Detection of foodborne bacterial zoonoses by fluorescence in situ hybridization

被引:11
|
作者
Rohde, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Hammerl, Jens Andre [1 ]
Al Dahouk, Sascha [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Inst Risk Assessment, Diedersdorfer Weg 1, D-12277 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Biol Chem & Pharm, Takustr 3, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Foodborne zoonoses; Bacteria; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; FISH; Detection; Membrane filtration; Campylobacter; 16S RIBOSOMAL-RNA; LISTERIA SPP; IDENTIFICATION; FISH; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; CAMPYLOBACTER; ENUMERATION; WATER; PATHOGEN; INCREASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.05.008
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The efficient and timely detection of bacterial pathogens remains a major public health concern throughout the world. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a promising tool to detect bacteria since it incorporates the advantages of rapid detection methods with the live/dead differentiation capacity of the gold standard culture methods. However, multiplexing pathogen detection, weak FISH signals and the establishment of a quantitative and sensitive direct enumeration approach remain troublesome obstacles for a widespread use in food microbiology. Therefore, we developed and tested a comprehensive set of highly specific multiplex-FISH tests for the simultaneous detection of various foodborne bacterial zoonoses, including important pathogens like Salmonella enterica, thermophilic Campylobacter and Listeria monocytogenes. The detection of thermophilic Campylobacter spp., the most frequent bacterial zoonosis in the EU, in artificially spiked chicken breast by FISH proved to be as sensitive as the conventional ISO standard, but results were available much earlier. Strongly enhanced FISH signals for Campylobacter spp., enabling detection in matrices with high background fluorescence, were accomplished by employing several probes for this target group. For the direct detection of bacteria, independent of cultural enrichment, filtration proved to be appropriate although this method is less sensitive and thus primarily suitable for higher bacterial loads. The type of membrane filter as well as the fluorescence channel significantly influenced the efficiency of detection. Furthermore, the implementation of GFP-expressing bacteria as a quantitative standard allowed the enumeration of target pathogens after filtration. In summary, our results demonstrate the applicability of FISH for food microbiology and offer new solutions for prevalent problems in FISH-testing. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 305
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Digital mapping of bacterial artificial chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Jackson, SA
    Dong, FG
    Jiang, JM
    [J]. PLANT JOURNAL, 1999, 17 (05): : 581 - 587
  • [12] Oncogene amplification detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
    Ooi, A
    [J]. ACTA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOCHEMICA, 2001, 34 (06) : 391 - 397
  • [13] Aneuploidy detection in porcine gametes by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Vozdova, M
    Kubickova, S
    Machatkova, M
    Jokesova, E
    Rubes, J
    [J]. CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1999, 85 (1-2): : 97 - 97
  • [14] Detection of Viral RNA by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH)
    Vyboh, Kishanda
    Ajamian, Lara
    Mouland, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2012, (63):
  • [15] Detection of dengue group viruses by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Vincent Raquin
    Martin Wannagat
    Karima Zouache
    Catherine Legras-Lachuer
    Claire Valiente Moro
    Patrick Mavingui
    [J]. Parasites & Vectors, 5
  • [16] Detection of dengue group viruses by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Raquin, Vincent
    Wannagat, Martin
    Zouache, Karima
    Legras-Lachuer, Catherine
    Moro, Claire Valiente
    Mavingui, Patrick
    [J]. PARASITES & VECTORS, 2012, 5
  • [17] Detection of newborn aneuploidy by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Jalal, SM
    Law, ME
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 72 (08) : 705 - 710
  • [18] Detection of new chromosomal insertions by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Jarosova, M
    Indrak, K
    Faber, E
    Horakova, J
    Krahulova, M
    Souskova, I
    Behal, K
    Petrasova, I
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 93 : 1244 - 1244
  • [19] Utility of chromogenic in situ hybridization for detection of EGFR amplification in glioblastoma: Comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Fischer, Ingeborg
    De La Cruz, Clarissa
    Jenkins, Robert B.
    Aldape, Kenneth
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 9 (04) : 544 - 544
  • [20] Phylogenetic analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of archaeal and bacterial endosymbionts in the anaerobic ciliate Trimyema compressum
    Shinzato, Naoya
    Watanabe, Ichiro
    Meng, Xian-Ying
    Sekiguchi, Yuji
    Tamaki, Hideyuki
    Matsui, Toru
    Kamagata, Yoichi
    [J]. MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2007, 54 (04) : 627 - 636