Risk Prediction Models for Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review

被引:29
|
作者
Harrison, Hannah [1 ]
Thompson, Rachel E. [2 ]
Lin, Zhiyuan [2 ]
Rossi, Sabrina H. [3 ]
Stewart, Grant D. [3 ]
Griffin, Simon J. [1 ]
Usher-Smith, Juliet A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Primary Care Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Surg, Cambridge, England
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
Kidney cancer; Early detection; Screening; Systematic review; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; APPLICABILITY; BIOMARKERS; SURVIVAL; PROBAST; BIAS; TOOL; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Early detection of kidney cancer improves survival; however, low prevalence means that population-wide screening may be inefficient. Stratification of the population into risk categories could allow for the introduction of a screening programme tailored to individuals. Objective: This review will identify and compare published models that predict the risk of developing kidney cancer in the general population. Evidence acquisition: A search identified primary research reporting or validating models predicting the risk of kidney cancer in Medline and EMBASE. After screening identified studies for inclusion, we extracted data onto a standardised form. The risk models were classified using the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines and evaluated using the PROBAST assessment tool. Evidence synthesis: The search identified 15 281 articles. Sixty-two satisfied the inclusion criteria; performance measures were provided for 11 models. Some models predicted the risk of prevalent undiagnosed disease and others future incident disease. Six of the models had been validated, two using external populations. The most commonly included risk factors were age, smoking status, and body mass index. Most of the models had acceptable-to-good discrimination (area under the receiver-operating curve >0.7) in development and validation. Many models also had high specificity; however, several had low sensitivity. The highest performance was seen for the models using only biomarkers to detect kidney cancer; however, these were developed and validated in small case-control studies. Conclusions: We identified a small number of risk models that could be used to stratify the population according to the risk of kidney cancer. Most exhibit reasonable discrimination, but a few have been validated externally in population-based studies. Patient summary: In this review, we looked at mathematical models predicting the likelihood of an individual developing kidney cancer. We found several suitable models, using a range of risk factors (such as age and smoking) to predict the risk for individuals. Most of the models identified require further testing in the general population to confirm their usefulness. (c) 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1390
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic review of risk prediction models for falls after stroke
    Walsh, Mary E.
    Horgan, N. Frances
    Walsh, Cathal D.
    Galvin, Rose
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2016, 70 (05) : 513 - 519
  • [42] Understanding the contribution of lifestyle in breast cancer risk prediction: a systematic review of models applicable to Europe
    Elly Mertens
    Antonio Barrenechea-Pulache
    Diana Sagastume
    Maria Salve Vasquez
    Stefanie Vandevijvere
    José L. Peñalvo
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [43] Risk prediction models for antineoplastic-associated cardiotoxicity in treatment of breast cancer: A systematic review
    Rodriguez, Ryan
    Joseph, Honey
    Macrito, Rosa
    Lee, Todd A.
    Sweiss, Karen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2023, 80 (19) : 1315 - 1325
  • [44] From Algorithms to Clinical Utility: A Systematic Review of Individualized Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer
    Herrera, Deborah Jael
    van de Veerdonk, Wessel
    Seibert, Daiane Maria
    Boke, Moges Muluneh
    Gutierrez-Ortiz, Claudia
    Yimer, Nigus Bililign
    Feyen, Karen
    Ferrari, Allegra
    Van Hal, Guido
    GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS, 2023, 5 (04): : 549 - 579
  • [45] A systematic review of breast cancer incidence risk prediction models with meta-analysis of their performance
    Catherine Meads
    Ikhlaaq Ahmed
    Richard D. Riley
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012, 132 : 365 - 377
  • [46] Understanding the contribution of lifestyle in breast cancer risk prediction: a systematic review of models applicable to Europe
    Mertens, Elly
    Barrenechea-Pulache, Antonio
    Sagastume, Diana
    Vasquez, Maria Salve
    Vandevijvere, Stefanie
    Penalvo, Jose L.
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [47] A systematic review of breast cancer incidence risk prediction models with meta-analysis of their performance
    Meads, Catherine
    Ahmed, Ikhlaaq
    Riley, Richard D.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 132 (02) : 365 - 377
  • [48] Risk prediction models for postoperative outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery in the older population - a systematic review
    Souwer, Esteban T. D.
    Bastiaannet, Esther
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Dekker, Jan-Willem T.
    van den Bos, Frederiek
    Portielje, Johanna E. A.
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 11 (08) : 1217 - 1228
  • [49] A Review of Cancer Risk Prediction Models with Genetic Variants
    Wang, Xuexia
    Oldani, Michael J.
    Zhao, Xingwang
    Huang, Xiaohui
    Qian, Dajun
    CANCER INFORMATICS, 2014, 13 : 19 - 28
  • [50] Risk Prediction Models for Gastric Cancer: A Scoping Review
    Xu, Linyu
    Lyu, Jianxia
    Zheng, Xutong
    Wang, Aiping
    JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2024, 17 : 4337 - 4352