Treatment of produced water originated from oil and gas production wells: a pilot study and cost analysis

被引：21
|
作者：
Ersahin, Mustafa Evren [1 ,2 ]
Ozgun, Hale [1 ,2 ]
Kaya, Recep [1 ,2 ]
Mutlu, Borte Kose [1 ,2 ]
Kinaci, Cumali [1 ]
Koyuncu, Ismail [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Civil Engn Fac, Environm Engn Dept, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Natl Res Ctr Membrane Technol, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
来源：
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH | 2018年 / 25卷 / 07期
关键词：
Cost analysis; Pilot plant; Produced water; Reverse osmosis; Ultrafiltration; FIELD-PRODUCED WATER; ANAEROBIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; REVERSE-OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; WASTE-WATER; REMOVAL; DESALINATION; NANOFILTRATION; HYDROCARBONS;
D O I：
10.1007/s11356-017-0961-7
中图分类号：
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号：
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要：
Produced water originated from oil and gas production wells was treated by a pilot-scale system including pre-treatment (chemical precipitation), pre-filtration, and post-filtration units. Pre-filtration unit consisted of sand filter, granulated activated carbon (GAC) filter, and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. Post-filtration unit included reverse osmosis (RO) membrane unit. In this study, two different RO membranes including sea water (SW) and brackish water (BW) membranes were comparatively evaluated in terms of treatment and filtration performance. Besides, a cost analysis was conducted for a real scale RO membrane unit by using the data obtained from the pilot plant study. Average fluxes of 12.7 and 9.4 L/m(2) h were obtained by SW and BW membrane units, respectively. Higher COD and conductivity removal efficiencies were obtained by SW membrane in comparison to BW membrane. Total cost of 0.88 a,notsign/m(3) was estimated for a RO plant treating produced water with a flowrate capacity of 300 m(3)/d.
引用
收藏
页码：6398 / 6406
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of Simulated Oil and Gas Produced Water via Pilot-Scale Rhizofiltration and Constructed Wetlands
    Clay, Lucas
    Pichtel, John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (01) : 185 - 198
  • [22] Treatment of produced water from polymer flooding in oil production by ceramic membranes
    Weschenfelder, S. E.
    Fonseca, M. J. C.
    Borges, C. P.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 196
  • [23] Influence of wellhead pressure and water cut in the optimization of oil production from gas lifted wells
    Hari, S.
    Krishna, Shanker
    Patel, Manav
    Bhatia, Pooja
    Vij, Rakesh Kumar
    PETROLEUM RESEARCH, 2022, 7 (02) : 253 - 262
  • [24] Influence of wellhead pressure and water cut in the optimization of oil production from gas lifted wells
    SHari
    Shanker Krishna
    Manav Patel
    Pooja Bhatia
    Rakesh Kumar Vij
    Petroleum Research, 2022, (02) : 253 - 262
  • [25] Multifunctional water treatment system for oil and gas-produced water
    Ali, Sattar
    Ijaola, Ahmed Olanrewaju
    Asmatulu, Eylem
    SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 7 (06)
  • [26] Multifunctional water treatment system for oil and gas-produced water
    Sattar Ali
    Ahmed Olanrewaju Ijaola
    Eylem Asmatulu
    Sustainable Water Resources Management, 2021, 7
  • [27] Geothermal heat production from abandoned oil and gas wells
    DGMK Forschungsbericht, 2007, 654
  • [28] SENSOR DETERMINES AMOUNTS OF OIL, GAS AND WATER FROM WELLS
    YOUNG, DA
    RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 1984, 26 (12): : 64 - 64
  • [29] Benefits of polymeric membranes in Oil and Gas produced water treatment
    Sutton-Sharp, E.
    Ravereau, J.
    Guennec, M.
    Brehant, A.
    Bonnard, R.
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 13 (02): : 303 - 311
  • [30] Shale gas and oil flowback and produced water modeling and treatment
    Tomson, Mason
    Zhang, Zhang
    Dai, Zhaoyi
    Bolanos, Valerie
    Kan, Amy
    Yan, Fei
    Tomson, Ross
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 249
12345