtz, Piet
    Holtermans, Rogier
    Palacios, Juan
    JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 60 (1-2): : 181 - 204
  • [47] Energy efficiency of housing for older citizens: Does it matter?
    Miller, Wendy
    Vine, Desley
    Amin, Zakaria
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 101 : 216 - 224
  • [48] The Regional Governance of Energy-Neutral Housing: Toward a Framework for Analysis
    de Leeuw, Laura
    Groenleer, Martijn
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [49] Governance, technology, and equity: An integrated policy framework for energy efficient housing
    Golubchikov, Oleg
    Deda, Paola
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 41 : 733 - 741
  • [50] Energy efficiency can still be improved
    Lehto-Isokoski, Hanna
    PAPERI JA PUU-PAPER AND TIMBER, 2010, 92 (06): : 40 - 41