Status Differences in Target-Specific Prosocial Behavior and Aggression

被引:21
|
作者
Closson, Leanna M. [1 ]
Hymel, Shelley [2 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Univ, Dept Psychol, 923 Robie St, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Educ & Counselling Psychol & Special Educ, 2125 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Aggression; Prosocial behavior; Likeability; Popularity; Dominance; Early adolescence; SOCIAL-STATUS; EARLY ADOLESCENCE; DEVELOPMENTAL-CHANGES; RESOURCE CONTROL; PEER RELATIONS; MIDDLE SCHOOL; POPULARITY; DOMINANCE; GIRLS; VICTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10964-016-0481-7
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Previous studies exploring the link between social status and behavior have predominantly utilized measures that do not provide information regarding toward whom aggression or prosocial behavior is directed. Using a contextualized target-specific approach, this study examined whether high-and low-status adolescents behave differently toward peers of varying levels of status. Participants, aged 11-15 (N = 426, 53 % females), completed measures assessing aggression and prosocial behavior toward each same-sex grademate. A distinct pattern of findings emerged regarding the likeability, popularity, and dominance status of adolescents and their peer targets. Popular adolescents reported more direct aggression, indirect aggression, and prosocial behavior toward popular peers than did unpopular adolescents. Well-accepted adolescents reported more prosocial behavior toward a wider variety of peers than did rejected adolescents. Finally, compared to subordinate adolescents, dominant adolescents reported greater direct and indirect aggression toward dominant than subordinate peers. The results highlight the importance of studying target-specific behavior to better understand the status-behavior link.
引用
收藏
页码:1836 / 1848
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Design and synthesis of target-specific contrast agents
    Dirksen, Anouk
    Langereis, Sander
    de Waal, Bas F. M.
    van Genderen, Marcel H. P.
    Meijer, E. W.
    Adriaens, Wencke
    Hackeng, Tilman M.
    UNDERSTANDING BIOLOGY USING PEPTIDES, 2006, : 675 - +
  • [42] Target-specific differences in somatodendritic morphology of layer V pyramidal neurons in rat motor cortex
    Gao, WJ
    Zheng, ZH
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2004, 476 (02) : 174 - 185
  • [43] Target-specific alterations in the VIP inhibitory drive to hippocampal GABAergic cells after status epilepticus
    David, Linda Suzanne
    Topolnik, Lisa
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2017, 292 : 102 - 112
  • [44] Becoming prosocial: The consistency of individual differences in early prosocial behavior
    Schachner, Abby C. W.
    Newton, Emily K.
    Thompson, Ross A.
    Goodman-Wilson, Miranda
    EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2018, 43 : 42 - 51
  • [45] Correction to: Social status and prosocial behavior
    Jin Di Zheng
    Arthur Schram
    Tianle Song
    Experimental Economics, 2024, 27 (2) : 489 - 489
  • [46] New cancer therapeutics: target-specific in, cytotoxics out?
    Broxterman, HJ
    Georgopapadakou, NH
    DRUG RESISTANCE UPDATES, 2004, 7 (02) : 79 - 87
  • [47] LYSOSOMAL LABILIZATION - RAPID, TARGET-SPECIFIC EFFECT OF ACTH
    SZEGO, CM
    RAKICH, DR
    SEELER, BJ
    GROSS, RS
    ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1974, 95 (03) : 863 - 874
  • [48] Target-specific glioma therapy in an immunocompetent mouse model
    Weissenberger, J.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 8 (04) : 329 - 330
  • [49] An array of target-specific screening strains for antibacterial discovery
    Joseph A. DeVito
    Jonathan A. Mills
    Veronica G. Liu
    Anjana Agarwal
    Christine F. Sizemore
    Zhongjie Yao
    Daniel M. Stoughton
    Maria Grazia Cappiello
    Maria D.F.S. Barbosa
    Lorie A. Foster
    David L. Pompliano
    Nature Biotechnology, 2002, 20 : 478 - 483
  • [50] Target-specific acoustic predator deterrence in the marine environment
    Goetz, T.
    Janik, V. M.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 18 (01) : 102 - 111