Why Are We Doing This? And What Should We Be Doing?

被引:0
|
作者
Warren, Linda P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Axtell, Rich [4 ]
机构
[1] Launch Consulting Inc, Richmond, VA USA
[2] AWWAs Emergency Preparedness & Secur Comm, Itasca, IL USA
[3] Source Water Protect Comm, Guelph, ON, Canada
[4] APEMS Solut, Maple Valley, WA USA
来源
关键词
SAFETY ACT;
D O I
10.5942/jawwa.2016.108.0163
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Conducting an risk analysis (RA) allows a utility to consider a broad spectrum of worst reasonable threats that may compromise the utility's mission of providing drinking water and/or treating wastewater. The RA assigns a monetized value for risks against critical assets such as pump stations, and that value enables utility managers to make informed decisions. There is a standard available to follow when conducting an RA: the ANSI/AWWA J100-10 Risk and Resilience Management of Water and Wastewater Systems (AWWA 2010). There are also software tools to help with the process. Taken together, the RA and stand-alone (SA) provide a comprehensive view of the risks and countermeasures that can be implemented to address the myriad threats facing a water or wastewater system. In the RA, it's important to remember that cyber-related physical attacks may occur, and physically related cyberattacks may occur. Then the SA uses these threats to determine, in detail, what type of measures will counteract them. One approach to conducting SAs, the CARVER method, evaluates Criticality, Accessibility, Recoverability, Vulnerability, Effect, and Recognizability (CARVER).
引用
收藏
页码:14 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Qualification and reliability tests: What are we doing and why?
    Munroe, RA
    50TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE - 2000 PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 1576 - 1581
  • [42] Genomic counselling: what are we doing and what do we think we should be doing? - A professional status survey of genetic counsellors in Australasia
    Nisselle, A.
    Macciocca, I.
    Dunlop, K.
    Metcalfe, S.
    Gaff, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 726 - 726
  • [43] WE SHOULD BE DOING BOTH
    SMITH, DA
    PENNSYLVANIA MEDICINE, 1978, 81 (12) : 29 - 29
  • [44] THE RESEARCH WE SHOULD BE DOING
    FRIEDMAN, CP
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1994, 69 (06) : 455 - 457
  • [45] On technology, science, and tea: What are we doing and why?
    Ausman, JI
    SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (06): : 406 - 407
  • [46] Evaluating for Lynch Syndrome: What Are We Doing and How Are We Doing It?
    Hissong, Erika
    Chen, Yao-Tseng
    Yantiss, Rhonda
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 268 - 269
  • [47] COVID-19 vaccine: what are we doing and what should we do?
    Candelli, Marcello
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (05): : 569 - 570
  • [48] Routine fetal cardiac screening: what are we doing and what should we do?
    Sharland, G
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2004, 24 (13) : 1123 - 1129
  • [49] Knowing What We Do and Doing What We Should: Quality Assurance in Hemodialysis
    Alquist, Maria
    Bosch, Juan P.
    Barth, Claudia
    Combe, Christian
    Daugirdas, John T.
    Hegbrant, Jorgen B. A.
    Martin, Georges
    McIntyre, Christopher W.
    O'Donoghue, Donal J.
    Rodriguez, Hector J.
    Santoro, Antonio
    Tattersall, James E.
    Vantard, Georges
    Van Wyck, David B.
    Canaud, Bernard
    NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 126 (03): : 135 - 143
  • [50] Eradication or decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage:: What are we doing and why are we doing it?
    Bradley, Suzanne F.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 44 (02) : 186 - 189