Production of biohydrogen by an anaerobic digestion process using the residual glycerol from biodiesel production as additive to cassava wastewater

被引:34
|
作者
Weiser Meier, Thompson Ricardo [1 ]
Cremonez, Paulo Andre [2 ]
Maniglia, Thiago Cintra [3 ]
Sampaio, Silvio Cesar [2 ]
Teleken, Joel Gustavo [1 ]
da Silva, Edson Antonio [4 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Parana UFPR, Dept Engn & Exact, Setor Palotina, Rua Pioneiro 2153, BR-85950000 Palotina, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ West Parana, Dept Agr Engn, Rua Univ 2069, BR-85819130 Cascavel, Parana, Brazil
[3] Fed Technol Univ Parana, Dept Biotechnol Engn, BR-85902490 Toledo, Parana, Brazil
[4] Univ West Parana, Dept Chem Engn, Rua Fac 645, BR-85903000 Toledo, PR, Brazil
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Bioenergy; Anaerobic digestion; Crude glycerol; Optimization; CO-DIGESTION; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; CRUDE GLYCEROL; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; SEED SLUDGE; STARCH INDUSTRY; MIXED CULTURE; PIG MANURE; FOOD WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120833
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite the significant increase in biogas and methane production provided by the addition of glycerol to agro-industrial waste when submitted to anaerobic biodigestion, just a few studies are directed to hydrogen production using this procedure. Thus, the present study evaluated the anaerobic biodigestion of the cassava wastewater with the addition of as much as 5% of residual glycerol mass. Wastewater inoculum from swine farming was used, which was characterized through the isolation of anaerobic microorganisms, DNA extraction and genetic sequencing, revealing that this inoculum contained bacteria from the genus Brevundimonas, from subgroup Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus, and from species Bacillus licheniformis. Factor planning 32 was established in order to evaluate the effects of temperature (between 37 and 43 degrees C) and glycerol concentration (between 1 and 5%) on hydrogen production to find the optimal values that would result in higher volumetric production of this gas. Control treatments without the addition of glycerol were also performed. The kinetics of biohydrogen production was experimentally determined and described by the Gompertz model. It was observed higher values of organic load removal for the treatments with the lowest concentrations of glycerol, despite this, the addition of glycerol provided the production of high volumes of hydrogen in concentrations ranging from 25.3 to 46.7%. The production of this biofuel in the treatments without the addition of glycerol ranged from 215.1 to 243.5 mL, while in the treatment with the addition of 3% of glycerol 1106.7 mL of hydrogen were obtained, an increase higher than 400%. On the other hand, hydrogen production per volume of treated waste was between 168.0 and 864.6 mLH2/L-residue. The optimal conditions obtained in this study for the biodigestion process were 4% glycerol and a temperature of 38.5 degrees C. In these conditions, the total volume of hydrogen predicted by the model was 1093.5 mL or 854.2 mLH2/L-residue, while the experimental value was 1102.6 mL or 861.4 mLH2/L-residue. The analysis of the organic acids produced and the removal of the organic load showed the need for additional treatment of the effluents produced, which can be carried out with the use of physically separated acid and methanogenic phase reactors, also providing the obtaining of methane. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Increasing biogas production from sewage sludge anaerobic co-digestion process by adding crude glycerol from biodiesel industry
    Nartker, Steven
    Ammerman, Michelle
    Aurandt, Jennifer
    Stogsdil, Michael
    Hayden, Olivia
    Antle, Chad
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (12) : 2567 - 2571
  • [32] Novel integration of biohydrogen production with fungal biodiesel production process
    Ghosh, Supratim
    Roy, Shantonu
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 288
  • [33] Biohydrogen Production from Crude Glycerol Using Anaerobic Mixed Cultures: Media Compositions Optimization
    Sittijunda, Sureewan
    Reungsang, Alissara
    CHIANG MAI JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2018, 45 (02): : 653 - 667
  • [34] Anaerobic Process for Biohydrogen Production using Keratin Degraded Effluent
    Dinesh, Gujuluva Hari
    Murugan, Ramu Satheesh
    Mohanrasu, Kulanthaisamy
    Arumugam, Nagarajan
    Basu, Muthuramalingam Jothi
    Arun, Alagarsamy
    JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 13 (02): : 1135 - 1143
  • [35] Anaerobic Digestion Process for the Production of Biogas from Cassava and Sewage Treatment Plant Sludge in Brazil
    Sergio Peres
    Marina Rebeca Monteiro
    Micheline Lima Ferreira
    Adalberto Freire do Nascimento Junior
    Maria de Los Angeles Perez Fernandez Palha
    BioEnergy Research, 2019, 12 : 150 - 157
  • [36] Anaerobic Digestion Process for the Production of Biogas from Cassava and Sewage Treatment Plant Sludge in Brazil
    Peres, Sergio
    Monteiro, Marina Rebeca
    Ferreira, Micheline Lima
    do Nascimento Junior, Adalberto Freire
    Perez Fernandez Palha, Maria de Los Angeles
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (01) : 150 - 157
  • [37] Biohydrogen production from cassava starch processing wastewater by thermophilic mixed cultures
    O-Thong, Sompong
    Hniman, Adilan
    Prasertsan, Poonsuk
    Imai, Tsuyoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (05) : 3409 - 3416
  • [38] Kinetic modeling of biohydrogen production from complex wastewater by anaerobic cultures
    Abhijit, Gadhe
    Shriram, Sonawane
    Mahesh, Varma
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 17 (12): : 129 - 135
  • [39] Biohydrogen production from diary processing wastewater by anaerobic biofilm reactors
    Maria Moreno-Davila, Ileana Mayela
    Javier Rios-Gonzalez, Leopoldo
    Garza-Garcia, Yolanda
    Antonio Rodriguez-de la Garza, Jose
    Rodriguez-Martinez, Jesus
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 10 (27): : 5320 - 5326
  • [40] Anaerobic digestion of glycerol derived from biodiesel manufacturing
    Siles Lopez, Jose Angel
    Martin Santos, Maria de los Angeles
    Chica Perez, Arturo Francisco
    Martin Martin, Antonio
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (23) : 5609 - 5615