Significance of dissolved methane in effluents of anaerobically treated low strength wastewater and potential for recovery as an energy product: A review

被引:203
|
作者
Crone, Brian C. [1 ,2 ]
Garland, Jay L. [1 ]
Sorial, George A. [2 ]
Vane, Leland M. [3 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Off Res & Dev, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Biomed Chem & Environm Engn, POB 210012, Cincinnati, OH 45220 USA
[3] US Environm Protect Agcy Lab, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Off Res & Dev, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
基金
美国国家环境保护局;
关键词
Anaerobic treatment; Bioreactor; Dissolved methane; Degassing; Membrane; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR TREATMENT; RAW DOMESTIC SEWAGE; HOLLOW-FIBER; DEGASSING MEMBRANE; GREENHOUSE-GAS; BIOLOGICAL OXIDATION; REACTOR; EMISSIONS; REMOVAL; BIOGAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The need for energy efficient Domestic Wastewater (DWW) treatment is increasing annually with population growth and expanding global energy demand. Anaerobic treatment of low strength DWW produces methane which can be used to as an energy product. Temperature sensitivity, low removal efficiencies (Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Suspended Solids (SS), and Nutrients), alkalinity demand, and potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have limited its application to warmer climates. Although well designed anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (AnMBRs) are able to effectively treat DWW at psychrophilic temperatures (10-30 degrees C), lower temperatures increase methane solubility leading to increased energy losses in the form of dissolved methane in the effluent. Estimates of dissolved methane losses are typically based on concentrations calculated using Henry's Law but advection limitations can lead to supersaturation of methane between 1.34 and 6.9 times equilibrium concentrations and 11-100% of generated methane being lost in the effluent. In well mixed systems such as AnMBRs which use biogas sparging to control membrane fouling, actual concentrations approach equilibrium values. Non-porous membranes have been used to recover up to 92.6% of dissolved methane and well suited for degassing effluents of Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactors which have considerable solids and organic contents and can cause pore wetting and clogging in microporous membrane modules. Micro porous membranes can recover up to 98.9% of dissolved methane in AnMBR effluents which have low COD and SS concentrations. Sequential Down-flow Hanging Sponge (DHS) reactors have been used to recover between 57 and 88% of dissolved methane from Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor effluent at concentrations of greater than 30% and oxidize the rest for a 99% removal of total dissolved methane. They can also remove 90% of suspended solids and COD in UASB effluents and produce a high quality effluent. In situ degassing, can increase process stability, COD removal, biomass retention, and headspace methane concentrations. A model for estimating energy consumption associated with membrane-based dissolved methane recovery predicts that recovered dissolved and headspace methane may provide all the energy required for operation of an anaerobic system treating DWW at psychrophilic temperatures. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 531
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] Wetting- and fouling-resistant hollow fiber membranes for dissolved methane recovery from anaerobic wastewater treatment effluents
    Sethunga, G. S. M. D. P.
    Karahan, H. Enis
    Wang, Rong
    Bae, Tae-Hyun
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2021, 617
  • [12] Estimates of methane loss and energy recovery potential in anaerobic reactors treating domestic wastewater
    Lobato, L. C. S.
    Chernicharo, C. A. L.
    Souza, C. L.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 66 (12) : 2745 - 2753
  • [13] Photoelectrochemical methane production achieved energy recovery from wastewater with low organic concentration
    Hu, Andong
    Fu, Tao
    Ye, Jie
    Huang, Yuefei
    Zhou, Shungui
    Li, Bing
    Wang, Guangqian
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 500
  • [14] Recovery of dissolved methane from wastewater using omniphobic membranes: Maximizing the energy benefits towards water sustainability
    Li, Xuesong
    Dutta, Abhishek
    Dong, Qirong
    Rollings-Scattergood, Sasha
    Lee, Jongho
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [15] Monte Carlo-based model for estimating methane generation potential and electric energy recovery in swine wastewater treated in UASB systems
    Silva, Thobias Pereira
    de Oliveira, Mauricio Guimaraes
    Mourao, Jose Marcos Marques
    dos Santos, Andre Bezerra
    Pereira, Erlon Lopes
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2023, 51
  • [16] Biochemical Methane Potential of Microalgae Cultivated in High-Strength Beverage Wastewater: Implications for Energy Enhancement
    Hasanath, Md Abul
    Chatterjee, Pritha
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [17] Nutrient removal and energy consumption of aerobic granule system treating low-strength wastewater at low dissolved oxygen conditions
    Zuo, Jinlong
    Li, Junsheng
    Xia, Zhi
    Tan, Chong
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2021, 212 : 121 - 128
  • [18] Removal of residual dissolved methane gas in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating low-strength wastewater at low temperature with degassing membrane
    Bandara, Wasala M. K. R. T. W.
    Satoh, Hisashi
    Sasakawa, Manabu
    Nakahara, Yoshihito
    Takahashi, Masahiro
    Okabe, Satoshi
    WATER RESEARCH, 2011, 45 (11) : 3533 - 3540
  • [19] Simultaneous dissolved methane and nitrogen removal from low-strength wastewater using anaerobic granule-based sequencing batch reactor
    Liu, Tao
    Hu, Shihu
    Yuan, Zhiguo
    Guo, Jianhua
    WATER RESEARCH, 2023, 242
  • [20] Energy recovery from wastewater microalgae through anaerobic digestion process: Methane potential, continuous reactor operation and modelling aspects
    Tsapekos, P.
    Kougias, P. G.
    Alvarado-Morales, M.
    Kovalovszki, A.
    Corbiere, M.
    Angelidaki, I.
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 139 : 1 - 7