Quantifying Co-Benefits and Trade-Offs between Forest Ecosystem Services in the Gan River Basin of South China

被引:3
|
作者
Dai, Erfu [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoli [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Jianjia [3 ]
Tian, Qing [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Marine Data & Informat Serv Ctr, Tianjin 300171, Peoples R China
[3] Hebei Normal Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Hort Sci & Technol, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] George Mason Univ, Dept Computat Social Sci, 4400 Univ Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecosystem service; InVEST model; trade-off; forest plantation; Southern China; TIMBER PRODUCTION; CARBON STORAGE; BIODIVERSITY; WATER; CONSERVATION; HETEROGENEITY; PLANTATIONS; MANAGEMENT; SYNERGIES; PROVISION;
D O I
10.3390/su14148271
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forest ecosystem services are intrinsically linked. We design a spatially explicit approach to quantify and analyze the co-benefits and trade-offs between the main forest ecosystem services. Our goal is to develop criteria for forest management that include ecosystem service interactions. Chinese fir and pine plantations provide the largest portion of the overall ecosystem services currently provided. They are volume stock and water yield service hotspots, but these have negative effects on soil retention and carbon storage, causing environmental problems. The natural forests (broad-leaf and bamboo forests) are carbon storage and volume stock hotspots and show the lowest erosion modulus. Thus, their protection, combined with expanding the plantation area under forest management should be considered in order to increase ecosystem service synergies. In contrast, an increased area of broad-leaf plantations reduces water yield service due to their lower water production capacity, in comparison with plantations of fast-growing species. Our study shows that the inclusion of ecosystem services as part of forest management could provide opportunities for optimal allocation of forest resources and sustainable utilization. Management based only on economically beneficial ecosystem services can be detrimental to the forest ecosystem and can cause environmental problems.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin, China
    Geng, Wenliang
    Li, Yanyan
    Zhang, Pengyan
    Yang, Dan
    Jing, Wenlong
    Rong, Tianqi
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 138
  • [32] The climate benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs of green infrastructure: A systematic literature review
    Choi, Changsoon
    Berry, Pam
    Smith, Alison
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 291
  • [33] The power of hydropeaking: Trade-offs between flexible hydropower and river ecosystem services in Europe
    Venus, Terese E.
    Ola, Oreoluwa
    Alp, Maria
    Baetz, Nico
    Bejarano, Maria Dolores
    Boavida, Isabel
    Bruno, Maria Cristina
    Casas-Mulet, Roser
    Carolli, Mauro
    Chiogna, Gabriele
    Gosselin, Marie-Pierre
    Halleraker, Jo H.
    Noack, Markus
    Tonolla, Diego
    Vanzo, Davide
    Hayes, Daniel S.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2025, 233
  • [34] Ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in China, 2000–2015
    W. Chen
    G. Chi
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 3221 - 3236
  • [35] The impact of secondary forest restoration on multiple ecosystem services and their trade-offs
    Zeng, Yelin
    Gou, Mengmeng
    Ouyang, Shuai
    Chen, Liang
    Fang, Xi
    Zhao, Lijuan
    Li, Jiaxiang
    Peng, Changhui
    Xiang, Wenhua
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 104 : 248 - 258
  • [36] Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: current debates on the breadth of REDD+
    Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J.
    McDermott, Constance
    Vijge, Marjanneke J.
    Cashore, Benjamin
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) : 646 - 653
  • [37] Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Delta, China: response to urbanizing variation
    Sha Chen
    Guan Li
    Yuefei Zhuo
    Zhongguo Xu
    Yanmei Ye
    Jessica P. R. Thorn
    Robert Marchant
    Urban Ecosystems, 2022, 25 : 313 - 328
  • [38] Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Delta, China: response to urbanizing variation
    Chen, Sha
    Li, Guan
    Zhuo, Yuefei
    Xu, Zhongguo
    Ye, Yanmei
    Thorn, Jessica P. R.
    Marchant, Robert
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2022, 25 (01) : 313 - 328
  • [39] PM in global climate and air quality policies: Co-benefits and trade-offs
    Van Dingenen, R.
    Van Aardenne, J.
    Dentener, F.
    Marmer, E.
    Vignati, E.
    Russ, P.
    Szabo, L.
    Raes, F.
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2009, 73 (13) : A1369 - A1369
  • [40] A rapid assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs among Sustainable Development Goals
    Singh, Gerald G.
    Cisneros-Montemayor, Andres M.
    Swartz, Wilf
    Cheung, William
    Guy, J. Adam
    Kenny, Tiff-Annie
    McOwen, Chris J.
    Asch, Rebecca
    Geffert, Jan Laurens
    Wabnitz, Colette C. C.
    Sumaila, Rashid
    Hanich, Quentin
    Ota, Yoshitaka
    MARINE POLICY, 2018, 93 : 223 - 231