Self-spatial join selectivity estimation using fractal concepts

被引:22
|
作者
Belussi, A
Faloutsos, C
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Elettr & Informaz, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Comp Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Syst Res Inst, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
algorithms; theory; fractal dimension; range query; selectivity estimation; spatial join;
D O I
10.1145/279339.279342
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The problem of selectivity estimation for queries of nontraditional databases is still an open issue. In this article, we examine the problem of selectivity estimation for some types of spatial queries in databases containing real data. We have shown earlier [Faloutsos and Kamel 1994] that real point sets typically have a nonuniform distribution, violating consistently the uniformity and independence assumptions. Moreover, we demonstrated that the theory of fractals can help to describe real point sets. In this article we show how the concept of fractal dimension, i.e., (noninteger) dimension, can lead to the solution for the selectivity estimation problem in spatial databases. Among the infinite family of fractal dimensions, we consider here the Hausdorff fractal dimension D(0) and the "Correlation" fractal dimension D(2). Specifically, we show that (a) the average number of neighbors for a given point set follows a power law, with Da as exponent, and (b) the average number of nonempty range queries follows a power law with E - D(0) as exponent (E is the dimension of the embedding space). We present the formulas to estimate the selectivity for "biased" range queries, for self-spatial joins, and for the average number of nonempty range queries. The result of some experiments on real and synthetic point sets are shown. Our formulas achieve very low relative errors, typically about 10%, versus 40%-100% of the formulas that are based on the uniformity and independence assumptions.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 201
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adaptive sampling for selectivity estimation in spatial database
    Xu, D
    Ma, XJ
    Xie, KQ
    Han, L
    Zhang, HB
    Pu, W
    Zhang, HT
    IGARSS 2005: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-8, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 924 - 927
  • [22] Spatial join processing using corner transformation
    Song, JW
    Whang, KY
    Lee, YK
    Lee, MJ
    Kim, SW
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 1999, 11 (04) : 688 - 695
  • [23] Spatial join processing using corner transformation
    Department of Computer Science, Advanced Information Technology Research Center, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Korea, Republic of
    不详
    IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 4 (688-695):
  • [25] Spatial analysis of line-edge roughness through scaling and fractal concepts using AFM techniques
    Li, Ning
    Zhao, Xuezeng
    Wang, Weijie
    Li, Hongbo
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XX, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6152
  • [26] Theoretical concepts for fractal growth and self-organized criticality
    Pietronero, L
    FRACTALS-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON THE COMPLEX GEOMETRY OF NATURE, 1995, 3 (03): : 405 - 414
  • [27] The selectivity estimation of spatial query based on simple polygon
    Guo, P
    Chen, HZ
    Chen, ZL
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH JOINT INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER CONFERENCE, 2005, : 670 - 673
  • [28] Polyline Spatial Join Evaluation Using Raster Approximation
    Leonardo Guerreiro Azevedo
    Rodrigo Salvador Monteiro
    Geraldo zimbrão
    Jano Moreira de Souza
    GeoInformatica, 2003, 7 : 315 - 336
  • [29] Polyline spatial join evaluation using raster approximation
    Azevedo, LG
    Monteiro, RS
    Zimbrao, G
    de Souza, JM
    GEOINFORMATICA, 2003, 7 (04) : 315 - 336
  • [30] Using wavelet packets for selectivity estimation
    Ilić, S.S. (sinisa.ilic@pr.ac.rs), 1600, Oxford University Press (56):