Abel inversion applied to a transient laser induced plasma: implications from plasma modeling

被引:23
|
作者
Gornushkin, I. B. [1 ]
Shabanov, S. V. [3 ]
Panne, U. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] BAM Fed Inst Mat Res & Testing, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Dept Chem, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Math, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
EMISSION; SPARK; LINE;
D O I
10.1039/c1ja10044k
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We test the effects of non-uniformity, non-transparency, and non-stationarity of a laser-induced plasma on the results obtained by the Abel inversion method. The method is commonly used for obtaining spatially resolved emissivity of axially symmetric non-homogeneous radiating objects. Besides the axial symmetry, the plasma is assumed to be optically thin. As the method addresses a certain plasma state, the plasma is required to be stationary during measurements. It is difficult to satisfy the aforementioned conditions for transient laser induced plasmas. As such the plasmas are not stationary; they have steep gradients of thermodynamic parameters that rapidly vary during the plasma evolution. Therefore, any conclusion based on time-integrated measurements and the corresponding data processing should account for these effects. In this work, we use the collision-dominated plasma model to generate time- and spatially resolved synthetic spectra. The spectra are processed by executing the Abel inversion using two numerical algorithms. Thus obtained spatially resolved plasma parameters ( emissivity, temperature, and number density) are compared with the exact parameters used to set up the model. In doing so, the accuracy of the Abel inversion method is assessed. Special attention is paid to the dynamic aspect of the expanding plasma and possible errors which result from time-integrated measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:1457 / 1465
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Results of modeling laser-induced plasma in pulsed laser deposition
    Granse, G
    Vollmar, S
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 1996, 24 (01) : 47 - 48
  • [32] Computer method for Abel inversion for toroidal: Coordinates and its application to plasma diagnostics
    Seki, M
    Himeno, S
    FUSION TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (03): : 333 - 337
  • [33] Measurement of transient electric charge signals induced by a laser plasma plume
    Kano, S
    Enomoto, Y
    Aya, N
    Ichikawa, N
    Shimura, H
    Iwamoto, H
    LASER MATERIALS PROCESSING CONFERENCE, PTS 1 & 2: ICALEO '97, 1997, : C112 - C121
  • [34] Modeling of plasma distortions by laser-induced ablation spectroscopy (LIAS) and implications for the interpretation of LIAS measurements
    Tokar, M. Z.
    Gierse, N.
    Philipps, V.
    Samm, U.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2015, 55 (11)
  • [35] TRANSIENT MODELING OF RAILGUN PLASMA ARMATURES
    ROLADER, GE
    BATTEH, JH
    POWELL, JD
    DESAI, PV
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1989, 25 (01) : 489 - 494
  • [36] 2D modeling of laser induced plasma expansion
    Le, HC
    Zeitoun, D
    Burtschell, Y
    Marine, W
    Sentis, M
    Dreyfus, RW
    ADVANCED LASER PROCESSING OF MATERIALS - FUNDAMENTALS AND APPLICATIONS, 1996, 397 : 75 - 80
  • [37] Transient thermoelastic response of nanofilms under radiation heating from pulsed laser-induced plasma
    Peri, M. D. Murthy
    Zhou, Dong
    Varghese, Vin
    Cetinkaya, Cetin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, 2008, 21 (01) : 116 - 122
  • [38] Curve of growth methodology applied to laser-induced plasma emission spectroscopy
    Gornushkin, IB
    Anzano, JM
    King, LA
    Smith, BW
    Omenetto, N
    Winefordner, JD
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 1999, 54 (3-4) : 491 - 503
  • [39] Curve of growth methodology applied to laser-induced plasma emission spectroscopy
    Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States
    Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc., 3 (491-503):
  • [40] Stimulated emission in aluminum laser-induced plasma: kinetic model of population inversion
    Gornushkin, Igor
    Glaus, Reto
    Nagli, Lev
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2017, 56 (03) : 695 - 701