Writing Assignments to Assess Statistical Thinking

被引:14
|
作者
Woodard, Victoria [1 ]
Lee, Hollylynne [2 ]
Woodard, Roger [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, 152D Hurley Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA
来源
JOURNAL OF STATISTICS EDUCATION | 2020年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
Argumentation; Statistical thinking; Second statistics course; Written assessment;
D O I
10.1080/10691898.2019.1696257
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
One of the main goals of statistics is to use data to provide evidence in support of an argument. This article will discuss some popular forms of writing assessments currently in use, to demonstrate the differences between the methods for structuring the students' learning to support their arguments with evidence. We share a model, which was originally created to assess students in introductory statistics and has been adapted for the second course in statistics, which takes a unique approach toward assessing the students' understanding of statistical concepts through writing. In this model, students are expected to answer prompts that required them to (1) take a stance on an argument, (2) defend their position with facts given in the prompt, (3) discern the implications that those facts implied, and (4) give a proper conclusion to their argument. We provide examples of a few of the writing assignment prompts used in the course, their intended assessment purpose, and common answers that students gave to these assignments. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 44
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条