Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of In-Hospital Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

被引:24
|
作者
Alqahtani, Fahad [1 ]
Ziada, Khaled M. [2 ]
Badhwar, Vinay [1 ]
Sandhu, Gurpreet [3 ]
Rihal, Charanjit S. [3 ]
Alkhouli, Mohamad [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Heart & Vasc Inst, 1 Med Dr, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Div Cardiovasc Med, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
coronary artery bypass grafting; graft failure; percutaneous coronary intervention; OFF-PUMP; ON-PUMP; UNITED-STATES; FAILURE; SURGERY; PATENCY; REVASCULARIZATION; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.071
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Post-operative acute coronary ischemia is an uncommon complication of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, data on the incidence and outcomes of early coronary ischemia and in-hospital percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) after CABG are scarce. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of early (in-hospital) PCI following CABG. METHODS This study utilized the National Inpatient Sample to select patients who underwent CABG between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2014. Patients who had acute coronary ischemia requiring in-hospital PCI after CABG were compared with patients who did not need PCI. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were major complications, length-of-stay, and cost. Predictors of the need for post-CABG PCI were assessed in multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS Among the 554,987 studied patients, 24,503 (4.4%) had suspected acute coronary ischemia and underwent angiography post-operatively, of whom 14,323 had PCI. The majority (71.4%) of PCIs were performed within 24 h following CABG. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in patients who underwent PCI (5.1% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001). The excess mortality persisted after multiple risk adjustments and sensitivity analyses. Patients who underwent postCABG PCI had higher rates of strokes (2.1% vs. 1.6%; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (16% vs. 12.3%; p < 0.001), and infectious complications. Post-CABG PCI was also associated with longer hospitalizations and a w50% increase in cost. Nonelective admissions and off-pump CABG were the strongest predictors of needing an in-hospital PCI following CABG. CONCLUSIONS In-hospital post-CABG PCI is uncommon but is associated with significantly increasedmorbidity, mortality, and cost. Further studies are needed to assess modifiable risk factors for early coronary compromise following CABG. (c) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 423
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting Reply
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Mohr, Friedrich W.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (25): : 2674 - 2675
  • [42] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting to Treat Ischemic Cardiomyopathy?
    Velazquez, Eric J.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 5 (06) : 641 - 642
  • [43] Multivessel disease: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting
    Munir, Muhammad S.
    Delaughter, Craig
    Ahmed, Amany H.
    Lee, Vei-Vei
    Elayda, MacArthur A.
    Wilson, James M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (09) : 40B - 40B
  • [44] Previous Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Ferreira Lisboa, Luiz Augusto
    Vilca Mejia, Omar Asdrubal
    Oliveira Dallan, Luis Alberto
    Pinho Moreira, Luiz Felipe
    Puig, Luiz Boro
    Jatene, Fabio Biscegli
    Groppo Stolf, Noedir Antonio
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2012, 99 (01) : 586 - 595
  • [45] Coronary artery bypass grafting in acute myocardial infarction: analysis of predictors of in-hospital mortality
    Vilca Mejia, Omar Asdrubal
    Lisboa, Luiz A. Ferreira
    Tiveron, Marcos Gradim
    Duncan Santiago, Jose Augusto
    Tineli, Rafael Angelo
    Oliveira Dallan, Luis Alberto
    Jatene, Fabio Biscegli
    Groppo Stolf, Noedir Antonio
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIRURGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2012, 27 (01): : 66 - 74
  • [46] Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Multivessel Disease
    Takagi, Hisato
    Umemoto, Takuya
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (06) : 1006 - 1007
  • [47] Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ESRD
    Chang, Tara I.
    Shilane, David
    Kazi, Dhruv S.
    Montez-Rath, Maria E.
    Hlatky, Mark A.
    Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 23 (12): : 2042 - 2049
  • [48] Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Diabetes
    Bianco, Valentino
    Kilic, Arman
    Mulukutla, Suresh R.
    Gleason, Thomas G.
    Kliner, Dustin
    Aranda-Michel, Edgar
    Brown, James A.
    Wang, Yisi
    Allen, Christopher C.
    Habertheuer, Andreas
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 33 (02) : 368 - 377
  • [49] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting A Surgical Perspective
    Gaudino, Mario
    Taggart, David P.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 4 (06) : 505 - 506
  • [50] Incidence of depression and correlations with cognitive outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting
    Seines, O
    McKhann, GM
    Borowicz, LM
    Goldsborough, MA
    Enger, C
    NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (03) : 50003 - 50003