Livelihood strategies in a marine extractive reserve: Implications for conservation interventions

被引:14
|
作者
Santos, Anna N. [1 ]
Brannstrom, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geog, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Extractive reserve; Livelihoods; Artisanal fisheries; Institutions; Brazil; PROTECTED AREAS; COMANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; PROSPECTS; LESSONS; FORESTS; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The marine extractive reserve (RESEX), a sustainable use and co-management conservation instrument, is increasingly being established in coastal Brazil because of international and national pressure to protect coastal-marine environments. RESEX establishment is producing ambiguous outcomes despite claims of protecting rural livelihoods. This paper presents the case of the Cassuruba RESEX and demonstrates that a recent fishery agreement contradicts with fisherfolk livelihood diversification strategies and produces differentiated impacts on households. The findings are drawn from mixed methods adapting a household livelihoods approach to develop household typologies. Three household typologies emerged: (1) high market orientation, high income, (2) low market orientation, low income, and (3) high market orientation, low income. Low income households are the most impacted by new institutions that contradict with temporal and spatial livelihood diversification strategies of resource users. Also, they have lost fishing grounds, material assets (gear), and access to subsistence farmland. These findings support claims that sustainable use conservation agendas need to better consider the differential livelihood strategies of fisherfolk, and other resource users, or efforts for livelihood protection and improvement will be undermined. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 52
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Leveraging local livelihood strategies to support conservation and development in West Africa
    Sene-Harper, Aby
    Matarrita-Cascante, David
    Larson, Lincoln R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 29 : 16 - 28
  • [22] Improving alternative livelihood interventions in marine protected areas: A case study in Tanzania
    Katikiro, Robert E.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2016, 70 : 22 - 29
  • [23] The Spaces of Social Capital: Livelihood Geographies and Marine Conservation in the Cayos Cochinos Marine Protected Area, Honduras
    Lansing, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LATIN AMERICAN GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 8 (01) : 29 - 54
  • [24] ACHIEVING MARINE CONSERVATION THROUGH BIOSPHERE RESERVE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
    KENCHINGTON, RA
    AGARDY, MT
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1990, 17 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [25] Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management
    Gaines, Steven D.
    White, Crow
    Carr, Mark H.
    Palumbi, Stephen R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (43) : 18286 - 18293
  • [26] Managing for extinction? Conflicting conservation objectives in a large marine reserve
    Gerber, Leah R.
    Estes, James
    Crawford, Tara Gancos
    Peavey, Lindsey E.
    Read, Andrew J.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2011, 4 (06): : 417 - 422
  • [27] Social participation in the creation and management processes of the Marine Extractive Reserve of Tracuateua - PA, Brazil
    do Nascimento, Thaylana Pires
    do Nascimento, Josinaldo Reis
    [J]. NOVOS CADERNOS NAEA, 2020, 23 (01): : 129 - 154
  • [28] Mollusc assemblage in an urban bay nearby a marine extractive reserve, Florianopolis - SC, Brazil
    Gandara-Martins, Ana Luiza
    Marques de Almeida, Tito Cesar
    [J]. BIOTA NEOTROPICA, 2013, 13 (02): : 41 - 50
  • [29] Strategies of genetic biodiversity conservation in the marine environment
    Cognetti, G
    Maltagliati, F
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2004, 48 (9-10) : 811 - 812
  • [30] Livelihood strategies and local perceptions of a new nature conservation project in Nepal -: The Kanchenjunga Conservation Area Project
    Müller-Böker, U
    Kollmair, M
    [J]. MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 20 (04) : 324 - 331