The immersed boundary method: A projection approach

被引:433
|
作者
Taira, Kunihiko [1 ]
Colonius, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Div Engn & Appl Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
关键词
immersed boundary method; fractional step method; projection method; staggered grid; finite-volume method; incompressible viscous flow;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2007.03.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A new formulation of the immersed boundary method with a structure algebraically identical to the traditional fractional step method is presented for incompressible flow over bodies with prescribed surface motion. Like previous methods, a boundary force is applied at the immersed surface to satisfy the no-slip constraint. This extra constraint can be added to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations by introducing regularization and interpolation operators. The current method gives prominence to the role of the boundary force acting as a Lagrange multiplier to satisfy the no-slip condition. This role is analogous to the effect of pressure on the momentum equation to satisfy the divergence-free constraint. The current immersed boundary method removes slip and non-divergence-free components of the velocity field through a projection. The boundary force is determined implicitly without any constitutive relations allowing the present formulation to use larger CFL numbers compared to some past methods. Symmetry and positive-definiteness of the system are preserved such that the conjugate gradient method can be used to solve for the flow field. Examples show that the current formulation achieves second-order temporal accuracy and better than first-order spatial accuracy in L-2-norms for one- and two-dimensional test problems. Results from two-dimensional simulations of flows over stationary and moving cylinders are in good agreement with those from previous experimental and numerical studies. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2118 / 2137
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Moving immersed boundary method
    Cai, Shang-Gui
    Ouahsine, Abdellatif
    Favier, Julien
    Hoarau, Yannick
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2017, 85 (05) : 288 - 323
  • [22] From immersed boundary method to immersed continuum methods
    Wang, X. Sheldon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR MULTISCALE COMPUTATIONAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 4 (01) : 127 - 145
  • [23] Strongly coupled dynamics of fluids and rigid-body systems with the immersed boundary projection method
    Wang, Chengjie
    Eldredge, Jeff D.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2015, 295 : 87 - 113
  • [24] On the immersed boundary method: Finite element versus finite volume approach
    Frisani, Angelo
    Hassan, Yassin A.
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2015, 121 : 51 - 67
  • [25] A Resolved CFD-DEM Approach Based on Immersed Boundary Method
    Mao J.
    Xiao J.
    Zhao L.
    Di Y.
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2023, 57 (08): : 988 - 995
  • [26] MASS PRESERVING DISTRIBUTED LANGRAGE MULTIPLIER APPROACH TO IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHOD
    Boffi, Daniele
    Cavallini, Nicola
    Gardini, Francesca
    Gastaldi, Lucia
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR COUPLED PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING V, 2013, : 323 - 334
  • [27] An extension of the immersed boundary method based on the distributed Lagrange multiplier approach
    Feldman, Yuri
    Gulberg, Yosef
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2016, 322 : 248 - 266
  • [28] ON THE IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHOD: FINITE ELEMENT VERSUS FINITE VOLUME APPROACH
    Frisani, Angelo
    Hassan, Yassin A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND THE ASME 2012 POWER CONFERENCE - 2012, VOL 5, 2012, : 535 - 547
  • [29] On the accuracy of direct forcing immersed boundary methods with projection methods
    Guy, Robert D.
    Hartenstine, David A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2010, 229 (07) : 2479 - 2496
  • [30] A hybrid immersed boundary and immersed interface method for electrohydrodynamic simulations
    Hu, Wei-Fan
    Lai, Ming-Chih
    Young, Yuan-Nan
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2015, 282 : 47 - 61