Risk prediction models for colorectal cancer in people with symptoms: a systematic review

被引:44
|
作者
Williams, Tom G. S. [2 ]
Cubiella, Joaquin [3 ]
Griffin, Simon J. [1 ]
Walter, Fiona M. [1 ]
Usher-Smith, Juliet A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Primary Care Unit, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[3] Complexo Hosp Univ Ourense, Inst Invest Biomed Ourense Vigo Pontevedra, Dept Gastroenterol, Orense, Spain
来源
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2016年 / 16卷
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Risk; Model; Symptoms; Prediction; PATIENT CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRE; PRIMARY-CARE; GENERAL-PRACTICE; SCORING SYSTEM; IDENTIFYING PATIENTS; CLINICAL-FEATURES; MEDICAL HISTORY; VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-016-0475-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in Europe and the United States. Detecting the disease at an early stage improves outcomes. Risk prediction models which combine multiple risk factors and symptoms have the potential to improve timely diagnosis. The aim of this review is to systematically identify and compare the performance of models that predict the risk of primary CRC among symptomatic individuals. Methods: We searched Medline and EMBASE to identify primary research studies reporting, validating or assessing the impact of models. For inclusion, models needed to assess a combination of risk factors that included symptoms, present data on model performance, and be applicable to the general population. Screening of studies for inclusion and data extraction were completed independently by at least two researchers. Results: Twelve thousand eight hundred eight papers were identified from the literature search and three through citation searching. 18 papers describing 15 risk models were included. Nine were developed in primary care populations and six in secondary care. Four had good discrimination (AUROC > 0.8) in external validation studies, and sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.25 and 0.99 to 0.99 and 0.46 depending on the cut-off chosen. Conclusions: Models with good discrimination have been developed in both primary and secondary care populations. Most contain variables that are easily obtainable in a single consultation, but further research is needed to assess clinical utility before they are incorporated into practice.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk prediction models for colorectal cancer in people with symptoms: a systematic review
    Tom G. S. Williams
    Joaquín Cubiella
    Simon J. Griffin
    Fiona M. Walter
    Juliet A. Usher-Smith
    [J]. BMC Gastroenterology, 16
  • [2] Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    Walter, Fiona M.
    Emery, Jon D.
    Win, Aung K.
    Griffin, Simon J.
    [J]. CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (01) : 13 - 26
  • [3] Polygenic risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Sassano, Michele
    Mariani, Marco
    Quaranta, Gianluigi
    Pastorino, Roberta
    Boccia, Stefania
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [4] Polygenic risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Michele Sassano
    Marco Mariani
    Gianluigi Quaranta
    Roberta Pastorino
    Stefania Boccia
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 22
  • [5] Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer: A Review
    Win, Aung Ko
    MacInnis, Robert J.
    Hopper, John L.
    Jenkins, Mark A.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2012, 21 (03) : 398 - 410
  • [6] Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer Incorporating Common Genetic Variants: A Systematic Review
    McGeoch, Luke
    Saunders, Catherine L.
    Griffin, Simon J.
    Emery, Jon D.
    Walter, Fiona M.
    Thompson, Deborah J.
    Antoniou, Antonis C.
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2019, 28 (10) : 1580 - 1593
  • [7] Risk prediction models for breast cancer: a systematic review
    Zheng, Yadi
    Li, Jiang
    Wu, Zheng
    Li, He
    Cao, Maomao
    Li, Ni
    He, Jie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [8] Risk Prediction Models for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Gray, Eoin P.
    Teare, M. Dawn
    Stevens, John
    Archer, Rachel
    [J]. CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2016, 17 (02) : 95 - 106
  • [9] Risk Prediction Models for Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Harrison, Hannah
    Thompson, Rachel E.
    Lin, Zhiyuan
    Rossi, Sabrina H.
    Stewart, Grant D.
    Griffin, Simon J.
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (06): : 1380 - 1390
  • [10] Risk Prediction Models for Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Espressivo, Aufia
    Pan, Z. Sienna
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    Harrison, Hannah
    [J]. CANCERS, 2024, 16 (03)