Livelihood strategies in a marine extractive reserve: Implications for conservation interventions

被引:14
|
作者
Santos, Anna N. [1 ]
Brannstrom, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geog, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Extractive reserve; Livelihoods; Artisanal fisheries; Institutions; Brazil; PROTECTED AREAS; COMANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; PROSPECTS; LESSONS; FORESTS; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The marine extractive reserve (RESEX), a sustainable use and co-management conservation instrument, is increasingly being established in coastal Brazil because of international and national pressure to protect coastal-marine environments. RESEX establishment is producing ambiguous outcomes despite claims of protecting rural livelihoods. This paper presents the case of the Cassuruba RESEX and demonstrates that a recent fishery agreement contradicts with fisherfolk livelihood diversification strategies and produces differentiated impacts on households. The findings are drawn from mixed methods adapting a household livelihoods approach to develop household typologies. Three household typologies emerged: (1) high market orientation, high income, (2) low market orientation, low income, and (3) high market orientation, low income. Low income households are the most impacted by new institutions that contradict with temporal and spatial livelihood diversification strategies of resource users. Also, they have lost fishing grounds, material assets (gear), and access to subsistence farmland. These findings support claims that sustainable use conservation agendas need to better consider the differential livelihood strategies of fisherfolk, and other resource users, or efforts for livelihood protection and improvement will be undermined. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 52
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A reply to Santos and Brannstrom: Livelihood strategies in a marine extractive reserve: Implications for conservation interventions
    Santos Neto, Joaquim R.
    Giglio, Vinicius J.
    Schiavetti, Alexandre
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2016, 71 : 71 - 72
  • [2] Revealing the role of livelihood assets in livelihood strategies: Towards enhancing conservation and livelihood development in the Hara Biosphere Reserve, Iran
    Pour, Milad Dehghani
    Barati, Ali Akbar
    Azadi, Hossein
    Scheffran, Juergen
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 94 : 336 - 347
  • [3] Forests, Fields, and Pastures: Unequal Access to Brazil Nuts and Livelihood Strategies in an Extractive Reserve, Brazilian Amazon
    Ubiali, Bruno
    Alexiades, Miguel
    [J]. LAND, 2022, 11 (07)
  • [4] Livelihood implications of in situ-on farm conservation strategies of fruit species in Uzbekistan
    Elisabetta Gotor
    Mauricio R. Bellon
    Muhabbat Turdieva
    Karim Baymetov
    Parhod Nazarov
    Elena Dorohova-Shreder
    Vladislav Arzumanov
    Mikhail Dzavakyants
    Abduvahob Abdurasulov
    Galina Chernova
    Eugeniy Butkov
    Francesco Caracciolo
    [J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2018, 92 : 1253 - 1266
  • [5] Livelihood implications of in situ-on farm conservation strategies of fruit species in Uzbekistan
    Gotor, Elisabetta
    Bellon, Mauricio R.
    Turdieva, Muhabbat
    Baymetov, Karim
    Nazarov, Parhod
    Dorohova-Shreder, Elena
    Arzumanov, Vladislav
    Dzavakyants, Mikhail
    Abdurasulov, Abduvahob
    Chernova, Galina
    Butkov, Eugeniy
    Caracciolo, Francesco
    [J]. AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2018, 92 (05) : 1253 - 1266
  • [6] Balancing extractive and non-extractive uses in marine conservation plans
    Ruiz-Frau, Ana
    Kaiser, Michel J.
    Edwards-Jones, Gareth
    Klein, Carissa J.
    Segan, Daniel
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2015, 52 : 11 - 18
  • [8] Applying complementary species vulnerability assessments to improve conservation strategies in the Galapagos Marine Reserve
    Katherine A. Kaplan
    Ignasi Montero-Serra
    Ernesto L. Vaca-Pita
    Patrick J. Sullivan
    Esteban Suárez
    Luis Vinueza
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2014, 23 : 1509 - 1528
  • [9] Applying complementary species vulnerability assessments to improve conservation strategies in the Galapagos Marine Reserve
    Kaplan, Katherine A.
    Montero-Serra, Ignasi
    Vaca-Pita, Ernesto L.
    Sullivan, Patrick J.
    Suarez, Esteban
    Vinueza, Luis
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 23 (06) : 1509 - 1528
  • [10] The sources and prevalence of anthropogenic noise in Rockfish Conservation Areas with implications for marine reserve planning
    Nikolich, Katrina
    Halliday, William D.
    Pine, Matthew K.
    Cox, Kieran
    Black, Morgan
    Morris, Corey
    Juanes, Francis
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2021, 164