Do Financial Incentives Increase Mental Health Treatment Engagement? A Meta-Analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Khazanov, Gabriela K. [1 ]
Morris, Paige E. [2 ]
Beed, Alexander [3 ]
Jager-Hyman, Shari [4 ]
Myhre, Karoline [4 ]
McKay, James R. [5 ]
Feinn, Richard S. [6 ]
Boland, Elaine M. [1 ]
Thase, Michael E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Crescenz Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Mental Illness Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Vet Integrated Serv Network 4, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[3] VA Cooperat Studies Program Coordinating Ctr, West Haven, CT USA
[4] Univ Penn, Penn Ctr Prevent Suicide, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Quinnipiac Univ, Frank H Netter MD Sch Med, Hamden, CT 06518 USA
关键词
financial incentives; contingency management; treatment engagement; treatment attendance; medication adherence; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE TREATMENT; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; COUNSELING ATTENDANCE; OUTPATIENT TREATMENT; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; USE DISORDERS; ABSTINENCE; DRUG;
D O I
10.1037/ccp0000737
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
What is the public health significance of this article? This study shows that it is effective to offer people seeking substance use treatment, and potentially also those seeking treatment for other mental health disorders, financial incentives to encourage them to attend treatment, take medication, and meet treatment goals. Objective: Engagement in mental health treatment is low, which can lead to poor outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy of offering patients financial incentives to increase their mental health treatment engagement, also referred to as contingency management. Method: We meta-analyzed studies offering financial incentives for mental health treatment engagement, including increasing treatment attendance, medication adherence, and treatment goal completion. Analyses were run within a multilevel framework. All study designs were included, and sensitivity analyses were run including only randomized and high-quality studies. Results: About 80% of interventions incentivized treatment for substance use disorders. Financial incentives significantly increased treatment attendance (Hedges' g = 0.49, [0.33, 0.64], k = 30, I-2 = 83.14), medication adherence (Hedges' g = 0.95, [0.47, 1.44], k = 6, I-2 = 87.73), and treatment goal completion (Hedges' g = 0.61, [0.22, 0.99], k = 5, I-2 = 60.55), including completing homework, signing treatment plans, and reducing problematic behavior. Conclusions: Financial incentives increase treatment engagement with medium to large effect sizes. We provide strong evidence for their effectiveness in increasing substance use treatment engagement and preliminary evidence for their effectiveness in increasing treatment engagement for other mental health disorders. Future research should prioritize testing the efficacy of incentivizing treatment engagement for mental health disorders aside from substance use. Research must also identify ways to incentivize treatment engagement that improve functioning and long-term outcomes and address ethical and systemic barriers to implementing these interventions.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:528 / 544
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Knowing What To Do and When To Do It: Mental Health Professionals and the Evidence Base for Treatment Engagement
    Kimberly D. Becker
    Kaylin Dickerson
    Maya M. Boustani
    Bruce F. Chorpita
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2021, 48 : 201 - 218
  • [42] Knowing What To Do and When To Do It: Mental Health Professionals and the Evidence Base for Treatment Engagement
    Becker, Kimberly D.
    Dickerson, Kaylin
    Boustani, Maya M.
    Chorpita, Bruce F.
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 48 (02) : 201 - 218
  • [43] Like This Meta-Analysis: Screen Media and Mental Health
    Ferguson, Christopher J.
    Kaye, Linda K.
    Branley-Bell, Dawn
    Markey, Patrick
    Ivory, James D.
    Klisanin, Dana
    Elson, Malte
    Smyth, Mark
    Hogg, Jerri Lynn
    McDonnell, Dean
    Nichols, Deborah
    Siddiqui, Shahbaz
    Gregerson, Mary
    Wilson, June
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2022, 53 (02) : 205 - 214
  • [44] Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies in mental health
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Riley, Richard D.
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2015, 18 (04) : 103 - 109
  • [45] Mental Health in Internationally Adopted Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis
    Askeland, Kristin Gartner
    Hysing, Mari
    La Greca, Annette M.
    Aaro, Leif Edvard
    Tell, Grethe S.
    Sivertsen, Borge
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 56 (03): : 203 - 213
  • [46] Symposium on Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Mental Health
    Das, B.
    Pachori, Hariom
    Sharma, Avinash
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 64
  • [47] Personal Growth Initiative and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis
    Weigold, Ingrid K.
    Weigold, Arne
    Russell, Elizabeth J.
    Wolfe, Ginelle L.
    Prowell, Jusiah L.
    Martin-Wagar, Caitlin A.
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 98 (04): : 376 - 390
  • [48] Effectiveness of Mental Health First Aid: a meta-analysis
    Maslowski, Amy K.
    LaCaille, Rick A.
    LaCaille, Lara J.
    Reich, Catherine M.
    Klingner, Jill
    MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW JOURNAL, 2019, 24 (04) : 245 - 261
  • [49] How Do Mental Health Providers Assess Treatment Engagement of Youth and Caregivers?
    Kimberly D. Becker
    Eleanor G. Wu
    Anna Hukill
    Nicole Brandt
    Bruce F. Chorpita
    Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2021, 30 : 2527 - 2538
  • [50] Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies
    Hackney, CH
    Sanders, GS
    JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2003, 42 (01) : 43 - 55