Imaging Study of Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Usefulness of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging

被引:288
|
作者
Sano, Katsuhiro [1 ]
Ichikawa, Tomoaki [1 ]
Motosugi, Utaroh [1 ]
Sou, Hironobu [1 ]
Muhi, Ali M. [1 ]
Matsuda, Masanori [2 ]
Nakano, Masayuki [5 ]
Sakamoto, Michiie [6 ]
Nakazawa, Tadao [3 ]
Asakawa, Masami [2 ]
Fujii, Hideki [2 ]
Kitamura, Takatoshi [4 ]
Enomoto, Nobuyuki [4 ]
Araki, Tsutomu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Radiol, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
[2] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Surg 1, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
[3] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Pathol, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
[4] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Internal Med 1, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
[5] Tokyo Womens Med Coll, Yachiyo Med Ctr, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Yachiyo, Japan
[6] Keio Univ, Dept Pathol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
GD-EOB-DTPA; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON-OXIDE; FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION; SIGNAL-INTENSITY; CT; HEPATOCARCINOGENESIS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.11101840
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe imaging findings of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, dynamic contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT), CT during arterial portography (CTAP), and CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) and to compare the diagnostic performance of each modality for small (<= 2 cm) HCC. Materials and Methods: The institute ethics committee deemed study approval unnecessary. One hundred eight resected small lesions in 64 patients were diagnosed as a dysplastic nodule (ON) (n = 12), progressed HCC (n = 66), or early HCC (n = 30). All but two patients underwent all imaging examinations. The imaging characteristics of the lesions with each modality were determined. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the modalities, two radiologists graded the presence or HCC with use of a five-point confidence scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)), sensitivity, and specificity of each modality were compared. Results: The imaging features that are statistically significant for differentiating an early HCC from a ON include fat-containing lesions at dual-echo T1-weighted MR imaging (seen in 16 of the 30 early HCCs and none of the DNs), low attenuation at unenhanced CT (seen in 13 of the 30 early HCCs and none of the DNs), low attenuation at CTAP (seen in 11 of the 30 early HCCs and none of the DNs), and low signal intensity at hepatocyte phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (seen in 29 of the 30 early HCCs and none of the DNs). The diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (A(z), 0.98 and 0.99) was significantly greater than that of contrast-enhanced CT (A(z), 0.87) and CTHA-CTAP (A(z), 0.85 and 0.86) owing to its significantly higher sensitivity (P < .001). Conclusion: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging is the most useful imaging technique for evaluating small HCC, including early HCC. (C) RSNA, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:834 / 844
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnostic Accuracy of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging
    Kim, Jae Hyun
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Lee, Kyung Bun
    Han, Joon Koo
    Choi, Byung Ihn
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 279 (03) : 773 - 783
  • [22] The capsule appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging Correlation with pathology and dynamic CT
    Kim, Bohyun
    Lee, Jei Hee
    Kim, Jai Keun
    Kim, Hye Jin
    Kim, Young Bae
    Lee, Dakeun
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (25)
  • [23] Hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical significance of signal heterogeneity in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging
    Fujita, Nobuhiro
    Nishie, Akihiro
    Kubo, Yuichiro
    Asayama, Yoshiki
    Ushijima, Yasuhiro
    Takayama, Yukihisa
    Moirta, Koichiro
    Shirabe, Ken
    Aishima, Shinichi
    Honda, Hiroshi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (01) : 211 - 220
  • [24] Qualitative and Quantitative Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging Helps Subtype Hepatocellular Adenomas
    Tse, Justin R.
    Naini, Bita V.
    Lu, David S. K.
    Raman, Steven S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 279 (01) : 118 - 127
  • [25] Appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepato-biliary phase MR imaging: a systematic review
    Paola Erra
    Marta Puglia
    Alfonso Ragozzino
    Simone Maurea
    Raffaele Liuzzi
    Giuseppe Sabino
    Luigi Barbuto
    Alberto Cuocolo
    Massimo Imbriaco
    La radiologia medica, 2015, 120 : 1002 - 1011
  • [26] Appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepato-biliary phase MR imaging: a systematic review
    Erra, Paola
    Puglia, Marta
    Ragozzino, Alfonso
    Maurea, Simone
    Liuzzi, Raffaele
    Sabino, Giuseppe
    Barbuto, Luigi
    Cuocolo, Alberto
    Imbriaco, Massimo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (11): : 1002 - 1011
  • [27] Clinical value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma - with a special emphasis on early hepatocellular carcinoma
    Matsuda, Masanori
    WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 7 (30) : 2933 - 2939
  • [28] Recent Advances in the Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    LIVER CANCER, 2016, 5 (01) : 67 - 87
  • [29] Diagnostic Performance of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Liver MR Imaging versus Multidetector CT in the Detection of Dysplastic Nodules and Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kim, Bo Ram
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Hur, Bo Yun
    Suh, Kyung Suk
    Yi, Nam-Joon
    Lee, Kyung Boon
    Han, Joon Koo
    RADIOLOGY, 2017, 285 (01) : 134 - 146
  • [30] Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma and hypovascular hepatocellular nodules
    Di Pietropaolo, Marco
    Briani, Chiara
    Federici, Giulia Francesca
    Marignani, Massimo
    Begini, Paola
    Delle Fave, Gianfranco
    Iannicelli, Elsa
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (03) : 468 - 475