Risk Prediction Models for Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review

被引:29
|
作者
Harrison, Hannah [1 ]
Thompson, Rachel E. [2 ]
Lin, Zhiyuan [2 ]
Rossi, Sabrina H. [3 ]
Stewart, Grant D. [3 ]
Griffin, Simon J. [1 ]
Usher-Smith, Juliet A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Primary Care Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Surg, Cambridge, England
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
Kidney cancer; Early detection; Screening; Systematic review; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; APPLICABILITY; BIOMARKERS; SURVIVAL; PROBAST; BIAS; TOOL; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Early detection of kidney cancer improves survival; however, low prevalence means that population-wide screening may be inefficient. Stratification of the population into risk categories could allow for the introduction of a screening programme tailored to individuals. Objective: This review will identify and compare published models that predict the risk of developing kidney cancer in the general population. Evidence acquisition: A search identified primary research reporting or validating models predicting the risk of kidney cancer in Medline and EMBASE. After screening identified studies for inclusion, we extracted data onto a standardised form. The risk models were classified using the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines and evaluated using the PROBAST assessment tool. Evidence synthesis: The search identified 15 281 articles. Sixty-two satisfied the inclusion criteria; performance measures were provided for 11 models. Some models predicted the risk of prevalent undiagnosed disease and others future incident disease. Six of the models had been validated, two using external populations. The most commonly included risk factors were age, smoking status, and body mass index. Most of the models had acceptable-to-good discrimination (area under the receiver-operating curve >0.7) in development and validation. Many models also had high specificity; however, several had low sensitivity. The highest performance was seen for the models using only biomarkers to detect kidney cancer; however, these were developed and validated in small case-control studies. Conclusions: We identified a small number of risk models that could be used to stratify the population according to the risk of kidney cancer. Most exhibit reasonable discrimination, but a few have been validated externally in population-based studies. Patient summary: In this review, we looked at mathematical models predicting the likelihood of an individual developing kidney cancer. We found several suitable models, using a range of risk factors (such as age and smoking) to predict the risk for individuals. Most of the models identified require further testing in the general population to confirm their usefulness. (c) 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1390
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk prediction models for symptomatic patients with bladder and kidney cancer: a systematic review
    Harrison, Hannah
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    Li, Lanxin
    Roberts, Lydia
    Lin, Zhiyuan
    Thompson, Rachel E.
    Rossi, Sabrina H.
    Stewart, Grant D.
    Walter, Fiona M.
    Griffin, Simon
    Zhou, Yin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 72 (714): : E11 - E18
  • [2] Risk prediction models for breast cancer: a systematic review
    Zheng, Yadi
    Li, Jiang
    Wu, Zheng
    Li, He
    Cao, Maomao
    Li, Ni
    He, Jie
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [3] Risk Prediction Models for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Gray, Eoin P.
    Teare, M. Dawn
    Stevens, John
    Archer, Rachel
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2016, 17 (02) : 95 - 106
  • [4] Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    Walter, Fiona M.
    Emery, Jon D.
    Win, Aung K.
    Griffin, Simon J.
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (01) : 13 - 26
  • [5] Risk Prediction Models for Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Espressivo, Aufia
    Pan, Z. Sienna
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    Harrison, Hannah
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [6] Risk prediction models for graft failure in kidney transplantation: a systematic review
    Kabore, Remi
    Haller, Maria C.
    Harambat, Jerome
    Heinze, Georg
    Leffondre, Karen
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 32 : 68 - 76
  • [7] Risk Prediction Models for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease A Systematic Review
    Tangri, Navdeep
    Kitsios, Georgios D.
    Inker, Lesley Ann
    Griffith, John
    Naimark, David M.
    Walker, Simon
    Rigatto, Claudio
    Uhlig, Katrin
    Kent, David M.
    Levey, Andrew S.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (08) : 596 - +
  • [8] Polygenic risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Sassano, Michele
    Mariani, Marco
    Quaranta, Gianluigi
    Pastorino, Roberta
    Boccia, Stefania
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [9] Polygenic risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Michele Sassano
    Marco Mariani
    Gianluigi Quaranta
    Roberta Pastorino
    Stefania Boccia
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [10] Validated risk prediction models for outcomes of acute kidney injury: a systematic review
    Fateme Nateghi Haredasht
    Laban Vanhoutte
    Celine Vens
    Hans Pottel
    Liesbeth Viaene
    Wouter De Corte
    BMC Nephrology, 24