Eligibility for early rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation in the UK Biobank

被引:20
|
作者
Kany, Shinwan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cardoso, Victor Roth [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Bravo, Laura [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Williams, John A. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Schnabel, Renate [1 ,3 ]
Fabritz, Larissa [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Gkoutos, Georgios V. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Kirchhof, Paulus [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Cardiol, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Broad Inst MIT & Harvard, Cardiovasc Dis Initiat, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[3] German Ctr Cardiovasc Sci DZHK, Partner Site Hamburg Kiel Lubeck, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Inst Translat Med, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[6] Hlth Data Res UK, Midlands Site, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, Inst Canc & Genom Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321196
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention (EAST-AFNET4) trial showed a clinical benefit of early rhythm-control therapy in patients with recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). The generalisability of the results in the general population is not known. Methods Participants in the population-based UK Biobank were assessed for eligibility based on the EAST-AFNET4 inclusion/exclusion criteria. Treatment of all eligible participants was classified as early rhythm-control (antiarrhythmic drug therapy or AF ablation) or usual care. To assess treatment effects, primary care data and Hospital Episode Statistics were merged with UK Biobank data. Efficacy and safety outcomes were compared between groups in the entire cohort and in a propensity-matched data set. Results AF was present in 35 526/502 493 (7.1%) participants, including 8340 (988 with AF <1 year) with AF at enrolment and 27 186 with incident AF during follow-up. Most participants (22 003/27 186; 80.9%) with incident AF were eligible for early rhythm-control. Eligible participants were older (70 years vs 63 years) and more likely to be female (42% vs 21%) compared with ineligible patients. Of 9004 participants with full primary care data, 874 (9.02%) received early rhythm-control. Safety outcomes were not different between patients receiving early rhythm-control and controls. The primary outcome of EAST-AFNET 4, a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke/transient ischaemic attack and hospitalisation for heart failure or acute coronary syndrome occurred less often in participants receiving early rhythm-control compared with controls in the entire cohort (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.94, p=0.005). In the propensity-score matched analysis, early rhythm-control did not significantly decrease of the primary outcome compared with usual care (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.04, p=0.124). Conclusion Around 80% of participants diagnosed with AF in the UK population are eligible for early rhythm-control. Early rhythm-control therapy was safe in routine care.
引用
收藏
页码:1873 / 1880
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Early Rhythm Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation From Symptom Control to Adverse Outcome Reduction
    Linz, Dominik
    Chaldoupi, Sevasti-Maria
    [J]. JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (07) : 1406 - 1408
  • [32] Rhythm control agents and adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Taylor, C. J.
    Hodgkinson, J.
    Hobbs, F. D. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 64 (08) : 1069 - 1075
  • [33] RECURRENCE OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS ASSIGNED TO A RHYTHM CONTROL STRATEGY
    Faber, Lothar
    da Silva, Douglas Brandao
    Lehmann, Roman Benetti
    Prinz, Christian
    Horstkotte, Dieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A441 - A441
  • [34] Should rhythm control be preferred in younger atrial fibrillation patients?
    Shaojie Chen
    Yuehui Yin
    Mitchell W. Krucoff
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2012, 35 : 71 - 80
  • [35] Should rhythm control be preferred in younger atrial fibrillation patients?
    Chen, Shaojie
    Yin, Yuehui
    Krucoff, Mitchell W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [36] Rhythm control agents and adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Marin, F.
    Lip, G. Y. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 64 (10) : 1329 - 1331
  • [37] Comparison of rate and rhythm control in hypertension patients with atrial fibrillation
    Yildiz, Ahmet
    Yigit, Zerrin
    Okcun, Baris
    Baskurt, Murat
    Ortak, Kadriye
    Kaya, Aysem
    Kucukoglu, Serdar
    [J]. CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2008, 72 (05) : 705 - 708
  • [38] Rate versus rhythm control in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation
    Pelargonio, G
    Prystowsky, EN
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (10): : 514 - 521
  • [39] Atrial fibrillation - Rhythm or rate control
    Cain, ME
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (23): : 1822 - 1823
  • [40] Rate versus rhythm control in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation
    Gemma Pelargonio
    Eric N Prystowsky
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, 2005, 2 : 514 - 521