Community Protection versus Individual Healing: Two Traditions in Community Mental Health

被引:4
|
作者
Yanos, Philip T. [1 ,3 ]
Knight, Edward L. [2 ]
Vayshenker, Beth [3 ]
Gonzales, Lauren [4 ]
DeLuca, Joseph S. [3 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Psychol, John Jay Coll Criminal Justice, 524 W 59th St, New York, NY 10019 USA
[2] Hlth Complementum, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[3] John Jay Coll Criminal Justice, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
ASSISTED OUTPATIENT TREATMENT; PERCEIVED COERCION; KENDRAS LAW; JUSTICE; BURNOUT; STIGMA; COURT;
D O I
10.1002/bsl.2297
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article identifies two major traditions that drive the mandate for a community mental health care systemcommunity protection and individual healing. It discusses the historical antecedents of these two traditions and how these traditions relate to different visions of what the common good means. It then discusses how they both operate in the current US-based system, creating inherent conflicts and tensions, and gives specific examples from the personal and professional experiences of the authors. The article proposes ways to reduce the tension and discusses what sacrifices and compromises this resolution would entail for the US community mental health system. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 302
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条