Agent-based computational models to explore diffusion of medical innovations among cardiologists

被引:8
|
作者
Borracci, Raul A. [1 ]
Giorgi, Mariano A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Austral Univ, Sch Med, Biostat, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Med Educ & Clin Invest Ctr CEMIC Univ Inst, Hlth Econ & Technol Assessment Unit, Galvan, Argentina
关键词
Medical innovation; Technology; Cardiology; Agent-based modeling; Networks; SOCIAL CONTAGION; DISSEMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.02.008
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: Diffusion of medical innovations among physicians rests on a set of theoretical assumptions, including learning and decision-making under uncertainty, social-normative pressures, medical expert knowledge, competitive concerns, network performance effects, professional autonomy or individualism and scientific evidence. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and test four real data-based, agent-based computational models (ABM) to qualitatively and quantitatively explore the factors associated with diffusion and application of innovations among cardiologists. Methods: Four ABM were developed to study diffusion and application of medical innovations among cardiologists, considering physicians' network connections, leaders' opinions, "adopters' categories", physicians' autonomy, scientific evidence, patients' pressure, affordability for the end-user population, and promotion from companies. Results: Simulations demonstrated that social imitation among local cardiologists was sufficient for innovation diffusion, as long as opinion leaders did not act as detractors of the innovation. Even in the absence of full scientific evidence to support innovation, up to one-fifth of cardiologists could accept it when local leaders acted as promoters. Patients' pressure showed a large effect size (Cohen's d > 1.2) on the proportion of cardiologists applying an innovation. Two qualitative patterns (speckled and granular) appeared associated to traditional Gompertz and sigmoid cumulative distributions. Conclusions: These computational models provided a semiquantitative insight on the emergent collective behavior of a physician population facing the acceptance or refusal of medical innovations. Inclusion in the models of factors related to patients' pressure and accesibility to medical coverage revealed the contrast between accepting and effectively adopting a new product or technology for population health care.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 165
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Agent-Based Computational Epidemiological Modeling
    Bissett, Keith R.
    Cadena, Jose
    Khan, Maleq
    Kuhlman, Chris J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, 2021, 101 (03) : 303 - 327
  • [33] Introduction: Agent-based computational demography
    Billari, FC
    Ongaro, F
    Prskawetz, A
    [J]. AGENT-BASED COMPUTATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY: USING SIMULATION TO IMPROVE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF DEMOGRAPHIC BEHAVIOUR, 2003, : 1 - 17
  • [34] Agent-Based Computational Epidemiological Modeling
    Keith R. Bissett
    Jose Cadena
    Maleq Khan
    Chris J. Kuhlman
    [J]. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 2021, 101 : 303 - 327
  • [35] Scalable agent-based simulation - Distributed simulation of agent-based models
    Pawlaszczyk D.
    [J]. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 2010, 24 (2) : 161 - 163
  • [36] Agent-Based Models and Microsimulation
    Heard, Daniel
    Dent, Gelonia
    Schifeling, Tracy
    Banks, David
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 2, 2015, 2 : 259 - 272
  • [37] Learning in agent-based models
    Kirman A.
    [J]. Eastern Economic Journal, 2011, 37 (1) : 20 - 27
  • [38] Econophysics of Agent-Based Models
    LeBaron, Blake
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2014, 52 (03) : 855 - 858
  • [39] Features of Agent-based Models
    Heckel, Reiko
    Kurz, Alexander
    Chattoe-Brown, Edmund
    [J]. ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2017, (263): : 31 - 37
  • [40] Agent-based models in sociology
    Bianchi, Federico
    Squazzoni, Flaminio
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2015, 7 (04): : 284 - 306