Aerobic treatment of dairy wastewater with sequencing batch reactors

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, RH [1 ]
Li, X [1 ]
Collar, CA [1 ]
Fry, RA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
aerobic treatment; dairy wastewater; ammonia; nitrogen; chemical oxygen demand;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Single-stage and two-stage aerobic treatment systems were tested and compared in the laboratory for treating dairy wastewater to remove solids and oxidize ammonia for later nitrogen removal through denitrification. Treating the dairy waster of 20,000 mg/L COD and 540 mg/L NH3-N at five hydraulic retention times (HRTs) varying from 1 to 5 days, the single-stage sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system achieved 68.9% to 85% VS removal from the liquid. A longer HRT resulted in a cleaner liquid effluent with lower solids (TS and VS) contents. It was found that the 5-day HRT was necessary to achieve complete oxidation of ammonia to nitrate. The treatment efficiencies of the two-stage SBR system at 2.5-day HRT (2-day for the first-stage and 0.5-day for the second-stage) were equal to or better than those of the single-stage SBR system at 5-day HRT. This means that the treatment volume of a two-stage system can be 50% less than the volume of a single-stage system. The results also showed that the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) performed better than the completely mixed biofilm reactor (CMBR) in terms of solids and COD removals. Field-testing of a pilot-scale two-stage SBR system confirmed the laboratory research findings and concluded that a single-stage system is good for solids removal but a two-stage system is recommended if ammonia oxidation is also desired.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 554
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Optimizing sequencing batch reactor (SBR) reactor operation for treatment of dairy wastewater with aerobic granular sludge
    Wichern, M.
    Luebken, M.
    Horn, H.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 58 (06) : 1199 - 1206
  • [12] Aerobic Granulation in a Sequencing Batch Reactor for the Treatment of Piggery Wastewater
    Zhang, Dalei
    Wang, Yanan
    Li, Hongwei
    Wang, Shaoran
    Jing, Yumei
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2013, 85 (03) : 239 - 244
  • [13] Effect of pH on Aerobic Granulation and Treatment Performance in Sequencing Batch Reactors
    Rezasoltani, Samira
    Shayegan, Jalal
    Jalali, Sajjad
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 38 (05) : 851 - 858
  • [14] The effect of temperature on slaughterhouse wastewater treatment in anaerobic sequencing batch reactors
    Massé, DI
    Masse, L
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 76 (02) : 91 - 98
  • [15] ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATING CONDITIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF COSMETIC WASTEWATER BY SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS
    Tobajas, Montserrat
    Polo, Alicia M.
    Monsalvo, Victor M.
    Mohedano, Angel F.
    Rodriguez, Juan J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 13 (12): : 2955 - 2962
  • [16] Biological treatment of pulp mill wastewater using sequencing batch reactors
    Dubeski, CV
    Branion, RMR
    Lo, KV
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 36 (07): : 1245 - 1255
  • [17] Treatment of phenolic wastewater by sequencing batch reactors with aerated and unaerated fills
    Yu, HQ
    Gu, GW
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 1996, 16 (07) : 561 - 566
  • [18] Treatment of dairy effluents in an aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactor
    Schwarzenbeck, N
    Borges, JM
    Wilderer, PA
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 66 (06) : 711 - 718
  • [19] Treatment of dairy effluents in an aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactor
    N. Schwarzenbeck
    J. M. Borges
    P. A. Wilderer
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2005, 66 : 711 - 718
  • [20] ANAEROBIC-AEROBIC TREATMENT OF TEXTILE WASTEWATER IN A SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR
    Kanbouchi, Ibtissam
    Souabi, Salah
    Chtaini, Abdessadek
    Aboulhassan, Moulay Abdelaziz
    SCIENTIFIC STUDY AND RESEARCH-CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING BIOTECHNOLOGY FOOD INDUSTRY, 2013, 14 (04): : 207 - 220